journal article·2021-04-01

Development of converging-diverging multi-jet nozzles for molten smelt shattering in kraft recovery boilers

ERIC JIN, TONY HABIB, SIMON YOUSSEF, STEVE OSBORNE, HONGHI TRAN

TAPPI Journal· Volume 20· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The effective shattering of molten smelt is highly desired in recovery boiler systems. Ideally, shatter jet nozzle designs should: i) generate high shattering energy; ii) create a wide coverage; and iii) minimize steam consumption. This study proposes a novel converging-diverging multi-jet nozzle design to achieve these goals. A laboratory setup was established, and the nozzle performance was evaluated by generating jet pressure profiles from the measurement of a pitot tube array. The results show that the shatter jet strength is greater with a large throat diameter, high inlet pressure, and a short distance between the nozzle exit and impingement position. Increasing the number of orifices generates a wider jet coverage, and the distance between the orifices should be limited to avoid the formation of a low-pressure region between the orifices. The study also demonstrates that an optimized converging-diverging multi-jet nozzle significantly outperformed a conventional shatter jet nozzle by achieving higher energy and wider coverage while consuming less steam.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Combustion and flame dynamics · Heat Transfer Mechanisms · Radiative Heat Transfer Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (11)

Show source-provided references
1. Taranenko, A., “Shattering kraft recovery boiler smelt by a steam jet,” M.A.Sc. thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2013.
2. Lin, Z., “Characterizing smelt shattering in a recovery boiler,” M.A.Sc. thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, 2014.
3. Grace, T. and Tran, H.N., “Critical issues in smelt dissolving tank operations,” Int. Chem. Recovery Conf.; TAPPI/PAPTAC; Peachtree Corners, GA, USA/Brossard, QC, Canada; 2010.
4. Jin, E., Bussmann, M., and Tran, H.N., TAPPI J. 14(6): 385(2015). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ14.6.385.10.32964/TJ14.6.385 ↗
5. Jin, E., Bussmann, M., Jones, A.K., et al., J. Sci. Technol. For. Prod. Processes 7(2): 38(2018).
6. Jin, E., “Fundamental study of smelt droplet-water interaction in the kraft recovery boiler dissolving tank,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, 2017.
7. Jin, E., Mackenzie, M., Osborne, S., et al., TAPPI J. 19(8): 401(2020).10.32964/TJ19.8.401 ↗
8. Hicks, E.P. and Menzies, D.C., “Theoretical studies on the fast reactor maximum accident,” Proceedings of the Conference on Safety, Fuels and Core Design in Large Fast Power Reactors, Report ANL-7120, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, USA, 1965, p. 654.
9. Bussmann, M., Jin, E., Lin, M., et al., J. Sci. Technol. For. Prod. Processes 4(6): 6(2014).
10. Tran, H.N., Jones, A.K., and Grace, T., TAPPI J. 14(1): 41(2015). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ14.1.41.10.32964/TJ14.1.41 ↗
11. Tran, H.N. and Jones, A.K., TAPPI J. 16(10): 597(2017). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ16.10.597.10.32964/TJ16.10.597 ↗