journal article·2015-07-01Open access

An experimental study of smelt-water interaction in the recovery boiler dissolving tank

ERIC JIN, MARKUS BUSSMANN, HONGHI TRAN

TAPPI Journal· Volume 14· Issue 6

Abstract

A laboratory apparatus was constructed to simulate the operating conditions of recovery boiler smelt dissolving tanks and used to systematically study the interaction between molten smelt droplets and water. Experiments were performed on synthetic smelt made of 80 wt% Na2CO3 and 20 wt% NaCl at 800°C, 900°C, and 1000°C. The results show that upon contact with water, some smelt droplets explode immediately and break into small pieces, some require a delay time to explode, and others solidify without exploding. The probability of explosion strongly depends on water temperature and to some extent, smelt temperature. At a given smelt temperature, there exists a water temperature range below which explosion always occurs (the lower critical water temperature) and above which there is no explosion (the upper critical water temperature). The lower critical water temperature decreases with increasing smelt temperature, while the upper critical water temperature remains the same at 82°C in all cases. Up to this upper critical water temperature, both the explosion delay time and explosion intensity increase with increasing water temperature. The data was used to construct a Smelt-Water Interaction Temperature (SWIT) diagram that can predict if a molten synthetic smelt droplet will explode in water at different smelt and water temperatures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermal and Kinetic Analysis · Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Grace, T.M. and Tran, H.N., “Critical issues in dissolving tank operation,” Int. Chem. Recovery Conf., TAPPI/PAPTAC, TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010.
2. Grace, T.M. in Kraft Recovery Boilers (T.N. Adams, Ed.) TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 1997, Chap. 11.
3. Lien, S. and DeMartini, N. “Dissolving Tank Explosions: A Review of Incidents between 1973 and 2008.” Unpublished report to BLRBAC and AF&PA, American Forest & Paper Association (sponsor), New York, 2008.
4. Shick, P.E. and Grace, T.M., Int. Chem. Recovery Conf., Technical Section of CPPA, Montreal, QC, 1981, p. 155.
5. Sallack, J.A., Pulp Pap. Can. 56(10): 114(1955).10.1086/esj.56.1.998801 ↗
6. Nelson, W. and Kennedy, E.H., Pap. Trade J. 140(29): 50(1956).10.1210/endo-59-1-140 ↗
7. Corradini, M.L., Kim, B.J., and Oh, M.D., Prog. Nucl. Energy 22(1): 1(1988).10.1016/0149-1970(88)90004-2 ↗
8. Epstein, S.G. in Light Metals 1993 (S.K. Das, Ed.), American Instititute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, New York, 1992, pp. 845-853.
9. Katz, D.L., and Sliepcevich, C.M., Hydrocarbon Process. 50(11): 240(1971).
10. Francis, P., and Self, S., Sci. Am. 249(5): 149(1983).10.1038/scientificamerican1183-172 ↗
11. Dullforce, T.A., Buchanan, D.J., and Peckover, R.S., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 9(9): 1295(1976).10.1088/0022-3727/9/9/006 ↗
12. Buchanan, D.J., and Dullforce, T.A., Nature 245(5419): 32(1973).10.1038/245032a0 ↗
13. Reid, R.C., Adv. Chem. Eng. 12: 105(1983).10.1016/S0065-2377(08)60252-5 ↗