journal article·2015-06-01

Analysis of the effects of pressure profile, furnish, and microfibrillated cellulose on the dewatering of papermaking furnishes

ANTTI KOPONEN, SANNA HAAVISTO, JOHANNA LIUKKONEN, JUHA SALMELA

TAPPI Journal· Volume 14· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, we present an improved experimental method for studying the initial dewatering process in papermaking. We studied the effects of the dewatering pressure profile, the furnish type, and microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) on the development of flow resistance and the final solids content of the filtered sheet. The major difference from the previous studies is the possibility to control the dewatering pressure profile during filtration. The filtration process is monitored by measuring the pressure drop over the filtrated sheet and the flow rate through the filtered sheet as a function of time. In the end, the final solids content is measured. Our results indicate that the sheet solids content after the initial dewatering depends on the magnitude and the shape of the pressure profile used during the filtration and that this dependency remains after wet pressing. Laboratory scale measurements are repeated in pilot scale using a papermaking research environment, with comparable results. Surprisingly, we found that the addition of MFC increases the solids content. This was verified in laboratory and pilot scale studies. Overall, this study shows that laboratory scale measurements can be useful in determining the optimal dewatering conditions for different furnish types.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Material Properties and Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Pääkkö, M., Ikkala, O., Lindström, T., et al., Biomacromolecules 8(6): 1934(2007).10.1021/bm061215p ↗
2. Räisänen, K., Pap. Puu 78(3): 113(1996).10.1046/j.1464-410X.1996.05122.x ↗
3. Parker, J., The Sheet-Forming Process – A Project of the Fluid Mechanics Committee, TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1972, p. 65.
4. Aslund, P. and Vomhoff, H., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 23(4): 389(2008).10.3183/npprj-2008-23-04-p389-397 ↗
5. Biermann, C., Handbook of Pulping and Paper Making, 2nd ed., Academic Press, London, UK, 1996, p. 218.
6. Kataja, M. and Hirsilä, P., The Science of Papermaking Transactions of the 12th Fundamental Research Symp., PITA, Bury, UK, 2001, p. 591.
7. Erkkila, A., Pakarinen, P., and Odell, M., Pulp Pap. Can. 99(1): 81(1998).
8. Ruusuvirta, L., Salmela, J., Jäsberg, A., et al., “MFC labelling, retention and distribution in paper,” TAPPI Int. Conf. Nanotechnol. Renewable Mater., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 2013.
9. Boss, C. and Fredeen, J., Concepts, instrumentation, and techniques in inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry, Perkin Elmer Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA, 1997, p. 2-1.
10. Aaltosalmi, U., “Fluid flow in porous media with the lattice-Boltzmann method,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland, 2005.
11. Bear, J., Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, Dover, New York, 1972, pp. 161-175.
12. Sayegh, N. and Gonzalez, T., J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 21(7): 255(1995).
13. Koponen, A., Haavisto, S., Liukkonen, J., et al., “The flow resistance of the sheet during consolidation,” in preparation.
14. Hubbe, M. and Heitmann, J., Bioresources 2(3): 500(2007).10.15376/biores.2.1.1-2 ↗
15. Räisänen, K., “Water removal by flat boxes and a couch roll on a paper machine wire section,” Ph.D. thesis (tech.), Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland, 1998.
16. Kajanto, I. and Kosonen, M., TAPPI Int. Conf. Nanotechnol. Renewable Mater., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 2012, p. 393.
17. Syverud, K. and Stenius, P., Cellulose 16(1): 75(2009).10.1007/s10570-008-9244-2 ↗