Imaging of ink jet penetration in uncoated paper using microscopic techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
Ink penetration in paper is influenced by the structure of the interfiber and intrafiber void spaces and the surface characteristics of the fibers. This report describes new techniques to determine the influence of the fiber surfaces and the cell wall internal structure on ink spreading and penetration. The location and penetration of ink is demonstrated by optical, scanning electron, confocal laser scanning, and transmission electron (TEM) microscopy methods. Ink penetration, as determined by each of these methods, is compared. The hemicellulose of the fiber’s internal void surfaces can be determined by immunochemical labeling in conjunction with TEM imaging. We demonstrate this by using primary monoclonal antibodies with specificity for hemicellulose with a secondary colloidal gold marker. This technique provides a way to visualize the location of hemicelluloses inside the cell wall and on the surfaces of nanopores. Combining paper structure with fluid spreading and wicking models can identify the influence of fiber surfaces and the cell wall on drop absorption.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Dubé, M., Drolet, F., and Daneault, C., et al., Papermaking Res. Symp., University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland, 2009, p. 59.
2. Starov, V.M., Kostvintsev, S.R, Sobolev, V.D., et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 246(2): 372(2002a).10.1006/jcis.2001.8077 ↗
3. Starov, V.M, Velarde, M.G., and Zhdanov, S.A., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 252(2): 397(2002b).10.1006/jcis.2002.8450 ↗
4. Starov, V.M, Zhdanov, S.A., and Velarde, M.G., Langmuir 18(25): 9744(2002).10.1021/la025759y ↗
5. Kaneda, M., Rensing, K., and Samuels, L., J. Integr. Plant Biol. 52(2): 234(2010).10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00925.x ↗
6. Alleborn, N. and Raszillier, H., Chem. Eng. Sci. 50: 2071(2004).10.1016/j.ces.2004.02.006 ↗
7. Ramarao, B.V., Massoquete, A., Lavrykov, S., et al., Drying Technol. 21(10): 2007(2003).10.1081/DRT-120027044 ↗
8. Arthur, B., Lavrykov, S., and Ramarao, B.V., “Modeling and experimental investigation of the effect of surface roughness on spreading of ink drops on paper,”Progress in Paper Physics Seminar, TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010.
9. Holmstad, R., Ramaswamy, S., Goel, A., et al., Prepr. - Int. Pap. Phys. Conf., PAPTAC, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2003, p. 65.
10. Maloney, T.C and Paulapuro, H., J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 25(12): 430(1999).
11. Hyväluoma, J., Raiskinmäki, P., Jäsberg, A., et al., Phys. Rev. E: Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 73(3 Pt. 2): 036705(2006) [Epub].10.1103/PhysRevE.73.036705 ↗
12. Yang, L., Fogden, A. Pauler, N., et al., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 20(4): 399(2005).10.3183/npprj-2005-20-04-p423-429 ↗
13. Wu, S.P, Yung, K.C., Xu, L.H, et al., IEEE Trans. Electron. Packag. Manuf. 31(4): 291(2008).10.1109/TEPM.2008.2004554 ↗
14. Ozaki, Y., Bousfield, D.W., and Shaler, S.M., J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 31(1): 48(2005).
15. Ruel, K., Chevalier-Billosta, V., Guillemin, F., et al., Maderas: Cienc. Tecnol. 8(2): 107(2006).10.4067/s0718-221x2006000200004 ↗
16. Altaner, C., Knox, J.P, and Jarvis, M.C., BioResources 2(2): 284(2007).10.15376/biores.2.2.284-295 ↗
17. McCartney, L., Marcus, S., and Knox, J.P., J. Histochem. Cytochem. 53(4): 543(2005).10.1369/jhc.4B6578.2005 ↗
18. Ruel, K., in Science, Technology and Education of Microscopy: an Overview (A. Mendez-Vilas, Ed.), Formatex, Badajoz, Spain, 2003, No. 1, Vol. 2, pp. 445-454.
19. Griffith, C., Fine Structure Immunocytochemistry, Springer-Verlag, New York,1993.10.1007/978-3-642-77095-1 ↗