journal article·2023-02-28

Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Growth Promotion Mechanism of Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Induced by Black Phosphorus Nanosheets

Zhiqiang Xiong, Xuejiao Zhang, Jason C. White, Liwei Liu, Weimin Sun, Siyu Zhang, Jin Zeng, Shuo Deng, Daxu Liu, Xiaoli Zhao, Fengchang Wu, Qing Zhao, Baoshan Xing

ACS Nano· Volume 17· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

With the extensive production and application of black phosphorus (BP) nanosheets, release to the environment is inevitable, which raises concerns about the fate and effects of this two-dimensional (2D) material on sensitive receptors such as environmental microbes. Although the bacterial toxicity of BP nanosheets has been demonstrated, whether the biological response differs in pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains of a microorganism is unknown. Here, enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and nonpathogenic Escherichia coli DH5α ( E. coli DH5α), Escherichia coli k12 ( E. coli k12), and Bacillus tropicus ( B. tropicus ) are used to comparatively study the microbial toxicity of BP nanosheets. Upon exposure to BP nanosheets across a range of doses from 10 to 100 μg mL –1 for 12 h, EPEC experienced enhanced growth and E. coli DH5α and E. coli k12 were not affected, whereas B. tropicus exhibited clear toxicity. By combining transcriptome sequencing, proteome analysis, and other sensitive biological techniques, the mechanism of BP-induced growth promotion for EPEC was uncovered. Briefly, BP nanosheets activate the antioxidation system to resist oxidative stress, promote protein synthesis and secretion to attenuate membrane damage, enhance the energy supply, and activate growth-related pathways. None of these impacts were evident with nonpathogenic strains. By describing the mechanism of strain-dependent microbial effects, this study not only highlights the potential risks of BP nanosheets to the environment and to human health but also calls attention to the importance of model strain selection when evaluating the hazard and toxicity of emerging nanomaterials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National-Regional Joint Engineering Research Center for Soil Pollution Control and Remediation in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Integrated Agro-environmental Pollution Control and Management, Institute of Eco-environmental and Soil Sciences, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China

Key Laboratory of Pollution Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Department of Analytical Chemistry, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut 06504, United States

Li Dak Sum Marine Biopharmaceutical Research Center, Department of Marine Pharmacy, College of Food and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315832, China

State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States

Funding

Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program · Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Liaoning Province · Guangdong Academy of Sciences

References (78)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C8EN00266E10.1039/C8EN00266E ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2020.10025410.1016/j.mtphys.2020.100254 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0521810.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05218 ↗
4. 10.1039/C7MH00305F10.1039/C7MH00305F ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.10.00810.1016/j.actbio.2021.10.008 ↗
6. 10.1038/ncomms1407110.1038/ncomms14071 ↗
7. 10.1038/ncomms545810.1038/ncomms5458 ↗
8. 10.1039/C7NR08900G10.1039/C7NR08900G ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12231710.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122317 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.11243310.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112433 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20150573010.1002/adma.201505730 ↗
12. 10.1039/C9CY02278C10.1039/C9CY02278C ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13513810.1016/j.cej.2022.135138 ↗
14. 10.1002/advs.20180132110.1002/advs.201801321 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.06.00810.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.06.008 ↗
16. 10.1002/ppsc.20200016910.1002/ppsc.202000169 ↗
17. 10.1002/chem.20190513410.1002/chem.201905134 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.1c0173910.1021/acsami.1c01739 ↗
19. 10.1039/C9NJ04757C10.1039/C9NJ04757C ↗
20. 10.1039/C9EN00774A10.1039/C9EN00774A ↗
21. 10.1002/advs.20200303310.1002/advs.202003033 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.9b2061810.1021/acsami.9b20618 ↗
23. 10.1002/advs.20200303310.1002/advs.202003033 ↗
24. 10.1039/C8NR01715H10.1039/C8NR01715H ↗
25. 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.07010.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.070 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.04110.1016/j.watres.2013.07.041 ↗
27. 10.1186/s13568-014-0051-x10.1186/s13568-014-0051-x ↗
28. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.11539910.1016/j.envpol.2020.115399 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.10.01010.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.10.010 ↗
30. 10.1111/jam.1206410.1111/jam.12064 ↗
31. 10.1038/nature0653610.1038/nature06536 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20170346110.1002/adma.201703461 ↗
33. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-17293610.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-172936 ↗
34. 10.1089/ars.2010.337410.1089/ars.2010.3374 ↗
35. 10.1126/science.106344710.1126/science.1063447 ↗
36. 10.3109/0891060090344426710.3109/08910600903444267 ↗
37. 10.1186/1477-5956-7-4510.1186/1477-5956-7-45 ↗
38. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.0142010.3389/fmicb.2016.01420 ↗
39. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4621825.x10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4621825.x ↗
40. 10.1242/jcs.115.17.335710.1242/jcs.115.17.3357 ↗
41. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06518.x10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06518.x ↗
42. 10.1080/10934529.2018.142972710.1080/10934529.2018.1429727 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.01210.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.012 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.algal.2021.10237610.1016/j.algal.2021.102376 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.09910.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.099 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.01.01410.1016/j.jcis.2018.01.014 ↗
47. 10.1021/nn202699t10.1021/nn202699t ↗
48. 10.1021/nn202451x10.1021/nn202451x ↗
49. 10.1128/CMR.00023-1810.1128/CMR.00023-18 ↗
50. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.2010.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.20 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.11196910.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.111969 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.12.00910.1016/j.plaphy.2010.12.009 ↗
53. 10.1021/acsami.0c0029810.1021/acsami.0c00298 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.06.01110.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.06.011 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.11257910.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112579 ↗
56. 10.1073/pnas.210967111810.1073/pnas.2109671118 ↗
57. 10.1038/nbt.245810.1038/nbt.2458 ↗
58. 10.1074/jbc.274.37.2602710.1074/jbc.274.37.26027 ↗
59. 10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.12381810.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123818 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12354210.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123542 ↗
61. Hartstein S. · J. Exp. Microbiol. Immunol. · 2017 · 3 · 17
62. 10.1021/acs.est.5b0529810.1021/acs.est.5b05298 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.00810.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.008 ↗
64. 10.3109/1743539090330526010.3109/17435390903305260 ↗
65. 10.1039/D1EN01138C10.1039/D1EN01138C ↗
66. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.70583910.3389/fmicb.2021.705839 ↗
67. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1983.tb08058.x10.1111/j.1471-4159.1983.tb08058.x ↗
68. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.09.01810.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.09.018 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.08510.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.085 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.11810.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.118 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.watres.2022.11829210.1016/j.watres.2022.118292 ↗
72. 10.1128/AEM.01382-1810.1128/AEM.01382-18 ↗
73. 10.3390/ijms2207368810.3390/ijms22073688 ↗
74. 10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02722.x10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02722.x ↗
75. 10.1021/bi062025210.1021/bi0620252 ↗
76. 10.1128/AEM.00177-1910.1128/AEM.00177-19 ↗
77. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02097.x10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02097.x ↗
78. 10.1128/jb.107.2.391-396.197110.1128/jb.107.2.391-396.1971 ↗