Margins-based planning applied to newsprint manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
The North American newsprint industry is facing a difficult financial situation due to a major market decline. The application of supply chain management concepts could greatly help this struggling industry by enhancing the cost-effectiveness of operations. In this paper, an integrated tactical planning model based on optimization was used to exploit manufacturing flexibility in order to adapt production to changing market conditions. This model was applied to a real case study of a newsprint mill with overcapacity in its thermomechanical and deinking pulping lines. Results show that by using a margins-based planning model to identify better-adapted operating policies in case of varying wood chips and recycled paper prices, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) can be increased by up to 35%. The benefits of exploiting manufacturing flexibility were found to be more important in difficult market scenarios, highlighting its pertinence for providing more-robust planning approaches. Pulp and paper companies would benefit from using a margins-based planning model to manage the complexity of their operations in the face of market volatility.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Supply Chain and Inventory Management · Optimization and Packing Problems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Shapiro, J.F., Modeling the Supply Chain, Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, 2007, p. 608.
2. McLean, S., Pulp Pap. Int. 41(10): 28(1999).10.3102/0013189X028008041 ↗
3. Lail, P.W., Supply Chain Best Practices for the Pulp and Paper Industry, TAPPI Press, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2003.
4. D’Amours, S., Ronnqvist, M., and Weintraub, A., INFOR 46(4): 265(2008).10.3138/infor.46.4.265 ↗
5. Carlsson, D. and Rönnqvist, M., Eur. J. Oper. Res. 163(3): 589(2005).10.1016/j.ejor.2004.02.001 ↗
6. Feng, Y., D’Amours, S., and Beauregard, R., Int. J. Prod. Econ. 115(1): 189(2008).10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.06.002 ↗
7. Kannegiesser, M. and Gunther, H.O., J. Oper. Res. Soc. 62(4): 711(2011).10.1057/jors.2010.18 ↗
8. Lail, P.W., Pulp Pap. 80(11): 23(2006).10.1016/j.cities.2005.08.006 ↗
9. Turney, P., Common Cents: How to Succeed with Activity-Based Costing and Activity-Based Management, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2005, p. 336.
10. Korpunen, H., Virtanen, P., Dahl, O., et al., TAPPI J. 11(9): 19(2012).10.32964/TJ11.9.19 ↗
11. Laflamme-Mayer, M., Janssen, M., and Stuart, P.R., J. Sci. Technol. For. Prod. Processes 1(1): 32(2011).
12. Korbel, M., “On-line steady-state data reconciliation for advanced cost analysis in the pulp and paper industry,” Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Polytechnique, Montréal, QC, Canada, 2011.
13. Korbel, M. and Stuart, P.R. in Integrated Biorefineries: Design, Analysis,and Optimization (M.M. El-Halwagi and P. Stuart, Eds.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012, pp. 129-155.
14. Dansereau, L.P., El-Halwagi, M.M., and Stuart, P.R. in Integrated Biorefineries: Design, Analysis, and Optimization (M.M. El-Halwagi and P. Stuart, Eds.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2012, pp. 195-250.10.1016/B978-1-85617-744-3.00021-7 ↗
15. Dansereau, L.P., El-Halwagi, M.M., Mansoornejad, B., et al., Comput. Chem. Eng., in press.
16. Dansereau, L.P., El-Halwagi, M.M., and Stuart, P.R., J. Sci. Technol. For. Prod. Processes 2(4): 60(2012).