Surface Mechanical Treatment of TMP Pulp Fibers Using Grit Material
Source abstract
Abstract
The authors studied surface mechanical treatments of thermomechanical pulp fibers using a grit material after first-stage refining and the treatment’s impact on second-stage refining. The surface mechanical treatment was performed using an ultra-fine friction grinder. The grit size of the grinding stone, the intensity of treatment and the rotational speed were optimized to accomplish rapid development and minimization of pulp fiber shorten-ing. The second stage of refining was carried out using a wing defibrator operated under typical TMP refining conditions. Surface mechanical treatment using a grinding stone with a grit diameter of 297-420 µm, operated at a contact point of the stones and a high rotational speed of 1500 rpm, provided an efficient disruption of pulp fibers with minimized cutting. A promising degree of fiber cell wall fracture was obtained when the energy applied during disruption was approximately 20% of the total refiner energy consumption. During second stage refining the disrupted pulp developed freeness more quickly while requiring 37% less energy. Laboratory sheets showed no significant differences in properties between the disrupted and non-disrupted pulps at a given freeness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Engineering Technology and Methodologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Karnis, A., J. Pulp Pap Sci. 20(10):J280 (1994).
2. Salmén, L. et al., Papermaking science and technology, Book 5, Mechanical pulping, Fapet Oy, Finland, 1999, pp.35-61.
3. Salmén, L. and Fellers, C., International Mechanical Pulping Conference, EUCEPA, Norway, 1981, session 5(1).
4. Marton, R., International symposium on fundamental concepts of refin-ing, IPC, USA, 1980, pp.97-106.
5. Koran, Z., Technical Section 66th annual meeting, CPPA, Canada, 1980, pp. A173-A177.
6. Lamb, G. E. R., Tappi J. 45(5):364 (1962).10.1017/S0373463300020221 ↗
7. Salmén, L. and Hagen, R., Handbook of physical testing of paper, Vol.1, Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, 2002, pp.77-113.
8. Salmén, L., International Mechanical Pulping Conference, SPCI, Sweden, 1997, pp. 207-211.10.1016/S1359-6128(97)82651-1 ↗
9. Uhmeier, A. and Salmén, L., Nord. Pulp Pap Res. J. 11(3):171 (1996).10.3183/npprj-1996-11-03-p171-176 ↗
10. Sundholm, J., International Mechanical Pulping Conference, PTF, Norway, 1993, pp.133-142.
11. Miles, K. B. and May, W. D., J. Pulp Pap Sci. 10(2):J36 (1984).
12. Stationwala, M. I., Tappi J. 70(10):124 (1987).
13. Kano, T., Iwamida, T. and Sumi, Y., 1983 International symposium on wood and pulping chemistry, Japan TAPPI, Japan, vol. 2, pp. 5-10.
14. Pregetter, M., Eichinger, R. and Stark, K., 5th International paper and board industry conference-scientific and technical advance in refining, Pira International, UK, 1999.
15. Somboon, P., Kang, T., and Paulapuro, H., Pulp Pap. Can. 108(10):30 (2007).
16. Montgomery, D. C., Design and analysis of experiments, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1991, p. 290.
17. Somboon, P. and Paulapuro, H., Progress in Paper Physics Seminar, Miami University, Ohio, USA, 2006, p.45.
18. Perez, M. and Kallmes, O., Tappi J. 48(10):601(1965).10.2307/336415 ↗
19. Maloney, T. C. and Paulapuro, H., J. Pulp Pap Sci. 25(12):430 (1999).
20. Fernando, D. and Daniel, G., Nord. Pulp Pap Res. J. 19(3):278 (2004).10.3183/npprj-2004-19-03-p278-285 ↗
21. Stationwala, M.I., Mathieu, J., and Karnis, A., J. Pulp Pap Sci. 22(5): J155 (1996).