journal article·2018-08-01Open access

Influence of tensile straining and fibril angle on the stiffness and strength of previously dried kraft pulp fibers

John Long, Warren Batchelor

TAPPI Journal· Volume 17· Issue 07

Abstract

It has long been known that in individual wood fibers, the tensile mechanical properties are heavily determined by the nature of the cellulose chains in the fibers. Both elastic tensile modulus and strength are directly related to the fibril angle, which is the steepness with which the cellulose chains wind their way around the fiber in the secondary wall of the middle layer, named the S2 layer. Classic work from the 1970s measured modulus and strength in wood fibers as a function of the fibril angle and compared the results with theoretical models. The measurements were hampered by the presence of defects in the fibers, some which occurred naturally and others which resulted from pulp processing. In this study, we performed more accurate measurements of strength and modulus in single fibers of radiata pine by loading the fibers in cycles, gradually pulling some of the defects out of the fibers in an attempt to obtain defect-free values of modulus and strength. We then plotted these properties against measured fibril angle and compared our results with theoretical models. The results show that even when the fiber had reached maximum load before fracture, at a given value of fibril angle, it still had a measured modulus that is around half the theoretically expected value. The results suggest that the load required to fully remove defects from the fibers may be larger than the fibers can bear before fracturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Tree Root and Stability Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Barnett, J.R. and Bonham, V.A., Biol. Rev. 79(2): 461(2004).10.1017/S1464793103006377 ↗
2. Mark, R. and Gillas, P., in Handbook of Physical and Mechanical Testing of Paper and Paperboard (R. Mark, Ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York, 1983, vol. 1, chap. 10.
3. Donaldson, L., IAWA J. 29(4): 345(2008).10.1163/22941932-90000192 ↗
4. Courchene, C.E., Peter, G.F., and Litvay, J., Wood Fiber Sci. 38(1):112(2006).
5. Farber, J., Lichtenegger, H.C., Reiterer, A., et al., J. Mater. Sci.36(21): 5087(2001).10.1023/A:1012465005607 ↗
6. Fang, S.Z., Yang, W.Z., and Fu, X.X., J. For. Res. 15(4): 261(2004).10.1007/BF02844949 ↗
7. Reiterer, A., Lichtenegger, H., Tschegg, S., et al., Philos. Mag. A79(9): 2173(1999).10.1080/01418619908210415 ↗
8. Burgert, I., Frühmann, K., Keckes, J., et al., Trees 18(4): 480(2004).10.1007/s00468-004-0334-y ↗
9. Page, D.H., El-Hosseiny, F., Winkler, K., et al., Tappi 60(4):114(1977).
10. Page, D.H., El-Hosseiny, F., Winkler, K., et al., Pulp Pap. Mag. Can.73(8): 72(1972).
11. Mohlin, U.B., Dahlbom, J., and Hornatowska, J., TAPPI J. 79(6):105(1996).
12. Jentzen, C.A., Tappi 47(7): 412(1964).10.1093/jaoac/47.2.412 ↗
13. Bourmaud, A., Morvan, C., Bouali, A., et al., Ind. Crops Prod. 44:343(2013).10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.11.031 ↗
14. Wang, G., Yu, Y., Shi, S.Q., et al., Wood Fiber Sci. 43(3): 251(2011).
15. Keunecke, D., Eder, M., Burgert, I., et al., J. Wood Sci. 54:420(2008).10.1007/s10086-008-0970-8 ↗
16. Groom, L., Mott, L., and Shaler, S., Wood Fiber Sci. 34(1): 14(2002).10.1023/A:1026196806990 ↗
17. Mott, L., Groom, L., and Shaler, S., Wood Fiber Sci. 34(2): 221(2002).
18. Groom, L., Shaler, S., and Mott, L., Wood Fiber Sci. 34(2): 238(2002).
19. Eder, M., Jungnikl, K., and Bugert, I., Trees 23(1): 79(2009).10.1007/s00468-008-0256-1 ↗
20. Laivins, G.V. and Scallan, A.M., “The mechanism of hornification of wood pulps,” Transactions of the Tenth Fundamental Research Symposium, PIRA International, Leatherhead, UK, 1993.10.15376/frc.1993.2.1235 ↗
21. Fernandes-Diniz, J.M.B., Gil, M.H., and Castro, J.A.A.M., Wood Sci.Technol. 37(6): 489(2004).10.1007/s00226-003-0216-2 ↗
22. Page, D.H., Sven. Papperstidn. 88(5): R30(1985).
23. Page, D.H., in Fundamentals of Papermaking Transactions of the Ninth Fundamental Research Symposium (C.F. Baker
24. Wild, P.M., Provan, J.W., Guin, R., et al., TAPPI J. 82(4): 209(1999).
25. Conn, A.B. and Batchelor, W.J., Appita J. 52(4): 290(1999).
26. Kiiskinen, H., Paltakari, J., and Pakarinen, P., “Drying and paper quality,” in Papermaking Part 2: Drying (M. Karlsson, Ed.), Fapet Oy,Helsinki, 2000.
27. Keckes, J., Burgert, I., Frühmann, K., et al., Nat. Mater. 2: 810(2003).10.1038/nmat1019 ↗
28. Evans, R., Stuart, S.A., and Van der Touw, J., Appita J. 49(6):411(1996).10.1002/j.1550-8528.1996.tb00249.x ↗
29. Xu, L., Filonenko, Y., Li, M., et al., Appita J. 50(6): 501(1997).10.3406/enfan.1997.3082 ↗
30. Batchelor, W.J., Conn, A.B., and Parker, I.H., Appita J. 50(6):377(1997).10.1115/1.3101735 ↗
31. Mott, L., Shaler, S.M., and Groom, L.H., Wood Fiber Sci. 28(4):429(1996).
32. El-Hosseiny, F. and Page D.H., Wood Fiber 5(3): 208(1973).
33. Long, J.M., Conn, A.B., Batchelor, W.J., et al., Appita J. 53(3):206(2000).
34. El-Hosseiny, F. and Page, D.H., Fibre Sci. Technol. 8(1): 21(1975).10.1016/0015-0568(75)90012-3 ↗