Biochemical methane potential of kraft bleaching effluent and codigestion with other in-mill streams
Source abstract
Abstract
A biochemical methane potential assay was conducted to investigate the anaerobic digestibility of bleaching effluent from hardwood kraft pulping and the potential of codigestion with other effluents from an integrated pulp and paper mill. Four in-mill streams were tested individually and in combination: total bleaching effluent, alkaline bleaching effluent, kraft evaporator condensate, and chemithermomechanical pulping effluent. The total bleaching effluent, consisting of the chlorine dioxide bleaching and alkaline bleaching effluents, exhibited the highest potential for organic matter degradation and methane generation. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal ranged from 57%–76%, and methane generation was 220–280 mL/g COD contained in the wastewater, depending on the degree of dilution. When codigestion was tested, the composite consisting of total bleaching effluent, chemithermomechanical pulping effluent, and kraft condensate was most efficient in terms of COD removal (51%) and methane generation (200 mL/g COD contained in the wastewater). The total bleaching effluent is the largest contributor to the overall amount of wastewater at this mill; it contains relatively low concentrations of anaerobic inhibitors such as adsorbable organic halogens (36 mg/L), total sulfur (170 mg/L), and resin and fatty acids (3.2 mg/L). Therefore, the total bleaching effluent from hardwood kraft pulping may be considered for full-scale anaerobic wastewater treatment, either as a singular stream or as part of a composite stream including other in-mill effluents.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production · Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques · Mine drainage and remediation techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Meyer, T. and Edwards, E.A., Water Res. 65: 321(2014).10.1016/j.watres.2014.07.022 ↗
2. Qiu, R., Ferguson, J.F., and Benjamin, M.M., Water Sci. Technol. 20(1):107(1988).10.2166/wst.1988.0014 ↗
3. Cornacchio, L.-A.T., “Anaerobic treatability of pulp and paper effluents,” M.A.Sc. thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, 1990.
4. Setiawan, Y., Soetopo, R.S., and Kristaufan, J.P., “Anaerobic treatment for bleaching effluent of pulp and paper mill,” Proc. Int. Semin. Chem., Indonesian
5. Chemical Society, 2008, p. 367. Available [Online] http://chemistry.unpad.ac.id/isc-proceeding/2008/Pdf/OP/0367-0372%20Yusup%20Setiawan.pdf <25Feb2016>.
6. Chaparro, T.R. and Pires, E.C., Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 28(4): 625(2011).10.1590/S0104-66322011000400008 ↗
7. Nilsson, B. and Strand, O., Water Sci. Technol. 29(5–6): 399(1994).10.2166/wst.1994.0733 ↗
8. Totzke, D., 2012 Anaerobic Treatment Technology Overview, Applied Technologies Inc., Brookfield, WI, USA, 2012.10.1016/S1365-6937(12)70020-5 ↗
9. Welander, T. and Andersson, P.-E., Water Sci. Technol. 17(1): 103(1985).10.2166/wst.1985.0008 ↗
10. Habets, L.H.A. and de Vegt, A.L., Water Sci. Technol. 24(3–4): 331(1991).10.2166/wst.1991.0489 ↗
11. Eis, B.J., Ferguson, J.F., and Benjamin, M.M., J. - Water Pollut. Control Fed. 55(11): 1355(1983).
12. Dufresne, R., Liard, A., and Blum, M.S., Water Environ. Res. 73(1): 103(2001).10.2175/106143001X138750 ↗
13. Yang, M.I., Edwards, E.A., and Allen, D.G., Water Sci. Technol. 62(10): 2427(2010).10.2166/wst.2010.980 ↗
14. Makris, S.P., “Removal of resin and fatty acids from pulp mill wastewater streams,” Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2003.
15. Larsson, M., Truong, X.-B., Björn, A., et al., Environ. Technol. 36(9–12): 1489(2015).10.1080/09593330.2014.994042 ↗
16. Owen, W.F., Stuckey, D.C., Healy Jr., J.B., et al., Water Res. 13:485(1979).10.1016/0043-1354(79)90043-5 ↗
17. Jirka, A.M. and Carter, M.J., Anal. Chem. 47(8): 1397(1975).10.1021/ac60358a004 ↗
18. Meyer, T., Yang, M.I., Allen, D.G., Tran, H.N. and Edwards, E.A. Environ. Eng. Sci. (submitted).
19. Batstone, D.J., Tait, S., and Starrenburg, D., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 102(5): 1513(2009).10.1002/bit.22163 ↗
20. Malmqvist, A. and Welander, T., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57: 2229(1991).10.1128/AEM.57.8.2229-2232.1991 ↗
21. Yu, P. and Welander, T., Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 40: 806(1994).10.1007/BF00173979 ↗
22. Schnell, A., Skog, S., and Sabourin, M.J., “Chemical characterization and biotreatability of alkaline-peroxide mechanical pulping effluents,” Environ. Conf. Exhib., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1993, p. 187.
23. Pfister , K. and Sjöström, E., Pap. Puu 61(4): 220(1979).
24. Bryant, P., Sundström, G., and Jour, P., “Ultrafiltration of alkaline filtrates to maximize partial closure of ECF bleach plants,” Int. Pulp Bleaching Conf., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 1998, p. 229.
25. Sågfors, P.E. and Starck, B. in Pulp Bleaching —Principles and Practice, TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 1996, p. 749.
26. Bullock, C.M., “The influence of the high molecular weight fraction of bleached kraft mill effluent on the biological activity of activated sludge,” M.A.Sc. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1994.
27. Gergov, M., Priha, M., Talko, E., et al., Tappi J. 71(12): 175(1988).
28. Dahl, O., “Evaporation of acidic effluent from kraft pulp bleaching, reuse of the condensate and further processing of the concentrate,” Ph.D. thesis, Oulu University, Oulu, Finland, 1999.