Comparisons of Initial Experiments and Reactor Model Predictions in High Temperature Black Liquor Gasification
Source abstract
Abstract
Pressurized high temperature black liquor gasification might significantly improve the efficiency of the energy and chemical recovery cycle in kraft pulping. The process, which is based on the entrained-flow principle, is under development, and a scale-up from an existing pilot gasifier is planned. We developed a self-consistent com-putational fluid dynamic (CFD) model, in conjunction with pilot gasifier experiments, as a tool for scale-up. This report compares model predictions against experimental pilot gasifier data. The agreement between model and experiments is encouraging in certain areas, but significant discrepancies resulted for other areas. Model predic-tions of global performance parameters, such as sulfate reduction efficiency and carbon conversion, are in reason-able agreement with the experiments, but the predicted gas composition differed significantly from results of the experiments. Direct measurements of quantities to validate the current model validation are difficult to obtain because of severe conditions in the gasifier, and many of the model comparisons are based on indirect values. Hence, it is difficult to judge whether the errors come from the experiment or the simulation. Before we can draw a definite conclusion about the model’s validity, improved in-situ measurements inside the gasifier are necessary and are currently under development.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes · Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Combustion and flame dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Larson, E.D., McDonald, G.W., Yang, W., et al, TAPPI J. 83(6): 1(2000).
2. Ekbom, T., Linblom, M., Berglin, N., et al, “Technical and commercial feasibility study of black liquor gasification with methanol/DME production as motor fuels for automotive uses – BLGMF,” ALTENER II program, contract no. 4.1030/Z/01-087/2001 (2003).
3. Frederick, W.J., TAPPI J. 82(9): 45(1999).
4. Lindblom, M. and Landälv, I., Proc. 2007 International Chemical Recovery Conference, PAPTAC, Quebec, Canada, 2007, P. 51.
5. Marklund, M., Tegman, R., and Gebart, R., Fuel 86: 1918(2007).10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.015 ↗
6. Scandinavian Pulp, Paper, and Board Testing Committee, SCAN-N 30:85 Green liquor - Alkaline analysis.
7. Scandinavian Pulp, Paper, and Board Testing Committee, SCAN-N 31:94 Green liquor - Hydrogen sulfide concentration.
8. Scandinavian Pulp, Paper, and Board Testing Committee, SCAN-N 6:85 Green liquor - Sulfate.
9. Emerson Process Management Documentation, Instructions Manual 90002929, 7th edn., 2003.
10. Wåg, K.J., Grace, T.M., and Kymäläinen, M., Preprints of the 1995 International Chemical Recovery Conference, PAPTAC, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1995, p. B35.
11. Jones, W.P. and Lindstedt, R.P., Combustion and Flame 73: 233(1988).10.1016/0010-2180(88)90021-1 ↗
12. Magnussen, B.F. and Hjertager, B.H., Proc. Combust. Instit., 16: 719(1976).10.1016/S0082-0784(77)80366-4 ↗
13. Marklund, M., Gebart, R., and Fletcher, D.F., Combust. Sci. Technol. 177(1):435 (2005).10.1080/00102200590908978 ↗
14. Lefebvre, A.H., Atomization and sprays, Hemisphere: New York, New York, USA, 1989.10.1201/9781482227857 ↗