Press wetting as an enhanced wetting method for baled OCC material
Source abstract
Abstract
A procedure to mechanically force water into the bale structures of old corrugated container (OCC) material was studied and evaluated in low-consistency pulping studies. Two mechanical methods were used in the study: (1) roll pressing of sheets and (2) press wetting of bales. Mechanical pressing was first used in simple roll tests to evaluate nip pressure as an enhanced effect on wetting. Repeated press wetting treatments were found to increase water penetration into the sheets and appeared to lower wet strengths. A simple laboratory-scale bale pressing device was constructed and the effect of different parameters in wetting method was studied. We found that when a bale was pressed under water, multiple pressings were needed to get efficient press wetting. Increased temperature was found to increase water penetration inside the porous structure of linerboard. We also discovered that there must be a delay between relaxation and pressing to allow water to travel within a board and to wet all surfaces. The wetting procedure also evaluated the weight of water inside the bale. Results showed that the amount of water could be used as an indicator of the pulping kinetics and energy consumption needed to disintegrate OCC. The enhanced method (i.e., hydraulic pressing) could provide efficient wetting on an industrial scale. With this method, a 30% savings in the energy consumption required in pulping unit operation is possible.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. CEPI, “Key Statistics: European Pulp and Paper Industry 2013,” Confederation of European Paper Industries, Brussels, 2013. Available [Online] http://digibook.digi-work.com/Digibooks.aspx/Get/cepi/1191/Final_Key_statistics_2013.pdf <16Dec2015>.
2. Oliver, J.F., Agbezuge, L., and Woodcock, K., Colloids Surf., A 89(2–3):213(1994).10.1016/0927-7757(94)80120-7 ↗
3. Beuther, P.D., Veith, M.W., and Zwick K.J., J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 5(2):1(2010).10.1177/155892501000500201 ↗
4. Renvall, S., Kumar, V., Toivakka, M., et al., “Short time water absorption into multilayer curtain coated linerboard,” PaperCon 2013, TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2013, p. 192.
5. Holik, H., “Towards a better understanding of the defibering process,”Eng. Conf., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 1988, Bk-1, p. 19.
6. Washburn, E.W., Phys. Rev. 17(3):273(1921).10.1103/PhysRev.17.273 ↗
7. Kankaanpää, V., “Fundamental pulping research with pilot drum pulper,” TAPPI Fall Tech. Conf. Trade Fair, TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 2002, p. 443.
8. Pangalos, G., Monroe, J.A., Scogin, R.W., et al., “The effect of bale impregnation on recycled linerboard mill production,” Ann. Meet. Prepr.–Pulp Pap. Tech. Assoc. Can., 85th, Pulp and Paper Technical Association of Canada, Montreal, 1999, p. A67.
9. Carlson, W.E. and Stockel, I.H., “Bale impregnation of recovered paper mill, pilot, and laboratory results,” TAPPI Recycl. Symp., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 2000, p. 169.
10. Carlson, W.E. and Stockel, I.H., Prog. Pap. Recycl. 10(4): 37(2001).
11. Hubbe, M.A., Venditti, R.A., and Rojas, O.J., BioResources 2(4): 739(2007).10.15376/biores.2.1.1-2 ↗
12. Swanson, J.W. and Cordingly, S., Tappi 42(10): 812(1959).
13. Haynes, W.M. (Ed.), CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 96th edn., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015, pp. 1, 181.
14. Saville, F., Martinez, M., and Olson, J., Can. J. Chem. Eng. 93(3): 486(2015).10.1002/cjce.22149 ↗
15. Savolainen, A., Jussila, T., and Nikula, S., Tappi J. 74(11): 147(1991).