Mill study on improving lime kiln efficiency
Source abstract
Abstract
Optimization of the lime kiln requires an examination of the entire lime cycle. To increase the energy efficiency of the lime kiln, all auxiliary unit operations must function properly. It is also imperative that the lime and liquor in the system is of acceptable quality. We detail a kiln energy efficiency study performed by MWV Corp.’s Covington, VA, USA, mill. From a recausticizing standpoint, lime quality is much easier to control than liquor quality because liquor passes through many operations that are not under the lime kiln operator’s control. Recausticizing is a fairly closed cyclical process where lime is concerned, so saturation of impurities to the point of operational issues must be considered. Specific cycle performance indicators (e.g., lime mud solids entering the kiln) must be viewed from a perspective that does not exclude their potential impact. To get a true picture of the cost of operating the lime cycle, all inputs must be considered. The four main inputs are power (electrical and fuel), fresh lime, caustic, and water.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron and Steelmaking Processes · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Taylor, K., “Effect of non-process elements on kraft mill efficiency,” Prepr. – PAPTAC Annu. Meet., 93rd, Pulp and Paper Technical Association of Canada (PAPTAC), Montreal, 2007, p. 1.
2. McGuffie, B. and Taylor, K., Pulp Pap. Can. 108(3): T49(2007).
3. Lundqvist, P., “Mass and energy balances over the lime kiln in a kraft pulp mill,” Master’s thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 2009.
4. Fan, X., “The fates of vanadium and sulfur introduced with petcoke to lime kilns,” Master’s thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, 2010.
5. Ellis, M. and Johnson, T., Appita J. 64(3): 235(2011).
6. Richards, T., Pavletic, C., and Pettersson, J., Int. J. Energy Res. 33(15): 1341(2009).10.1002/er.1546 ↗
7. Porter, J., Thung, T., and Sands, T., “Understanding and controlling the kraft liquor cycle using FT-NIR analysis,” presentation, 2010 Eastern Canadian BLRBAC and PAPTAC Steam and Power Committee, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 22 June 2010. Available [Online] http://www.paptac.ca/ssp-members/Jack%20Porter%20-%20Kraft%20Liquor%20Cycle%20FT-NIR.pdf <06February2015>.
8. Harris, J.F., “The role of total process concepts in evaluating pulping research,” TAPPI Non-Sulfur Pulping Symp., [Prepr.], TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1974, p. 161.
9. Tran, H. and Vakkilainen, E.K., “Advances in the kraft chemical recovery process,” 3rd Int. Colloq. Eucalyptus Pulp, UniverdidadeFederal de Viçosa, Viçosa , Brazil, 2007.
10. Keitaanniemi, O. and Vickola, N., Tappi 65(7): 89(1982).
11. Tran, H., Griffithse, J., and Budge, M., Pulp Pap. Can. 92(1): 78(1991).
12. Tran, H. and Barham, B., Tappi J. 74(1): 131(1991).