journal article·2013-10-01

Detailed characterization of poor settling green liquor dregs

KEVIN TAYLOR

TAPPI Journal· Volume 12· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

At a northern bleached softwood kraft (NBSK) mill in western Canada, poor settling green liquor dregs caused high non-process element levels in lime mud and white liquor pressure filter plugging. Dregs samples were collected during poor settling and normal settling conditions. Samples were examined by qualitative analysis, elemental analysis, quantitative X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscope/energy dispersion X-ray (SEM/EDX) spectroscopy. Poor settling dregs were caused by an inorganic gelatinous material. The inorganic gel was determined to be an amorphous magnesium silicate compound of approximate composition Mg2(Si1-xAlx)O4, with a molar ratio of silicon to aluminum of approximately 5:1. The density of the inorganic gel was only slightly higher than the green liquor, causing it to settle very slowly. When calcite particles were trapped by the gel, the average density increased, which increased the settling rate. The inorganic gel was present during normal settling, but contained more aluminum (silicon to aluminum ratio of approximately 2:1). During normal settling, the gel was more dense and contained more trapped particles of calcite.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications · Bauxite Residue and Utilization · Materials Engineering and Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (9)

Show source-provided references
1. Lidén, J., “Green Liquor Dregs: Its Origin and Effects in the Lime Cycle,” Int. Chem. Recovery Conf., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1995, Book A, p. A291.
2. Löwnertz, P., Ingleman, M., and Wimby, M., “Green Liquor Filtration – Implementation and Performance in the Modern Kraft Mill,” 5th Int. Conf. New Available Techniques, Proc., Swedish Association of Pulp and Paper Engineers, Stockholm, Sweden, 1996, Part II, p. 770.
3. Ulmgren, P., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2(1): 4(1987).10.3183/npprj-1987-02-01-p004-009 ↗
4. Bellotto, M., Rebours, B., Clause, O., et al., J. Phys. Chem. 100(20): 8527(1996).10.1021/jp960039j ↗
5. Richardson, B., Uloth, V., Löwnertz, P., et al., “Behaviour of Non-Process Elements in the Kraft Recovery System,” Int. Chem. Recovery Conf., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 1998, p. 1025.
6. Martins, F.M., Martins, J.M., Ferracin, L.C., et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 147(1-2): 610(2007).10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.057 ↗
7. Taylor, K. and McGuffie, B., Pulp Pap. Can. 108(2): T24(2007).
8. Taylor, K. and Nasr-El-Din, H.A., U.S. pat. 6,660,694 (December 9, 2003).
9. Nasr-El-Din, H.A. and Taylor, K.C., J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 48(3-4): 141(2005).10.1016/j.petrol.2005.06.010 ↗