Using Short-Rotation, Intensively Managed Hardwood Plantations as "Green" Inventory for Southeastern U.S. Pulp Mills
Source abstract
Abstract
As a routine wood source for a pulp mill, recent studies have shown that intensively managed, short-rotation hardwood plantations are not cost effective. The objective of this study was to determine if these plantations may be cost effective as “green” inventory, replacing some portion of high cost remote woodyard inventory. Three southeastern U.S. pulp mills were used as case studies in a net present value analysis. Short-rotation hardwood plantations of eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) were simulated to replace a portion of remote woodyard inventory, with wood delivered to a pulp mill from this “green” inventory only when pulp mill inventory levels became critical. If this “green” inventory is not used, these plantations continue to grow until needed. With current yield from an experimental fiber farm, short-rotation plantations were not cost effective as “green” inventory. However, if yield could be increased approximately 33% through either genetic or cultural improvements, all three pulp mills could have reduced overall wood cost by establishing a fiber farm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Forest Management and Policy · Forest Biomass Utilization and Management · Bioenergy crop production and management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (10)
Show source-provided references
1. Gallagher, T.V., Shaffer, B., and Rummer, B., Biomass Bioenergy, 30: 794(2006).10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.08.004 ↗
2. Balatinecz, J.J. and Kretschmann, D.E., in Poplar Culture in North America (D.I. Dickmann, J.G. Isebrands, J.E. Eckenwalder, et. al., Eds.), NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2001, Chap. 9.
3. Bar, I., Proceedings of the Short-Rotation Woody Crops Operations Working Group, University of California, Davis, California, USA, 1998, pp. 81-84. Available online at http://www.woodycrops.org/reports/98_proceedings.pdf.
4. Gallagher, T.V., “Assessing the cost and operational feasibility of ‘green’ hardwood winter inventory for southeastern pulp mills,” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Tech College of Natural Resources, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, 2003. Available at http://scholar.lib. vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05302003-163928/unrestricted/TVGallagher.pdf.
5. Martin, A.L., personal communications re: inventory levels and costs for a hardwood consuming pulp mill, 2001.
6. LeBel, L. and Carruth J.S., Forest Prod. J. 47: 52(1997).10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03882-0 ↗
7. Lothner, D.C., Rose, D., Zavitkovski, J., et al., Proceedings, Energy from Biomass and Wastes: 5, Institute of Gas Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 1981, pp. 145-163.
8. Stanton, B., Eaton, J., Johnson, J., et al., J. Forestry, 100: 28(2002).10.1093/jof/100.4.28 ↗
9. Stanturf, J.A., Kellison, R.C., Broerman, F.S., et. al. J. Forestry, 101: 26(2003).10.1093/jof/101.3.26 ↗
10. Galbraith, J.E. and Meng, C.H., J. Forestry, 79: 292(1981).10.1093/jof/79.5.292 ↗