Papermaking properties of bacterial nanocellulose produced from mother of vinegar, a waste product after classical vinegar production
Source abstract
Abstract
Bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) has gained a lot of attention in recent years due to its nano-size-derived properties. Although it is essentially chemically similar to plant-derived cellulose, it has smaller size and is enriched in free hydroxyl groups, which greatly improve mechanical properties of reinforced paper. However, although BNC has some unique features, it comes at a high price. In this paper, we introduce a new solution for BNC production. We have isolated bacterial nanocellulose directly from agro-industrial waste—mother of vinegar—and used it in the production of paper sheets. We show here that paper sheets made with the addition of only 10% bacte-rial nanocellulose from mother of vinegar substantially improved basic mechanical as well as printing properties of paper.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Digital Image Processing Techniques · Material Properties and Processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Ross, P., Mayer, R., Benziman, M., Microbiol. Rev. 55: 35(1991). https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.55.1.35-58.1991.10.1128/mr.55.1.35-58.1991 ↗
2. Shoda, M. and Sugano, Y., Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 10: 1(2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931175.10.1007/bf02931175 ↗
3. Jung, J.Y., Khan, T., Park, J.K., et al., Korean J. Chem. Eng. 24: 265(2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-007-5058-4.10.1007/s11814-007-5058-4 ↗
4. Yamada, Y., Yukphan, P., Lan Vu, H.T., et al., J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 58: 397(2012). https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.58.397.10.2323/jgam.58.397 ↗
5. Lee. K-Y., Buldum, G., Mantalaris, A., et al., Macromol. Biosci. 14: 10(2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201300298.10.1002/mabi.201470001 ↗
6. Chao, Y., Ishida, T., Sugano, Y., et al., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 68:345(2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(20000505)68:3<345::AID-BIT13>3.0.CO;2-M.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(20000505)68:3<345::AID-BIT13>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
7. Chawla, P.R., Bajaj, I.B., Survase, S.A., et al., Food Technol. Biotechnol. 47: 107(2009).
8. Cheng, H-P., Wang, P-M., Chen, J-W., et al., Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 35: 125(2002). https://doi.org/10.1042/BA20010066.10.1042/BA20010066 ↗
9. Song, H-J., Li, H., Seo, J-H., et al., Korean J. Chem. Eng. 26:141(2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-009-0022-0.10.1007/s11814-009-0022-0 ↗
10. Kralisch, D., Hessler, N., Klemm, D., et al., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 105: 740(2010).10.1002/bit.22579 ↗
11. Rajwade, J.M., Paknikar, K.M., and Kumbhar, J.V., Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99: 2491(2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6426-3.10.1007/s00253-015-6426-3 ↗
12. Masaoka, S., Ohe, T., and Sakota, N., J. Ferment. Bioeng. 75: 18(1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0922-338X(93)90171-4.10.1016/0922-338X(93)90171-4 ↗
13. Matsuoka, M., Tsuchida, T., Matsushita, K., et al., Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem. 60: 575(1996). https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.60.575.10.1271/bbb.60.575 ↗
14. Yang, Y.K., Park, S.H., Hwang, J.W., J. Ferment. Bioeng. 85:312(1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0922-338X(97)85681-4.10.1016/S0922-338X(97)85681-4 ↗
15. Ishihara, M., Matsunaga, M., Hayashi, N., et al., Enzyme Microb. Technol. 31: 986(2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00215-6.10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00215-6 ↗
16. Son, H-J., Kim, H-G., Kim, K-K., et al., Bioresour. Technol. 86: 215(2003).10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00176-1 ↗
