journal article·2021-12-01

Influence of pallet pattern on top-to-bottom compression performance of unitized loads

KYLE DUNNO, CHANGFENG GE, GLENN ROGERS, STEVE JOHNSON

TAPPI Journal· Volume 20· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Environmental scaling factors estimate a corrugated container’s ability to withstand various conditions it will encounter during the storage and distribution process. In this project, we examined the compressive resistance of unitized loads using differing pallet stacking patterns. To simulate real-world failure scenarios in our laboratory tests, we used two different nominal board grades of single-wall C-flute regular slotted containers loaded with a plywood panel and bagged salt to direct the failure location to the bottom of the stack. Our results showed that the columnar aligned pattern provided the greatest compressive resistance and the interlocked stacking arrangement yielded the lowest of the patterns evaluated. Based on the study results, we calculated box compression retention multipliers for each pattern and compared them to scaling factors published by the Fibre Box Association.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Park, J., Horvath, L., White, M., et al., Packag. Technol. Sci. 31(11): 701(2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2385.10.1002/pts.2385 ↗
2. White, M. and Hamner, P., For. Prod. J. 55(3): 8(2005).
3. FBA, Fibre Box Handbook, 75th anniversary edn., Fibre Box Association, Itasca, IL, USA, 2015.
4. Ievans, U.I., Tappi 58(8): 108(1975).
5. Kellicutt, K.Q., Tappi 45(1): 151A(1963).
6. Singh, J., Singh, S.P., and Saha, K., J. Appl. Packag. Res. 5(3): 131(2011).
7. DiSalvo, M., “Interactive effects of pal-letizing factors on fiberboard packaging strength,” M.S. thesis, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, USA, 1999.
8. Koning, J.W. and Moody, R.C., Boxboard Containers 74(4): 56(1966).
9. Rha, S.-Y., “Loss in compression strength of corrugated containers due to offset and its effect on stability of palletized loads,” M.S. thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA, 1996.
10. Frank, B., Gilgenbach, M., and Maltenfort, M., Packag. Technol. Sci. 23(5): 275(2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.898.10.1002/pts.898 ↗
11. Frank, B., Packag. Technol. Sci. 27(2):105(2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2019.10.1002/pts.2019 ↗
12. Singh, S.P., Singh, J., and Saha, K., J. Appl. Packag. Res. 5(3): 157(2011).
13. Urbanik, T.J. and Frank, B., Wood Fiber Sci. 38(3): 399(2006).