Research on improving the basis weight measurement accuracy of tissue paper based on PSO-BP neural network
Source abstract
Abstract
The near-infrared (NIR) sensor can be used for measuring the basis weight and moisture of tissue paper, but the measurement accuracy is not ideal for this paper grade. The weight range of the tissue is 10~30 g/m2, indicating that it is a low gram weight paper. The temperature and humidity of the production environment significantly impact an NIR sensor. This paper focuses on improving the measurement accuracy of tissue paper basis weight. In order to reduce the influences of temperature and humidity, a mathematical model based on a particle swarm optimization back propagation (PSO-BP) neural network is proposed. In comparison with multiple linear regression measurement models, the basis weight measurement error with the PSO-BP model is within ± 0.5 g/m2. This model can effectively improve the measurement accuracy and has a good effect on overcoming the basis weight nonlinear effect caused by the changes in ambient temperature and humidity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies · Food Supply Chain Traceability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen, Y., Du, S., and Yuan, Z., Chin. J. 32(10): 112(2013).10.5732/cjc.013.10018 ↗
2. Adamopoulos, S., Passialis, C., Voulgaridis, E., et al., Drewno 57(191):145(2014).10.12841/wood.1644-3985.053.11 ↗
3. Chu, X., Shi, Y., Chen, B., et, al., J. Instrum. Anal. 38(6): 603(2019).
4. Dong, P., “Study of paper moisture and weight testing techniques based on near-infrared radio,” Master’s thesis, Chang’ an University, Xi’an, China, 2009.
5. Kangasraasio, J., Measurement 44(10): 1937(2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2011.08.024.10.1016/j.measurement.2011.08.024 ↗
6. Ye, W. and Sun, Y., Laser Infrared 30(4): 230(2000).10.1080/714041878 ↗
7. Yu, D.H., Li, L., Cao, L.H., et al., Adv. Mater. Res. 562: 1348(2012). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.562-564.1348.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.562-564.1348 ↗
8. Tsuchikawa, S., Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 42(1): 43(2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/05704920601036707.10.1080/05704920601036707 ↗
9. Hu, L. and Ma, J., TAPPI J. 21(5): 247(2022). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ21.5.247.10.32964/TJ21.5.247 ↗
10. De Ruvo, A., Lundberg, R., Martin-Löf, S., et al., Fundam. Prop. Pap. Relat. Its Uses, Trans. Symp., British Paper Board Industry Federation, London, 1976, p. 785.
11. Liu Jianghao, G.S., Wang, Y., Li, X., et al., J. Beijing Inst. Graphic Commun. 21(4): 5(2013).
12. Azmi, M., Araghinejad, S., and Kholghi, M., Iran. J. Sci. Technol., Trans. B: Eng. 34(B1): 81(2010).
13. Bashari, M., Rahimi-Kian, A., Farhangi, S., et al., Smart Grid Conf., Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/SGC.2014.7090856.10.1109/sgc.2014.7090856 ↗
14. Huang, L., Liu, X., Wei, H., et al., “Urban rainfall forecasting method based on multi-model prediction information fusion,” 6th IEEE Int. Conf. Inf. Manage. (ICIM), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020, p. 210.10.1109/icim49319.2020.244700 ↗
15. Moran Loza, J.M., Perez Cisneros, M.A., and Garcia Arreola, A., “Artificial neural networks vs regression techniques in the forecasting of contaminants in the Santiago River, based on the sample of a pollutant, through data fusion,” Int. Conf. Smart Technol. Smart Nation (SmartTechCon), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017, p. 183. https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartTechCon.2017.8358366.10.1109/smarttechcon.2017.8358366 ↗
16. Shao, H. and Deng, X., Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 83: 79(2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.03.059.10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.03.059 ↗