17. Keshk, S.M.A.S. and Sameshima, K., Afr. J. Biotechnol. 4:478(2005).
18. Zhou, L.L., Sun, D.P., and Hu, L.Y., J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 34: 483(2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-007-0218-4.10.1007/s10295-007-0218-4 ↗
19. Mikkelsen, D., Flanagan, B.M., Dykes, G.A., et al., J. Appl. Microbiol. 107: 576(2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04226.x.10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04226.x ↗
20. Yoshinaga, F., Tonouchi, N., and Watanabe, K., Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem. 61: 219(1997). https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.61.219.10.1271/bbb.61.219 ↗
21. Jonas, R. and Farah, L.F., Polym. Degrad. Stab. 59: 101(1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00197-3.10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00197-3 ↗
22. Schrecker, S.T. and Gostomski, P.A., Biotechnol. Lett. 27: 1435(2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-005-1465-y.10.1007/s10529-005-1465-y ↗
23. El-Saied, H., El-Diwany, A.I., Basta, A.H., et al., BioResources 3: 1196(2008).10.15376/biores.3.4.1196-1217 ↗
24. Fang, L. and Catchmark, J.M., Cellulose 21: 3965(20014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0443-8.10.1007/s10570-014-0443-8 ↗
25. Jeon, S., Yoo, Y-M., Park, J-W., et al., Curr. Appl. Phys. 14:1621(2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2014.07.010.10.1016/j.cap.2014.07.010 ↗
26. Rosa, J.R., da Silva, I.S.V., de Lima, C.S.M., et al., Cellulose 21: 1361(2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0169-7.10.1007/s10570-014-0169-7 ↗
27. Skoˇcaj, M., Cellulose 26: 6477(2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02566-y.10.1007/s10570-019-02566-y ↗
28. Lu, Y., Tekinlap, H., Eberle, C.C., et al., TAPPI J. 13(6): 47(2014). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ13.6.47.10.32964/TJ13.6.47 ↗
29. Lindstrom, T., TAPPI J. 18(5): 308(2019). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ18.5.308.10.32964/TJ18.5.308 ↗
30. Xiang, Z., Jin, X., Liu, Q., et al., Cellulose 24: 5147(2017a). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1468-6.10.1007/s10570-017-1468-6 ↗
31. Blanco, A., Miranda, R., and Monte, M.C., For. Syst. 22: 471(2013). https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2013223-03677.10.5424/fs/2013223-03677 ↗
32. Kose, R., Yamaguchi, K., and Okayama, T., Cellulose 23: 1393(2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0874-5.10.1007/s10570-016-0874-5 ↗
33. Laftah, W.A. and Rahman, W.A.W.A., J. Nat. Fibers 13: 85(2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2014.984060.10.1080/15440478.2014.984060 ↗
34. Campano, C., Merayom, N., Balea, A., et al., Cellulose 25:269(2018a). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1552-y.10.1007/s10570-017-1552-y ↗
35. Goncalves, M. and Łaszkiewicz, B., Prz. Pap. R. 55: 657(1999).
36. Iguchi, M., Yamanaka, S., Budhiono, A., J. Mater. Sci. 35: 261(2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004775229149.10.1023/A:1004775229149 ↗
37. Serafica, G., Mormino, R., and Bungay, H., Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 58: 756(2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-002-0978-8.10.1007/s00253-002-0978-8 ↗
38. Mormino, R. and Bungay, H., Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 62: 503(2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1377-5.10.1007/s00253-003-1377-5 ↗
39. Presler, S. and Surma-S’lusarska, B., Przem. Chem. T85(8-9): 1297(2006).
40. Basta, A.H. and El-Saied, H., J. Appl. Microbiol. 107: 2098(2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04467.x.10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04467.x ↗
41. Ashjaran, A., Yazdanshenas, M.E., Rashidi, A., et al, J. Text. Inst. 104: 121(2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2012.703796.10.1080/00405000.2012.703796 ↗
42. Fillat, A., Martínez, J., Valls, C., et al., Cellulose 25: 6093(2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1967-0.10.1007/s10570-018-1967-0 ↗
43. Gao, W-H., Chen, K-F., Yang, R-D., et al., BioResources 6:144(2011).10.15376/biores.6.1.144-153 ↗
44. Santos, S.M., Carbajo, J.M., and Go’mez, N., et al., J. Mater. Sci. 52: 5882(2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0824-0.10.1007/s10853-017-0824-0 ↗
45. Xiang, Z., Liu, Q., Chen, Y., et al., Cellulose 24: 3513(2017b). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1361-3.10.1007/s10570-017-1361-3 ↗
46. Santos, S.M., Carbajo, J.M., Quintana, E., et al., Carbohydr. Polym. 116: 173(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.064.10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.064 ↗