Numerical analysis of the impact of rotor and screen hole plate design on the performance of a vertical pulper
Source abstract
Abstract
The dissolving of mechanical pulp is one of the most important process steps in stock preparation, since pulping occurs at the very beginning of the papermaking process. Efficient mixing of the pulp in a short amount of time is essential to achieve high furnish volume flow rates. The design of the rotor, as well as the pulper vat and inserts, significantly affects the overall performance of the pulper, such as mixing efficiency and power demand. Using advanced numerical methods such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can accelerate the development process. The CFD simulations allow for detailed analysis of flow phenomena, making it possible to study a real-size machine numerically. This approach is particularly advantageous because it can reduce the need for timeconsuming and costly experiments associated with scaling up test rigs. In this study, we compared two different rotor designs utilized in a vertical pulper and evaluated the numerical results with experimental data. Rotor A is designed for low turbulence and low power demand, while rotor B is designed for high turbulence with high power demand. The CFD results showed good agreement with the experimental measurements. We investigated how the rotor design influences the free fluid surface and the mixing efficiency. Our study also highlights the differences in results depending on whether water or furnish is simulated, which exhibit Newtonian or, respectively, non-Newtonian fluid behavior. Additionally, a detailed numerical investigation of various screen hole plate designs revealed that the newly developed hole design significantly reduces pressure loss compared to a standard drilled hole. This outcome was consistent for both types of fluids investigated: water and furnish.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Blechschmidt, J., Taschenbuch der Papiertechnik, 2nd edn., Hanser Verlag, Munich, 2013.10.1007/978-3-446-43701-2 ↗
2. J.M. Voith SE & Co. KG, internal documentation, Heidenheim, 2023.
3. Gorton-Hülgerth, A. and Kerr, J., “Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics in the development and optimization of stock preparation equipment,” PaperCon, TAPPI Press, Atlanta, 2011.
4. Baldyga, J., Henczky, M., and Makowski, L., Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 79(8): 895(2001). https://doi.org/10.1205/02638760152721109.10.1205/02638760152721109 ↗
5. Munz, J. and Schäfer, M., Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng.2:100043(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2020.100043.10.1016/j.cscee.2020.100043 ↗
6. Arratia, P.E., Kukura, J., Lacombe, J., et al., AIChE J. 62(7): 2310(2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.10847.10.1002/aic.10847 ↗
7. Aubin, J., Fletcher, D.F., and Xuereb, C., Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 28(1): 431(2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2003.04.001.10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2003.04.001 ↗
8. Aubin, J. and Xuereb, C., Chem. Eng. Sci. 61(1): 2913(2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2005.10.075.10.1016/j.ces.2005.10.075 ↗
9. Blanco, A., Negro, C., Fuente, E., et al., Chem. Eng. Process. 46(1): 37(2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2006.04.003.10.1016/j.cep.2006.04.003 ↗
10. Xie, L., Wang, Q.-A., Luo, X.-J., et al., Int. J. Chem. Eng. 17(7):1(2019). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2018-0293.10.1515/ijcre-2018-0293 ↗
11. Li, Z., Chang, J., Yang, C., et al., Chem. Eng. Process. 166(1): 1(2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2021.108463.10.1016/j.cep.2021.108463 ↗
12. Britz, M., Grashof, B., and Osti, N., “Numerical simulation of a low con-sistency single-disc refiner including analysis of experimental rheologi-cal data,” TAPPICon, TAPPI Press, Peachtree Corners, GA, USA, 2021.
13. Ng, K., Fentiman, N.J., Lee, K.C., et al., Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 76(6): 737(1998). https://doi.org/10.1205/026387698525315.10.1205/026387698525315 ↗
14. Menter, F.R., AIAA J. 32(8): 1598(1994). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149.10.2514/3.12149 ↗
15. Hirt, C.W. and Nichols, B.D., J. Comput. Phys. 39(1): 201(1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5.10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5 ↗
16. Schäffer, V., “Numerische Untersuchung des Strömungseinflusses unterschiedlicher Siebplattenlochgeometrien auf die Effizienz eines exzentrischen Rührbottichs zum Einsatz in der Stoffaufbereitung von Papiermaschinen” (in German), T2000 student research project thesis, DHBW Heidenheim, Germany, 2020.
17. Duffy, G.G., Appita J. 48(1): 51(1995).10.1063/1.2807874 ↗
18. Ventura, C., Garcia, F., Ferreira, P., et al., TAPPI J. 7(8): 20(2008). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ7.8.20.10.32964/TJ7.8.20 ↗