Factors affecting particulate removal efficiency of kraft recovery boiler electrostatic precipitators: a technical review
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) are used in most pulp mills to remove particulate from recovery boilers, power boilers, and lime kilns. As environmental regulations have become increasingly stringent in recent years, maintaining high ESP performance is of vital importance in mill operation. This paper discusses results of a literature review of the ESP technology used in industrial combustion units, including recovery boilers, as well as results of a parametric study using the well-known Deutsch-Anderson equation to correlate recovery boiler operating conditions with ESP collection efficiency. The results show that for particles up to about 0.3 μm, the ESP collection efficiency decreases drastically with increased particle size and with decreased temperature. For particles larger than 0.5 μm, however, the trend reverses; the collection efficiency increases with increased particle size and decreased temperature. The results also suggest that the particle concentration (or loading) in the flue gas has no effect on collection efficiency and that sodium chloride particles are more readily captured than sodium sulfate particles. The latter prediction, however, appears to be in contradiction with mill experience that sodium chloride particles are more difficult to capture.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation · Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. White, H.J., Industrial Electrostatic Precipitation, Addison-Wesley,Reading, MA, USA, 1965.
2. White, H.J., J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 7(3): 166(1957).10.1080/00966665.1957.10467797 ↗
3. Arif, S., Branken, D.J., Everson, R.C., et al., J. Electrost. 84:10(2016).10.1016/j.elstat.2016.08.008 ↗
4. Long, Z. and Yao, Q., J. Aerosol Sci. 41(7): 702(2010).10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.04.005 ↗
5. Skodras, G., Kaldis, S.P., Sofialidis, D., et al., Fuel Process. Technol.87(7): 623(2006).10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.01.012 ↗
6. Ning, Z., Podlinski, J., Shen, X., et al., J. Electrost. 80: 76(2016).10.1016/j.elstat.2016.02.001 ↗
7. Haque, S.M.E., Rasul, M.G., Deev, A.V., et al., Appl. Therm. Eng .29(10): 2037(2009).10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.10.019 ↗
8. Varonos, A.A., Anagnostopoulos, J.S., and Bergeles, G.C., J.Electrost. 55(2): 111(2002).10.1016/S0304-3886(01)00187-5 ↗
9. McCain, J.D., Gooch, J.P., Smith, W.B., J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc .25(2): 117(1975).10.1080/00022470.1975.10470056 ↗
10. Jedrusik, M., Jedrusik, J., and Sarna, M., “Industrial Scale study of a retrofitted electrostatic precipitator,” Proc. Int. Conf. Electrost. Precip., 7th, International Society for Electrostatic Precipitation, Atlanta, 1998.
11. Lind, T., Hokkinen, J., Jokiniemi, J.K., et al., J. Environ. Sci. Technol.40(2): 584(2006).10.1021/es0503027 ↗
12. Noda, N. and Makino, H. Adv. Powder Technol. 21(4): 495(2010).10.1016/j.apt.2010.04.012 ↗
13. Jedrusik, M. and S`wierczok, A. in Air Pollution—Monitoring, Modelling, Health and Control (D.M. Khare, Ed.), InTech, London, 2012, pp. 197–220.
14. Nouri, H., Zouzou, N., Dascalescu, L., et al., Process Saf. Environ. Prot.104: 225(2016).10.1016/j.psep.2016.09.001 ↗
15. Adamiak, K., IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 38(4): 1001(2002).10.1109/TIA.2002.800562 ↗
16. Yu, D., Castle, G.S.P., and Adamiak, K., IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 46(3):1159(2010).10.1109/TIA.2010.2045324 ↗
17. Tomei, G.L., Steam: Its Generation and Use, 42nd edn., Babcock &Wilcox, Charlotte, NC, USA, 2015, pp. 32–38.
18. Nichols, G.B., IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. IA–13(1): 74(1977).10.1109/TIA.1977.4503366 ↗
19. Sretenovic, I., Farkhondehkavaki, M., Kortschot, M., et al., TAPPI J.13(7): 31(2014).10.32964/TJ13.7.31 ↗
20. Tran, H.N., Tappi J. 82(1): 212(1999).
21. Deutsch, W., Ann. Phys. (Berlin, Ger.) 373(12): 335(1922).10.1002/andp.19223731203 ↗
22. Anderson, E., Chem. Metall. Eng. 26: 151(1922).10.1017/S239818730013840X ↗
23. Matts, S. and Öhnfeldt, P.-O., Flakten Rev. 6–7: 105(1964).
24. Duhamel, M., Tran, H., and Frederick, W.J. Jr., TAPPI J. 3(10):25(2004).
25. Samuelsson, I.L., “Effect of salt cake properties on precipitator performance,” Prepr.—PAPTAC Annu. Meet., 86th, Pulp and Paper Technical Association of Canada, Montreal, 2000.
26. Al-Hamouz, Z., Energy Convers. Manage. 79: 487(2014).10.1016/j.enconman.2013.11.047 ↗
27. Xu, X., Gao, X., Yan, P., et al., Sep. Purif. Technol. 143: 184(2015).10.1016/j.seppur.2015.01.016 ↗