journal article·2016-08-01

Evaluation of near-drum thinning data in recovery boiler generating bank tubes

W.B.A. SANDY SHARP, W.A. BILLY JONES

TAPPI Journal· Volume 15· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Near-drum thinning affects the fireside surface of recovery boiler generating bank tubes near the surface of the mud drum. Although sophisticated thickness scanning equipment has been developed to rapidly make tens of thousands of thickness measurements in the portion of a tube that is vulnerable to near-drum thinning, methods for using these data to evaluate fitness-for-service have not shown similar advances. Non-destructive testing companies typically use a technician’s subjective judgment to identify the “thinnest reliable" thickness measurement on each tube. Some mills decide whether tubes can continue in operation or should be plugged or replaced based on this single thickness measurement. However, finite element analysis of the remaining strength of individual tubes thinned in the near-drum area suggests that it is essentially impossible to identify the weakest tubes from simple empirical rules. In the absence of an industry standard for evaluating these data, different mills could reach different conclusions about the fitness-for-service of a tube from the same data set. This paper reviews the technology for scanning the thickness of generating bank tubes and discusses approaches that have been used to identify the tubes most weakened by near-drum thinning and to evaluate the fitness-for-service of individual tubes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Mineral Processing and Grinding

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Atter-Jacobs, L., “American Paper Institute, Inc., Special Notice – Tube Thinning,” 11 May 1981.
2. Thompson, R., Singbeil, D., Guzi, C., et al., Proc. - Int. Symp. Corros. Pulp Pap. Ind., 7th, TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1992, p. 309.
3. Cawein, R.W. and Nin, C., Tappi J. 66(5): 61(1983).
4. Singbeil, D., Proc. Annu. Meet. Tech. Sect., CPPA, 78th, Canadian Pulp and Paper Association, Montreal, QC, Canada, 1992, p. A335.
5. Poon, W., Barham, D., and Tran, H.N., Tappi J. 76(7): 187(1993).
6. Falat, L., Westvaco Corporation, private communication, 5 March 1993.
7. Guzi, C., Proc. - Int. Symp. Corros. Pulp Pap. Ind., 7th, TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 1992, p. 199.
8. Stasuk, D.G., TAPPI Eng. Conf., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 1991, p. 175.
9. Guzi, C., Proc. - Int. Symp. Corros. Pulp Pap. Ind., 8th, Swedish Corrosion Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 1995, p. 127.
10. TAPPI TIP 0416-08 “Guidelines for replacement of generating bank tubes with expanded joints in two-drum boilers,” TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 2002.
11. Stasuk, D., TAPPI Eng. Papermakers Conf., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 1997, p. 1079.
12. American Petroleum Institute, API Recommended Practice 579 “Fitness-for-service,” American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
13. American Petroleum Institute, API Recommended Practice 579-1/ ASME FFS-1 “Fitness-for-service,” 2nd edn., American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, 2007.
14. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, “Criteria of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for Design by Analysis in Sections III and Section VIII, Division 2,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1969.