journal article·2012-11-01

Systematic screening of biorefinery technologies at the early stage of design

JÉRÉMIE COHEN, PAUL STUART

TAPPI Journal· Volume 11· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Improving technology readiness and government support have helped some forestry companies to continue to develop their biorefinery strategies over the past few years, including that for ethanol production in some cases. These developing technologies have been proven at various scales, and data required for their evaluation are typically scarce and uncertain. How can forestry companies select the “best” technology among the many options available to them, given this complex and uncertain landscape? The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the use of an early stage design tool for screening biorefinery technologies, using ethanol production as an example. A set of multidisciplinary criteria are defined that can be interpreted by a stakeholder panel, and calculated based on publically-available data. Then, the criteria are interpreted and weighed using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) analysis in order to make a global evaluation of technologies relative to each other, and identify those that should not be further considered.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Forest Management and Policy · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Forest Biomass Utilization and Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Sims, R.E.H., Mabee, W., Saddler, J.N., et al., Bioresour. Technol. 101(6): 1570(2010).10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.046 ↗
2. Johnson, B., Johnson, T., Scott-Kerr, C., et al., Pulp Pap. Int. 51(10): 19(2009).
3. Thorp, B.A., Paper360° 3(3): 14(2008).
4. Thorp, B.A., “Comparison of Five Cellulosic Biofuel Pathways,” TAPPI Bioenergy Technologies Quarterly, 2010, First Quarter, p. 23.
5. Stuart, P.R., Pulp Pap. Can. 107(6): 13(2006).10.1177/1355835806069781 ↗
6. Cohen, J., Janssen, M., Chambost, V., et al., Pulp Pap. Can. 111(3): 24(2010).10.3917/pe.101.0111 ↗
7. Duarte, B.P.M., Comput. Oper. Res. 28(4): 357(2001).10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00122-7 ↗
8. Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W., Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming, Wiley, New York, 1961.
9. Keeney, R.L., Oper. Res. 30(5): 803(1982).10.1287/opre.30.5.803 ↗
10. Forest Products Association of Canada (FPAC), “Transforming Canada’s Forest Products Industry: Summary of Findings from the Future Bio-pathways Project,” 2010. Available [Online] www.fpac.ca/index.php/en/publications-viewer/478/.
11. Ng, D.K.S., Pham, V., El-Halwagi, M., et al., in Design for Energy and the Environment: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Foundations of Computer-Added Process Design (FOCAPD) (M.M. El-Halwagi and A.A. Linninger, Eds.), CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Saint Helier, UK, 2009, pp. 425-432.10.1201/9781439809136 ↗
12. Thorp, B.A., Thorp, B.A.-IV, Murdock-Thorp, L.D., Paper360° 3(4): 20(2008).
13. Thorp, B.A., Thorp, B.A.-IV, Murdock-Thorp, L.D., Paper360° 3(5): 12(2008).10.7748/nm.15.5.12.s15 ↗
14. Badger, P.C., “Ethanol from Cellulose: A General Review,” in Trends in New Crops and New Uses (J. Janick and A. Whipkey, eds.), ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA, USA, 2002.
15. MacDonald, T., Schuetzle, D., Tamblyn, G., et al., “Alcohol Fuels from Biomass – Assessment of Production Technologies,” Technical Report, California Energy Commission & TSS Consultants, 2007.
16. Delmas, M., Chem. Eng. Technol. 31(5): 792(2008).10.1002/ceat.200800052 ↗
17. CIMV, “CIMV - The Biorefinery Concept,” 2012, www.cimv.fr.
18. Peters, M.S., Timmerhaus, K.D., and West, R.E., Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th edn., McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003.