journal article·2007-10-01

Factors contributing to improved environmental performance in the Finnish kraft pulping industry

HELENA WESSMAN

TAPPI Journal· Volume 6· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

This study describes the environmental significance of kraft pulping technology developments in Finnish kraft pulp mills. Data on kraft production technology and process energy were collected directly from seven mills. Results are presented as an average of these data. The study presents the main interactions between technology development and environmental performance, particularly water emissions, air emissions, and energy. Supporting technology (e.g., waste treatment operations) and core technology (e.g., liquor processing) were found to be equally important in reducing the environmental loads from kraft pulp mills. The most important supporting technologies are well-operated activated sludge treatment plants and various purification techniques for air emissions. The most important core technologies include dry debarking, oxygen delignification, improved black liquor concentration, and lime mud drying. Wastewater volume has less effect on releases of chemical oxygen demand (COD) than expected. Energy balances are highly dependent on the age of the mill and on whether the pulping and papermaking operations are integrated. Energy balances are usually unaffected by single technology developments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Landfill Environmental Impact Studies · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. “The Finnish background report for the EC documentation of best available technique for pulp and paper industry,” Environmental Protection 96, Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland, 1997.
2. Malinen, R., Wartiovaara, I., and Välttilä, O., “Scenario analysis of the development of Finnish pulp industry up to the Year 2010,” SYTYKE 22, Pub. Series A 123, Water and Environment Administration, Helsinki, Finland, 1993.10.2166/wst.1994.0699 ↗
3. N. DeMartini, M. Forssén, K. Niemelä, et al., TAPPI J., 3(10):3(2004).
4. “Reduction of atmospheric emis-sions from pulp industry,” Rept. No. 4008, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden, 1992.
5. Tarpey, T., Tran H., and Mao X. J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 22(4): J145(1996).
6. Kymäläinen, M., Forssen M., DeMartini, N., et. al., J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 27(3): 75(2001).
7. Smook, G., Handbook for Pulp and Paper Technologists, 3rd edn., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, Georgia, 2002.
8. Environmental Statistics 1991–2003, Finnish Forest Industries Federation, Helsinki, Finland.
9. Energy Visions 2030 for Finland, VTT Energy, EDITA, Helsinki, Finland, 2003.
10. Saviharju, K., “Nitrogen balances in recovery boilers,” Presented at the Seminar for Chemistry Technology, Espoo, Finland, 1995.
11. Salmenoja, K., Haaga, K., Janka, et. al., Appita Annual General Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1, APPITA, Carlton, Victoria, Australia, 1999.
12. Stigsson, L., and Berglin, N., 6th SPCI Conference Proceedings, Stockholm, Sweden, 1999.
13. McKeough, P. J., Arpiainen, V. Mäkinen, et. al., International Chemical Recovery Conference Proceedings, TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, Georgia, 1995.
14. “Integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC),” Ref. doc. on Best Available Techniques in the Pulp and Paper Industry, European Commission, December 2001.
15. KCL, internal report, Espoo, Finland.