journal article·2022-05-01Open access

Effects of agitator blade scaling on mixing in dissolving tanks

Patrick Gareau, Markus Bussman, Nikolai DeMartini

TAPPI Journal· Volume 21· Issue 4

Abstract

Hard calcium carbonate scale often forms on the agitators in smelt dissolving tanks. The effects of this scale on mixing are not well understood. While mixing in tanks has often been modeled in the literature, there have been no studies involving agitator scaling. To better understand the impact of agitator scaling on hydrodynamics and tank concentrations, a steady state, three-dimensional (3D) model has been developed for a smelt dissolving tank at a kraft pulp mill. In this work, four cases are compared: an agitator with no scaling, mild scaling, moderate scaling, and extreme scaling. The extreme scaling case is representative of scale buildup on a dissolving tank agitator that was significant enough that the agitator had to be stopped and cleaned. The reduction in the agitator fluid jet velocity is relatively small for the mild and moderate scaling cases, but it becomes more significant for the extreme scaling case, for which the results indicate that the mixing of the smelt with the weak wash is likely poor and that there would thus be a risk of smelt pooling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Mixing · Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Giglio, A., Björk, M., Wadsborn, R., et al., TAPPI J. 19(8): 387(2020). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ19.8.387.10.32964/TJ19.8.387 ↗
2. Jin, E., Bussmann, M., and Tran, H., TAPPI J. 14(6): 385(2015). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ14.6.385.10.32964/TJ14.6.385 ↗
3. Jin, E., “Smelt droplet-water interaction in the kraft recovery boiler dissolving tank,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, 2017.
4. Cho, D., “Computational fluid dynamics modeling of dissolving tank hydrodynamics,” MASc thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, 2020.
5. Torotwa, I. and Ji, C., Designs 2(1): 2010010(2018).https://doi.org/10.3390/designs2010010.10.3390/designs2010010 ↗
6. Zamankhan, P., Chem. Eng. Technol. 33(3): 508(2010).https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200900347.10.1002/ceat.200900347 ↗
7. Cao, H., Amador, C., Jia, X., et al., Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 114:108(2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.08.012.10.1016/j.cherd.2016.08.012 ↗
8. Pakzad, L., Ein-Mozaffari, F., Upreti, S.R., et al., Can. J. Chem. Eng. 91: 90(2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.21616.10.1002/cjce.21616 ↗
9. Zadravec, M., Basic, S., and Hribersek, M., J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2(2): 126(2007).
10. Madhania, S., Cahyani, A.B., Nurtono, T., et al., IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 316: 012014(2018).https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/316/1/012014.10.1088/1757-899x/316/1/012014 ↗
11. Hernández-Jaramillo, D.C., Nieto-Londoño, C., Álvarez-Sarmiento, N., et al., Iteckne 12(1): 25(2014).https://doi.org/10.15332/iteckne.v12i1.818.10.15332/iteckne.v12i1.818 ↗
12. Madhania, S., Fathonah, N.N., Kusdianto, et al., MATEC Web Conf. 333: 02003(2021). https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202133302003.10.1051/matecconf/202133302003 ↗
13. ANSYS, “Chapter 9: Modeling flows with moving reference frames,” in ANSYS Fluent, 19.1, Help System, User Guide, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA, 2019, pp. 997-1020.10.1016/b978-0-12-811768-2.00022-5 ↗
14. ANSYS, “Chapter 10: Modeling flows using sliding and dynamic meshes,” in ANSYS Fluent, 19.1, Help System, User Guide, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA, 2019, pp. 1021-1142.10.1016/b978-0-12-811768-2.00022-5 ↗
15. Lin, Z., “Characterizing smelt shattering in recovery boilers,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, 2014.
16. ANSYS, “Chapter 4: Turbulence,” in ANSYS Fluent, 19.1, Help System, Theory Guide, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA, 2019, pp. 39-140.10.1016/b978-0-12-811768-2.00022-5 ↗
17. ANSYS, “Chapter 17: Multiphase flows,” in ANSYS Fluent, 19.1, Help System, Theory Guide, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA, 2019, pp. 505-652.10.1016/b978-0-12-811768-2.00022-5 ↗
18. ANSYS, “Chapter 21: Solver theory,” in ANSYS Fluent, 19.1, Help System, Theory Guide, ANSYS Inc., 2019, pp. 679-740.
19. ANSYS, “Chapter 17: Generating polyhedral meshes,” in ANSYS Fluent, 19.1, Help System, User Guide, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA, 2019, pp. 267-272.10.1016/b978-0-12-811768-2.00022-5 ↗