Vapor-phase migration of DiBP and DBP through barrier-coated paperboard: Correlation between a permeation test method and simulated migration
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of the study was to construct a correlation between a permeation test method that simulates the migration of organic vapors and the actual migration of chemical contaminants from barrier-coated paperboard packaging. A correlation of this nature would enable manufacturers of barrier-coated paperboard to estimate the barrier properties of paperboard on a quality control level. A direct correlation was not plausible because the migration mechanisms that apply to the permeation test method and the actual migration differ. However, an indirect correlation was established. The permeation test method gave an indication of film integrity, whereas the actual migration was found to be rather dependent on coating weight. The spiking method, testing temperature, and vapor pressure of the contaminants were found to be variables directly affecting the validity of the correlation between permeation and migration methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Polymer Science and PVC
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Diesen, M., Economics of the Pulp and Paper Industry, 2nd edn., Finnish Paper Engineers’ Association, Helsinki, 2007, Chap. 1.
2. Escabasse, J.Y. and Ottenio, D., Food Addit. Contam. 19(Suppl): 79(2002).10.1080/02652030110103493 ↗
3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 21 CFR 176.260 - Pulp from reclaimed fiber, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2014. Available [Online] http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=176.260<16April2015>.
4. Triantafyllou, V.I., Akrida-Demertzi, K., and Demertzis, P.G., Food Chem. 101(4): 1759(2007).10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.02.023 ↗
5. Chatham, H., Surf. Coat. Technol. 78(1-3): 1(1996).10.1016/0257-8972(95)02420-4 ↗
6. Prins, W. and Hermans, J.J., J. Phys. Chem. 63(5): 716(1959).10.1021/j150575a017 ↗
7. Tiggelman, I., Pasch, H., and Hartmann, P.C., TAPPI J. 11(6): 41(2012).10.32964/TJ11.6.41 ↗
8. Poças, M.F., Oliveira, J.C., Pereira, J.R., et al., Food Control 22(2): 303(2001).10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.07.028 ↗
9. Weiss, J. and Leppin, C.H., Thin Solid Films 174(1): 155(1989).10.1016/0040-6090(89)90884-5 ↗
10. Rogers, C.E., in Polymer Permeability (J. Comyn, Ed.), Chapman & Hall, London, England, 1985, Chap. 2.
11. Klopffer, M.H. and Flaconneche, B., Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 56(3): 223(2001).10.2516/ogst:2001021 ↗
12. Stern, S.A. and Trohalaki, S., in Barrier Polymers and Structures (W.J. Koros, Ed.), American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1990, Chap. 2.
13. Weinkauf, D.H. and Paul, D.R., in Barrier Polymers and Structures(W.J. Koros, Ed.), American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1990, Chap. 3.
14. Triantafyllou, V.I., Akrida-Demertzi, K., and Demertzis, P.G., J. Chromatogr. A 1077(1): 74(2005).10.1016/j.chroma.2005.04.061 ↗
15. Australian Government Department of Health, National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS), Phthalates hazard assessment reports, Australian Government Department of Health, Sydney, Australia, 2007. Available [Online] http://www.nicnas.gov.au/chemical-information/other-assessmentreports/ phthalates-hazard-assessment-reports <14April2015>.