journal article·2021-02-01

The effect of microfibrillated cellulose on the wet-web strength of paper

JONATHAN PHIPPS, TOM LARSON, MARK PARADIS, DIANA TANASE

TAPPI Journal· Volume 20· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The wet-web strength of paper immediately after the press section of a paper machine is a critical factor in determining machine runnability. However, it is difficult to determine at commercial scale, because the web has to be broken and production interrupted in order to obtain a sample for measurement. The use of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) is believed to increase wet-web strength, as it has allowed filler level increases of 10% or more on many commercial paper machines. In this paper, we describe a laboratory method for estimating the effect of MFC on wet sheet strength after pressing, as well as actual measurements of wet-web strength from a pilot paper machine trial. These experiments have demonstrated the positive effect of MFC. At solids contents in the range typically observed after pressing, sheets with MFC at fixed filler content are significantly stronger, but also wetter, than those without it. When the use of MFC is combined with a typical increase in filler content, the wet web remains slightly stronger, but also becomes drier than the reference condition. These results are compatible with the theory put forward by van de Ven that wet-web strength is mainly a result of friction between entangled fibers, and they also suggest that the presence of MFC increases this friction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Material Properties and Processing · Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (10)

Show source-provided references
1. Svending, P., Phipps, J., and Skuse, D., “Microfibrillated Cellulose, a new dimension in papermaking,” Specialty Papers Europe Symp., TAPPI/Smithers Pira, Peachtree Corners, GA, USA/Leatherhead, UK, 2016.
2. Svending, P., Phipps, J., and Skuse, D., “New applications for microfibrillated cellulose in and on paper and Board,” PTS Pap. Board Symp., Papiertechnische Stiftung, Heidenau, Germany, 2016.
3. Belle, J. and Odermatt, J., Cellulose 23(4): 2249(2016).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0961-7.10.1007/s10570-016-0961-7 ↗
4. Campbell, W.B., “The cellulose-water relationship in papermak-ing,” Forest Service Bulletin 84, Department of the Interior, Forest Products Laboratories of Canada, Ottawa, 1933.
5. Page, D.H., J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 19(4): J175(1993).10.1108/eb016513 ↗
6. van de Ven, T.G.M., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47(19): 7250(2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie800423r.10.1021/ie800423r ↗
7. Alince, B., Vanerek, A., de Oliveira, M.H., et al., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J.21(5): 653(2006).https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2006-21-05-p653-658.10.3183/npprj-2006-21-05-p653-658 ↗
8. de Oliveira, M.H., Maric, M., and van de Ven, T.G.M., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 23(4): 426(2008).https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2008-23-04-p426-431.10.3183/npprj-2008-23-04-p426-431 ↗
9. Tejado, A. and van de Ven, T.G.M., “The strength of wet paper: capillary forces or entanglement friction?” Int. Pap. Coat. Chem. Symp., 7th, Pulp and Paper Technical Association of Canada, Brossard, QC, Canada, 2009.
10. de Oliveira, M.H., Tejado, A., and van de Ven, T.G.M., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 24(2): 141(2009).https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2009-24-02-p141-147.10.3183/npprj-2009-24-02-p141-147 ↗