journal article·2019-12-01

Creating adaptive predictions for packaging-critical quality parameters using advanced analytics and machine learning

CYDNEY RECHTIN, CHITTA RANJAN, ANTHONY LEWIS, BETH ANN ZARKO

TAPPI Journal· Volume 18· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Packaging manufacturers are challenged to achieve consistent strength targets and maximize production while reducing costs through smarter fiber utilization, chemical optimization, energy reduction, and more. With innovative instrumentation readily accessible, mills are collecting vast amounts of data that provide them with ever increasing visibility into their processes. Turning this visibility into actionable insight is key to successfully exceeding customer expectations and reducing costs. Predictive analytics supported by machine learning can provide real-time quality measures that remain robust and accurate in the face of changing machine conditions. These adaptive quality “soft sensors” allow for more informed, on-the-fly process changes; fast change detection; and process control optimization without requiring periodic model tuning. The use of predictive modeling in the paper industry has increased in recent years; however, little attention has been given to packaging finished quality. The use of machine learning to maintain prediction relevancy under everchanging machine conditions is novel. In this paper, we demonstrate the process of establishing real-time, adaptive quality predictions in an industry focused on reel-to-reel quality control, and we discuss the value created through the availability and use of real-time critical quality.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fault Detection and Control Systems · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (6)

Show source-provided references
1. Chatterjee, S. and Simonoff, J.S., Handbook of Regression Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118532843.10.1002/9781118532843 ↗
2. Hogg, R.V., McKean, J.W., and Craig, A.T., Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, Pearson, Boston, MA, USA, 2019.
3. Biermann, C.J., Handbook of Pulping and Papermaking, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012097362-0/50026-1.10.1016/B978-012097362-0/50026-1 ↗
4. Osborne, J.W., Best Practices in Data Cleaning: A Complete Guide to Everything You Need to Do Before and After Collecting Your Data, SAGE Publishing, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452269948.10.4135/9781452269948 ↗
5. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A., Deep Learning, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016.
6. ProcessMiner, Atlanta, GA, USA. Available [Online] https://github.com/ProcessMiner/nlcor <27Nov2109>.