Boiler retrofit improves efficiency and increases biomass firing rates
Source abstract
Abstract
Domtar’s fluff pulp mill in Plymouth, NC, USA, operates two biomass/hog fuel fired boilers (HFBs). For energy consolidation and reliability improvement, Domtar wanted to decommission the No. 1 HFB and refurbish/retrofit the No. 2 HFB. The No. 2 HFB was designed to burn pulverized coal and/or biomass on a traveling grate. The steaming capacity was 500,000 lb/h from coal and 400,000 lb/h from biomass. However, it had never sustained this design biomass steaming rate. As the sole power boiler, the No. 2 HFB would need to sustain 400,000 lb/h of biomass steam during peak loads. An extensive evaluation by a combustion and boiler technologies supplier was undertaken. The evaluation involved field testing, analysis, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling, and it identified several bottle-necks and deficiencies to achieving the No. 2 HFB’s biomass steam goal. These bottlenecks included an inadequate combustion system; insufficient heat capture; excessive combustion air temperature; inadequate sweetwater con-denser (SWC) capacity; and limited induced draft fan capacity. To address the identified deficiencies, various upgrades were engineered and implemented. These upgrades included modern pneumatic fuel distributors; a modern sidewall, interlaced overfire air (OFA) system; a new, larger economizer; modified feedwater piping to increase SWC capacity; replacement of the scrubber with a dry electro-static precipitator; and upgraded boiler controls. With the deployment of these upgrades, the No. 2 HFB achieved the targeted biomass steaming rate of 400,000 lb/h, along with lowered stack gas and combustion air temperatures. All mandated emissions limit tests at 500,000 lb/h of steam with 400,000 lb/h of biomass steam were passed, and Domtar reports a 10% reduction in fuel firing rates, which represents significant fuel savings. In addition, the mill was able to decommission the No. 1 HFB, which has substantially lowered operating and maintenance costs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Bioenergy crop production and management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (6)
Show source-provided references
1. La Fond, J.F., Keathley, D.C., Lantz, D., et al., “Combustion of clarifier underflow solids in a hog fuel boiler with a new high energy air system,” TAPPI Eng. Conf., TAPPI Press, Peachtree Corners, GA, USA, 1994, p. 715.
2. Walsh, A.R., Dayton, C.R., and Averett, J.A., “Elements of a successful bark boiler upgrade,” TAPPI Eng. Conf., Peachtree Corners, GA, 2000.
3. Pethe, S.J., Dayton, C.R., Bastianelli, R.R., et al., “Biomass replaces coal at the Hibbard Power Generation Facility,” Fluidized Bed Combustion XXVI and Stoker Fired Boiler Operations and Performance Conf., Council of Industrial Boiler Owners, Warrenton, VA, USA, 2013.
4. Pethe, S.J., Cloninger, P.W., Friedrich, T.L., et al., “Port Townsend Paper’s boiler MACT success story—Part I: Combustion system upgrade,” TAPPI PEERS Conf., TAPPI Press, Peachtree Corners, GA, 2016.
5. Pethe, S.J., Tebbetts, R.G., Britt, M.L., et al., “Multi-fuel boiler combustion system upgrade and controls optimization,” 27th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, European Innovation Partnership for Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability (EIP-AGRI), European Commission, Brussels, 2019.
6. Campbell Jr., J.S., Henderson, M.A., Berz, M.D., et al.,“Combustion system upgrade on CKPI’s biomass-fired boiler,” TAPPI PEERS Conf., TAPPI Press, Peachtree Corners, GA, 2019.