Effects of orders of addition in nanocellulose–cationic starch– colloidal silica systems for papermaking
Source abstract
Abstract
Two orders of addition were compared when preparing paper handsheets from recycled copy paper furnish in combination with nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC), cationic starch, colloidal silica, and cationic retention aid (cPAM; cationic polyacrylamide). Faster dewatering and higher fine-particle retention were obtained at equal optimized dosages of additives when the colloidal silica was added last, after addition of the cPAM. The same order of addition also provided a higher gain in the paper’s tensile strength. However, higher paper stiffness was achieved when the colloidal silica was instead added to the NFC, after its pretreatment with cationic starch. Results were consistent with the principle that papermaking additives added shortly before sheetforming tend to have the largest effects on drainage and retention. The results also demonstrated a sensitivity to the relative dosages of positively and negatively charged additives.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Material Properties and Processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Rice, M.C., Pal, L., Gonzalez, R., et al., TAPPI J. 17(7): 395(2018). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ17.07.395.10.32964/TJ17.07.395 ↗
2. Garland, L.J., Leib, B.D., Barrios, N.A., et al., TAPPI J. 21(10): 563(2022).10.32964/TJ21.10.563 ↗
3. Mueller, P., Gruber, E., and Schempp, W., Wochenbl. Papierfabr. 127(7): 460(1999).
4. Andersson, K. and Sandström, A., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 1(2): 26(1986). https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-1986-01-02-p026-030.10.3183/npprj-1986-01-02-p026-030 ↗
5. Langley, J.G. and Litchfield, E., Papermakers Conf., TAPPI Press, Atlanta, 1986, p. 89.
6. Langley, J. and Holroyd, D., U.S. pat. 4,753,710 (Jun. 28,1988).10.1093/geront/28.5.710 ↗
7. Asselman, T. and Garnier, G., J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 27(8): 273(2001).
8. Hubbe, M.A. and Wang, F., TAPPI J. 1(1): 28(2002).
9. Asselman, T. and Garnier, G., Colloids Surf., A 170(2/3): 79(2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(00)00487-8.10.1016/S0927-7757(00)00487-8 ↗
10. McKenzie, A.W., Appita 12(4): 104(1968).10.3758/BF03331218 ↗
11. Hubbe, M.A., Colloids Surf. 16: 249(1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-6622(85)80257-2.10.1016/0166-6622(85)80257-2 ↗
12. Hubbe, M.A., “Microparticle programs for drainage and retention,” in Micro and Nanoparticles in Papermaking (J.M. Rodriguez, Ed.), TAPPI Press, Atlanta, 2005, Chap. 1, pp. 1-36.
13. Hubbe, M.A., Lignocellulose 3(1): 69(2014).
14. Andersson, K. and Lindgren, E., Nordic Pulp Pap. Res. J. 11(1):15(1996). https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-1996-11-01-p015-021.10.3183/npprj-1996-11-01-p015-021 ↗
15. Peng, Y.-C., Gardner, D.J., and Han, Y.-S., Cellulose 19: 91(2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9630-z.10.1007/s10570-011-9630-z ↗
16. Page, D., J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 19(4): J175(1993).
17. Pönni, R., Vuorinen, T., and Kontturi, E., BioResources 7(4): 6077(2012). https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.7.4.6077-6108.10.15376/biores.7.4.6077-6108 ↗
18. Isogai, A., Saito, T., and Fukuzumi, H., Nanoscale 3(1): 71(2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C0NR00583E.10.1039/C0NR00583E ↗
19. Carlson, U., “Some aspects of microparticle flocculation,” EUCEPA 24: Pap. Technol.: The World Pulp Pap. Week, EUCEPA, Paris, 1990.
20. Lenze, C.J., Peksa, C.A., Sun, W.M., et al., Cellulose 23(6):3951(2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1077-9.10.1007/s10570-016-1077-9 ↗
21. Heermann, M.L., Welter, S.R., and Hubbe, M.A., TAPPI J. 5(6):9(2006).
22. Britt, K.W., Tappi 56(3): 83(1973).10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(73)85230-0 ↗
23. Britt, K.W. and Unbehend, J.E., Tappi 59(2): 67(1976).
24. Milliken, J.O., “Spectrophotometric fetermination of fines retention using the dynamic retention/drainage jar,” Seattle Retention and Drainage Short Course, 1977, p. 55.
25. Roberts, J.C., Au, C.O., and Lough, C., Tappi J. 69(10): 88(1986).