Design of refractory linings for balanced energy efficiency, uptime, and capacity in lime kilns
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work a computer model is used to examine how refractory linings with both high alumina and basic refractory bricks affect kiln operations. Recommendations are made based on the results to aid mill personnel in designing optimized refractory linings for specific situations. Kilns used to regenerate lime in the kraft process are highly energy intensive. Throughout the 1990s, in response to increasing fuel prices, the pulp and paper industry primarily used backup insulation in conjunction with high alumina brick to line calcining zones of their kilns. The dramatic decline in price of natural gas over the past decade, in combination with mounting pressures to increase production of existing assets, has led many mills to focus more on increasing uptime and capacity rather than on energy savings. To this end, a growing number of mills are using basic (magnesia based) brick instead of high alumina brick to line calcining zones. While the use of basic brick can increase the uptime and reduce the cost to maintain the refractory lining, it can dramatically increase the shell temperatures and heat losses. Tradeoffs, therefore, are created among energy efficiency, capacity, and uptime.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Metal Extraction and Bioleaching · Iron and Steelmaking Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Cahill, J., “Lime kiln.” Available [Online] from http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimcahill_emerson/204140963/sizes/o/in/photostream/<17Oct2012>.
2. “Pulp and paper industry energy bandwidth study.” Report for American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), Project Number: 16CX8700, Jacobs, Greenville, SC, USA and Atlanta, GA, USA, 2006. Available [Online] http://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/11/f4/doe_bandwidth.pdf <26May2010>.
3. Gorog, J.P. and Adams, T.N., TAPPI Kraft Recovery Operations Semin., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 1987, p. 41.10.2524/jtappij.41.168 ↗
4. Dietel, C., personal communication. 5. “Natural gas: Henry hub natural gas spot price.” Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy,
5. Washington. Available [Online] http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngwhhdM.htm <27Sept2012>.
6. “Petroleum and other liquids: refiner petroleum product prices by sales type.” Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington. Available [Online] http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_refoth_dcu_nus_m.htm <27Sept2012>.
7. Ince, P.J., Li, X., Zhou, M., et al., “United States paper, paperboard, and market pulp capacity trends by process and location, 1970–2000,” Research paper FPL-RP602, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA, 2001.
8. Gorog, J.P. and Fraser, D.G., Int. Chem. Recovery Conf., TAPPI PRESS, 1992, p. 441.
9. Hopp, W., “Refractory materials for lime kilns in the pulp industry ”Refratechnik Report No. 64, Refratechnik GmbH, Götingen, Germany, 2007.
10. Websdale, O., Downing, B., and Tran, H., Pulp Pap. Can. 110(8): 39(2009).
11. Ellis, M., Manning, R.P., Tran, H., et al., 62nd Appita Ann. Conf. Exhib., Appita, Bundoora, Australia, 2009, p. 57.
12. Gorog, J.P. and Adams, T.N., TAPPI Kraft Recovery Operations Semin., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 1986, p. 37.
13. Gorog, J.P., Leary, W.R., Wang, D., et al., “Computer modeling as a tool to estimate the impact of fuel type on the performance of kilns used to regenerate lime in the kraft process,” Int. Chem. Recovery Conf., Finnish Recovery Boiler Committee, Vantaa, Finland, 2014.
14. Bardes, B.P. (Ed.), Metals Handbook 9th Edn.—Vol. 1, Properties and Selection: Irons and Steels; American Society for Metals, Materials Park, OH, USA, 1978, pp. 639–663.