Nanocellulose–cationic starch– colloidal silica systems for papermaking: Effects on process and paper properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Laboratory tests were conducted to better understand effects on the papermaking process and handsheets when recycled copy paper furnish was treated with combinations of nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC), cat-ionic starch, colloidal silica, and cationic retention aid (cPAM; cationic polyacrylamide). Dosage-response experiments helped to define conditions leading to favorable processing outcomes, including dewatering rates and the efficiency of fine-particle retention during papermaking. Effects were found to depend on the addition amounts of cationic starch and colloidal silica added to the system. It was shown that the presence of a polymer additive such as cationic starch was essential in order to achieve large strength gains with simultaneous usage of NFC.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Lignin and Wood Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Page, D.H., Tappi 52(4): 674(1969).
2. Gharehkhani, S., Sadeghinezhad, E., Kazi, S.N., et al., Carbohydr. Polym. 115: 785(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.047.10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.047 ↗
3. Hubbe, M.A., Sjöstrand, B., Nilsson, L., et al., BioResources 15(4): 9672(2020). https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.4.Hubbe.10.15376/biores.15.4.hubbe ↗
4. Weise, U., “Changes in wood pulp fibers caused by water remov-al,” in COST Action E1 Paper Recyclability: Improvement of Recyclability and the Recycling Paper Industry of the Future (A. Blanco, C. Negro, I. Gaspar, et al., Eds.), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1998.
5. Lavoine, N., Desloges, I., Dufresne, A., et al., Carbohydr. Polym. 90: 735(2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026.10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026 ↗
6. Yi, T., Zhao, H.Y., Mo, Q., et al., Materials 13(22): 5062(2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13225062.10.3390/ma13225062 ↗
7. Salas, C., Hubbe, M., and Rojas, O.J., “Nanocellulose applications in papermaking,” in Production of Materials from Sustainable Biomass Resources (Z. Fang, R.L. Smith, Jr., and X.-F. Tian, Eds.), Biofuels and Biorefineries Series 9, Springer, New York, 2019, Chap. 3, pp. 61-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3768-0_3.10.1007/978-981-13-3768-0_3 ↗
8. Ding, Q.J., Zeng, J.S., Wang, B., et al., Carbohydr. Polym. 186: 73(2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.040.10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.040 ↗
9. Wang, S.D., Gao, W.H., Chen, K.F., et al., TAPPI J. 17(3): 157(2018). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ17.03.157.10.32964/TJ17.03.157 ↗
10. Petroudy, S.R.D., Syverud, K., Chinga-Carrasco, G., et al., Carbohydr. Polym. 99: 311(2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.07.073.10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.07.073 ↗
11. Merayo, N., Balea, A., de la Fuente, E., et al., Cellulose 24(7): 2987(2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1302-1.10.1007/s10570-017-1302-1 ↗
12. Campano, C., Merayo, N., Balea, A., et al., Cellulose 25(1):269(2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1552-y.10.1007/s10570-017-1552-y ↗
13. Manninen, M., Kajanto, I., Happonen, J., et al., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 26(3): 297(2011). https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2011-26-03-p297-305.10.3183/npprj-2011-26-03-p297-305 ↗
14. Rice, M.C., Pal, L., Gonzalez, R., et al., TAPPI J. 17(7): 395(2018). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ17.07.395.10.32964/TJ17.07.395 ↗
15. Britt, K.W., Tappi 56(3): 83(1973).10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(73)85230-0 ↗
16. Britt, K.W., and Unbehend, J.E., Tappi 59(2): 67(1976).
17. Milliken, J.O., “Spectrophotometric determination of fines reten-tion using the dynamic retention/drainage jar,” Seattle Retention and Drainage Short Course, 1977, p. 55.
18. Ricci, R.W., Ditzler, M.A., and Nestor, L.P., J. Chem. Educ. 71(11): 983(1994). https://doi.org/10.1021/ed071p983.10.1021/ed071p983 ↗
19. Pöykiö, R. and Nurmesniemi, H., Environ. Chem. Lett. 6(1): 47(2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-007-0110-5.10.1007/s10311-007-0110-5 ↗
20. Strazdins, E., Tappi 60(7): 113(1977).10.1016/S1474-6670(17)66232-3 ↗
21. Britt, K.W., Unbehend, J.E., and Shridharan, R., Tappi J. 69(7): 76(1986).
22. Kumar, P., Wei, H.L., Ramarao, B.V., et al., Chem. Eng. Commun. 152-153: 287(1996). https://doi.org/10.1080/00986449608936569.10.1080/00986449608936569 ↗
23. Hubbe, M.A. and Heitmann, J.A., BioResources 2(3): 500(2007). https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.2.1.1-2.10.15376/biores.2.1.1-2 ↗
24. La Mer, V.K. and Healy, T.W., Rev. Pure Appl. Chem. 13:112(1963).
25. Andersson, K. and Lindgren, E., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 11(1):15(1996). https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-1996-11-01-p015-021.10.3183/npprj-1996-11-01-p015-021 ↗
26. Hubbe, M.A., "Microparticle programs for drainage and retention," in Micro and Nanoparticles in Papermaking (J.M. Rodriguez, Ed.), TAPPI Press, Atlanta, 2005, Chap. 1, pp. 1-36.
27. Leib, B., Garland, L.J., Barrios, N.A., and Hubbe, M.A., TAPPI J. 21(9): 572(2022).10.32964/TJ21.10.572 ↗