journal article·2017

An easy and reliable method for syringyl: guaiacyl ratio measurement

Raquel Prado, Lisa Weigand, Shikh M.S.N.S. Zahari, Xabier Erdocia, Jason Hallett, Jall Labidi, Tom Welton

TAPPI Journal· Volume 16· Issue 03
Publisher page

Abstract

Lignin structure elucidation is one of the main targets for biorefinery related research. Because of its complexity, obtaining reproducible results in a straight-forward way is very important. One of the values that is used to compare different lignins is the syringyl:guaiacyl (S/G) ratio, which has been measured in different ways. The most reliable result is obtained for nitrobenzene oxidation, but this involves a complex process. In this work, the S/G ratios measured by pyrolysis-gas chromatography mass spectrometry (py-GCMS) and heteronuclear single quantum coherence-nuclear magnetic resonance (HSQC-NMR) spectroscopy were compared with attenuated total reflection infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopy results to establish a reliable, quick, and simple method for the measurement. To achieve this, two mathematical models were applied with multivariate data analysis software. A partial least squares regression model for py-GCMS gave the best result.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Fermentation and Sensory Analysis · Biochemical and biochemical processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Toledano, A., Serrano, L., and Labidi., J., J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 44(4): 552(2013).10.1016/j.jtice.2013.01.009 ↗
2. Vanholme, R., Demedts, B., Morreel, K., et al., Plant Physiol. 153(3): 895(2010).10.1104/pp.110.155119 ↗
3. Kumar, P., Barret, D.M., Delwiche, M.J., et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48(8): 3713(2009).10.1021/ie801542g ↗
4. Erdocia, X., Prado, R., Corcuera, M.A., et al., J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 20(3): 1103(2014)10.1016/j.jiec.2013.06.048 ↗
5. Prado, R., Erdocia, X., and Labidi, J., J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 88(7): 1248(2013).10.1002/jctb.3965 ↗
6. Lanzalunga, O. and Bietti. M., J. Photochem. Photobiol., B 56(2-3): 85(2000).10.1016/S1011-1344(00)00054-3 ↗
7. Ona, T., Sonoda, T., Itoh, K., et al., Holzforschung 51(5): 396(1997).10.1515/hfsg.1997.51.5.396 ↗
8. Reeves, J.B., J. Dairy Sci. 69(1): 71(1986).10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80371-X ↗
9. Sun, R., Lawther, J.M., and Banks, W.B., Ind. Crops Prod. 4(4): 241(1995).10.1016/0926-6690(95)00038-0 ↗
10. Martínez, A.T., Almendros, G., González-Vila, F.J., et al., Solid State NMR 15(1): 41(1999).10.1016/S0926-2040(99)00045-4 ↗
11. Sette, M., Wechselberger, R., and Crestini. C., Chem. – Eur. J. 17(34): 9529(2011).10.1002/chem.201003045 ↗
12. Nunes, C.A., Lima, C.F., Barbosa, L.C.A., et al., Bioresour. Technol. 101(11): 4056(2010).10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.012 ↗
13. Otto, M., Chemometrics: Statistics and Computer Application in Analytical Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2007.
14. Wold, S., Sjöström, M., and Eriksson. L., Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 58(2): 109(2001).10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00155-1 ↗
15. Mevik, B.H. and Wehrens, R., J. Stat. Software. 18(2): 1(2007).10.18637/jss.v018.i02 ↗
16. Depczynski, U., Frost, V.J., and Molt. K., Anal. Chim. Acta 420(2): 217(2000).10.1016/S0003-2670(00)00893-X ↗
17. Skoog, D.A., Hooler, F.J., and Nieman, T.A., Principles of Instrumental Analysis, McGraw-Hill, Madrid, Spain, 2001.
18. Yuan, T.Q., Sun, S.N., and Xu, F., et al., J. Agric. Food. Chem. 59(19): 10604(2011).10.1021/jf2031549 ↗
19. Wen, J.L., Sun, S.L., Xue, B.L., et al., Materials 6(1): 356(2013).10.3390/ma6010359 ↗