journal article·2015-03-01

Dimensioning a recovery boiler furnace using mathematical optimization

VILJAMI MAAKALA, PASI MIIKKULAINEN

TAPPI Journal· Volume 14· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Capacities of the largest new recovery boilers are steadily rising, and there is every reason to expect this trend to continue. However, the furnace designs for these large boilers have not been optimized and, in general, are based on semiheuristic rules and experience with smaller boilers. We present a multiobjective optimization code suitable for diverse optimization tasks and use it to dimension a high-capacity recovery boiler furnace. The objective was to find the furnace dimensions (width, depth, and height) that optimize eight performance criteria while satisfying additional inequality constraints. The optimization procedure was carried out in a fully automatic manner by means of the code, which is based on a genetic algorithm optimization method and a radial basis function network surrogate model. The code was coupled with a recovery boiler furnace computational fluid dynamics model that was used to obtain performance information on the individual furnace designs considered. The optimization code found numerous furnace geometries that deliver better performance than the base design, which was taken as a starting point. We propose one of these as a better design for the high-capacity recovery boiler. In particular, the proposed design reduces the number of liquor particles landing on the walls by 37%, the average carbon monoxide (CO) content at nose level by 81%, and the regions of high CO content at nose level by 78% from the values obtained with the base design. We show that optimizing the furnace design can significantly improve recovery boiler performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Building Energy and Comfort Optimization · Radiative Heat Transfer Studies · Advanced Control Systems Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Engblom, M., Miikkulainen, P., Brink, A., et al., TAPPI J. 11(11): 19(2012).10.32964/TJ11.11.19 ↗
2. Bergroth, N., Engblom, M., Mueller, C., et al., TAPPI J. 9(2): 6(2010).10.32964/TJ9.2.6 ↗
3. Engblom, M., Bergroth, N., Mueller, C., et al., TAPPI J. 9(2): 15(2010).10.32964/TJ9.2.15 ↗
4. Vakkilainen, E., Kjäldman, L., Taivassalo, V., et al., Int. Chem. Recovery Conf., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1998, p. 245.
5. Mueller, C., Eklund, K., Forssen, M., et al., Int. Chem. Recovery Conf., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 2004, p. 979
6. Grace, T.M., Lien, S., Schmidl, W., et al., Int. Chem. Recovery Conf., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 1998, p. 271.
7. Thévenin, D. and Janiga, G. (Eds.), Optimization and Computational Fluid Dynamics, Springer, Berlin, 2008.10.1007/978-3-540-72153-6 ↗
8. Giannakoglou, K.C., Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 38(1): 43(2002).10.1016/S0376-0421(01)00019-7 ↗
9. Saario, A., “Mathematical modeling and multiobjective optimization in development of low-emission industrial boilers,” Ph.D. thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland, 2008.
10. Foli, K., Okabe, T., Olhofer, M., et al., Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 49(5): 1090(2006).10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.08.032 ↗
11. Tahara, Y., Tohyama, S., and Katsui, T., Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 52(5): 499(2006).10.1002/fld.1178 ↗
12. Safikhani, H., Hajiloo, A., and Ranjbar, M.A., Comput. Chem. Eng. 35(6): 1064(2011).10.1016/j.compchemeng.2010.07.017 ↗
13. Mohamed, M.H., Janiga, G., Pap, E., et al., Energy 36(1): 438(2011).10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.021 ↗
14. Madsen, J.I., Shyy, W., and Haftka, R.T., AIAA J. 38(9): 1512(2000).10.2514/2.1160 ↗
15. Soto, O., Löhner, R., Yang, C., Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 14(6): 734(2004).10.1108/09615530410544292 ↗
16. Fazzolari, A., Gauger, N.R., and Brezillon, J., J. Comput. Appl. Math. 203(2): 548(2007).10.1016/j.cam.2006.04.013 ↗
17. Cvetkovic’, D. and Parmee, I.C., IEEE Trans. Evolu. Comput. 6(1): 42(2002).10.1109/4235.985691 ↗
18. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., et al., IEEE Trans. Evolu. Comput. 6(2): 182(2002).10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
19. Duvigneau, R. and Visonneau, M., Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 44(11): 1257(2004).10.1002/fld.688 ↗
20. Miikkulainen, P., Pakarinen, L., and Metsämuuronen, N., Int. Chem. Recovery Conf., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 2010, p. 60.
21. Saviharju, K., Pakarinen, L., Wag, K., et al., Int. Chem. Recovery Conf., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 2004, p. 247
22. Saviharju, K., Pakarinen, L., Kyttälä, J., et al., “Modelling and feedback measurements give new understanding about recovery boiler behavior,” 7th Int. Colloq. Black Liquor Combust. Gasif., Jyväskylä, Finland, Available [Online] http://www.eng.utah.edu/~whitty/blackliquor/colloquium2006/presentations/3.1%20-%20Saviharju%20-%20Modelling%20and%20Feedback%20 for%20RB.pdf <25Feb2015>.
23. Saviharju, K., Pakarinen, L., Kyttälä, J., et al., Int. Chem. Recovery Conf., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 2007, p. 469.
24. Patankar, S.V. and Spalding, D.B., Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 15(10): 1787(1972).10.1016/0017-9310(72)90054-3 ↗
25. Launder, B.E. and Sharma, B.I., Lett. Heat and Mass Transfer 1(2): 131(1974).10.1016/0094-4548(74)90150-7 ↗
26. ANSYS Inc., “P-1 radiation model theory,” in Fluent 14.0 Theory Guide, Canonsburg, PA, USA, 2011.
27. ANSYS Inc., “The generalized finite-rate formulation for reaction modeling,” in Fluent 14.0 Theory Guide, Canonsburg, PA, 2011.
28. ANSYS Inc., “Discrete phase,” in Fluent 14.0 Theory Guide, Canonsburg, PA, 2011.
29. Kankkunen, A. and Miikkulainen, P., “Particle size disribution of black liquor sprays with a high-solids content in recovery boilers,” IFRF Combustion J. [online] Article No. 200308, December 2003.
30. Miikkulainen, P. and Kankkunen, A., Järvinen, M., et al., TAPPI J. 8(1): 36(2009).10.32964/TJ8.1.36 ↗
31. Kankkunen, A., Miikkulainen, P., Järvinen, M., TAPPI PEERS Conf., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 2011, p. 434.
32. Vakkilainen, E., Kraft Recovery Boilers—Principles and Practice, Suomen Soodakattilayhdistys, Helsinki, 2005.