Measurement of the dynamics of fluid sorption for tissue papers
Source abstract
Abstract
Liquid absorption ability belongs to the most important features of tissue papers. Due to non-homogeneous internal and superficial structures, precise and fast evaluation of this property is challenging. The main aim of the presented research was to design an experimental device dedicated to the measurement of the kinetics of wetting phenomenon for tissue papers. The second aim was to evaluate whether it was possible to use image analysis for more precise characterization of liquid absorption properties of tissue paper. The obtained results showed that the method used, based on image analysis supported by gravimetric methods, proved to efficiently and quantitatively characterize the dynamics of liquid absorption for tissue papers. Supplementary parameters such as absorption anisotropy and in-plane velocity were obtained. Different experimental results were obtained for various tissue paper grades. Furthermore, water absorption capacity calculated from image analysis data correlated with results obtained according to the standard method EN ISO 12625-8:2010 “Tissue paper and tissue products—Part 8: Water-absorption time and water-absorption capacity, basket-immersion test method.” Hence, the presented device quantitatively characterizes and discriminates water absorption phenomenon for tissue papers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Textile materials and evaluations · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Beuther, P.D., Veith, M.W., and Zwick, K.J., J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 5(2):1(2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/155892501000500201.10.1177/155892501000500201 ↗
2. Young, C.K, Jin, H.L., Hyoung, J.K., et al., J. Korea TAPPI 48(5):85(2016). https://doi.org/10.7584/JKTAPPI.2016.10.48.5.85.10.7584/JKTAPPI.2016.10.48.5.85 ↗
3. Lucas, R., Kolloid-Z. 23(15): (1918). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01461107.10.1007/BF01461107 ↗
4. Washburn, E.W., Phys. Rev. 17: 271(1921). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.17.273.10.1103/PhysRev.17.273 ↗
5. Bosanquet, C.H., Philos. Mag. 45: 525(1923). https://doi.org/10.1080/14786442308634144.10.1080/14786442308634144 ↗
6. Nederveen, C.J., Tappi J. 77(12): 74(1994).
7. Rosenholm, J.B., Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 220: 8(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2015.01.009.10.1016/j.cis.2015.01.009 ↗
8. Joos, P., van Remoortere, P., and Bracke, M., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 136: 189(1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(90)90089-7.10.1016/0021-9797(90)90089-7 ↗
9. Songok, J., Salminen, P., and Toivakka, M., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 418: 373(2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.12.017.10.1016/j.jcis.2013.12.017 ↗
10. Palakurthi, N.K., Konangi, S., and Ghia, U., Int. J. Multiphase Flow 77: 48(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.07.010.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.07.010 ↗
11. Bico, J. and Quéré, D., Europhys. Lett. 61(3): 348(2003). https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2003-00196-9.10.1209/epl/i2003-00196-9 ↗
12. Schoelkopf, J., Gane, P.A.C., Ridgway, C.J., et al., Colloids Surf., A 206(1): 445(2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00066-3.10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00066-3 ↗
13. Carstens, F., Gamelas, J.A.F., and Schabel, S., Cellulose 24:295(2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1079-7.10.1007/s10570-016-1079-7 ↗
14. Gabrielsson, A., Vomhoff, H., and Tysen, A., “Investigation of the dynamic liquid absorption properties of kitchen towel,” PaperCon, TAPPI Press, Peachtree Corners, GA, USA, 2014.
15. Skowronski, J., Gruener, G., and DeGroot W., “Ultrasonic systems for liquid absorption measurement: Part. 2. Validation of ultrasonic testing for liquid absorption uniformity,” Papermaking Conf., TAPPI Press, Peachtree Corners, 2005.
16. Olejnik, K., Pelczynski, P., Bogucka, M., et al., Measurement 115(1): 52(2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.10.020.10.1016/j.measurement.2017.10.020 ↗
17. Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., and Frise, E., Nat. Methods 9(7): 676(2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019.10.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