journal article·2016-07-01

Toward cellulose nanomaterial commercialization: Knowledge gap analysis for Safety Data Sheets according to the Globally Harmonized System

JO ANNE SHATKIN, KIMBERLY ONG, JAMES EDE, THEODORE WEGNER, MICHAEL GOERGEN

TAPPI Journal· Volume 15· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Commercialization of cellulose nanomaterials (CNs) is rapidly advancing, to the benefit of many end-use product sectors, and providing information about the safe manufacturing and handling for CNs is a priority. Safety Data Sheets (SDS) are required for industrially produced materials to communicate information on their potential health, fire, reactivity, and environmental hazards, and to provide recommendations on how to safely work with these materials. Cellulose and cellulose pulp, which have widespread commercial end uses, can create nuisance dusts when dried and are required to have SDS. We therefore expect that nanoscale forms of cellulose will also require SDS. This study identifies the currently available SDS information for CNs and highlights existing gaps in our knowledge. With U.S. and international adoption of the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for Hazard Communication, producers are required to report SDS known data and data gaps. Given the novelty of all nanomaterials, it is preferable to fill these gaps in SDS as a demonstration of our commitment to the safe production and use of these materials. To evaluate the availability of SDS information and prepare for commercialization of CNs, we assessed available safety information for CNs to identify available GHS SDS data, data gaps, and what data need to yet be developed to fully classify CNs according to the GHS. Specifically, we report on the available data and gaps regarding the toxicological profile, environmental characteristics, physical and chemical properties, exposure controls, and personal protection for cellulose nanomaterials, to encourage the development of missing data and advance safe commercialization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Shatkin, J.A., Wegner, T.H., Bilek, E.M., et al., TAPPI J. 13(5):9(2014).10.32964/TJ13.5.9 ↗
2. European Chemicals Agency, “Guidance on the preparation of dossiers for harmonized classification and labeling,” European Chemicals Agency, Helsinki, Finland, 2014. Available [Online] http://www.echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13562/clh_guidance_draft_caracal_en.pdf <8June2016>.10.4337/9781784711313.00012 ↗
3. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, “Hazard Communication Standard,” U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2012. Available [Online] https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/index.html <8June2016>.
4. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, “Ecotoxicology and environmental fate of manufactured nanomaterials: test guidelines,” Environment Directorate, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France, 2014. Available [Online] http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ENV/JM/MONO(2014)1&doclanguage=en <8June2016>.10.1787/9789264225756-6-en ↗
5. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, “Guidance on sample preparation and dosimetry for the safety testing of manufactured nanomaterials,” Environment Directorate, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2012. Available [Online] http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/ mono(2012)40&doclanguage=en <8June2016>.10.1007/springerreference_75881 ↗
6. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, “Inhalation toxicity testing: Expert meeting on potential revisions to OECD test guidelines and guidance document,” Environment Directorate, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2012. Available [Online] http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2012)14&doclanguage=en <8June2016>.10.1007/springerreference_75881 ↗
7. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, “Preliminary review of OECD test guidelines for their applicability to manufactured nanomaterials,” Environment Directorate, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2009. Available [Online] http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2009)21&doclanguage=en <8June2016>.10.4324/9780203875773 ↗
8. Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/ World Health Organization Expert Committee on Food Additives, “Safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants: WHO Food Additive Series 40,” World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1998. Available [Online] http://www.inchem.org/documents/jecfa/jecmono/v040je03.htm <8June2016>.10.1007/s13197-010-0079-0 ↗
9. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, “The Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS) — cellulose,” U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2004. Available [Online] http://www.cdc.gov/niosh-rtecs/FJ56D844.html <8June2016>.10.1037/e371562004-001 ↗
10. Muhle, H., Ernst, H., and Bellmann, B., Ann. Occup. Hyg. 41 (Suppl. 1): 184(1997).
11. Joint Food and Agriculture Organizationof the United Nations/World Health Organization Expert Committee on Food Additives, “Safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants,” World Health Organization, Geneva, 2011. Available [Online] http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstram/10665/44521/1/9789241660648_eng.pdf <8June2016>.10.1002/food.19910350420 ↗
12. Norppa, H., “Nanofibrillated cellulose: results of in vitro and in vivo toxicological assays,” SUNPAP (Scaling Up Nanoparticles in Modern Paper Making), VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland, 2012. Available [Online] http://sunpap.vtt.fi/pdf/final_conference/13_SUNPAP_Norppa_2012.pdf <8June2016>.10.18057/ijasc.2007.3.3.1 ↗
13. Aimonen, A., Lindberg, H.K., Vilske, S., et al., “Genotoxicity of nanofibrillar cellulose,” Int. Congr. Safety Engineered Nanoparticles Nanotechnologies, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, 2015, poster 67.
14. Endes, C., Schmid, O., Kinnear, C., et al., Part. Fibre Toxicol. 11(1): 40(2014).10.1186/s12989-014-0040-x ↗
15. Clift, M.D., Foster, E.J., Vanhecke, D., et al., Biomacromolecules 12(10): 3666(2011).10.1021/bm200865j ↗
16. O’Connor, B., Berry, R., and Goguen, R., Nanotechnology Environmental Health and Safety, Elsevier Inc., Oxford, UK, 2014, Chap. 10.
17. Yanamala, N., Farcas, M.T., Hatfield, M.K., et al., ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2(7): 1691(2014).10.1021/sc500153k ↗
18. Vilske, S., “Inflammatory effects of nanofibrillar cellulose,” Int. Congr. Safety Engineered Nanoparticles Nanotechnologies, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, 2015, poster 70. Available [Online] http://www.ttl.fi/partner/senn2015/programme/Documents/SENN2015%20Programme%20and%20abstracts.pdf <8June2016>.
19. United Nations, Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS), 5th edn., United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2013. Available [Online] http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev05/English/ST-SG-AC10-30-Rev5e.pdf <8June2016>.10.18356/e18d11a0-en ↗
20. Zoppe, J.O., Ruottinen, V., Ruotsalainen, J., et al., Biomacromolecules 15(4): 1534(2014).10.1021/bm500229d ↗
21. Kraus, T., Pfahlberg, A., Zöbelein, P., et al., Chest 125(2): 731(2004).10.1378/chest.125.2.731 ↗
22. Pitkänen, M., Kangas, H., Laitinen, O., et al., Cellulose 21(6): 3871(2014).10.1007/s10570-014-0397-x ↗
23. Kangas, H., “Cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) and CNF-based products,” Int. Conf. Nanotechnol. Renewable Mater., TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2015.
24. Lindberg, H.K., Aimonen, K., Vilske, S., et al., “Genotoxic and immunotoxic effects of nanofibrillar cellulose in vitro,” Int. Nanotoxicology Conf., 7th, Turkish Society of Toxicology, Antalya, Turkey, 2014.
25. de Lima, R., Feitosa, O.L., Maruyama, R., et al., Int. J. Nanomed. 7: 3555(2012).10.2147/IJN.S30596 ↗
26. Catalán, J., Ilves, M., Järventaus, H., et al., Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 56(2): 171(2015).10.1002/em.21913 ↗
27. Anderson, R.L., Owens, J.W., and Timms, C.W., Cancer Lett. 63(2):83(1992).10.1016/0304-3835(92)90057-3 ↗
28. Nigro, N.D., Bull, A.W., Klopfer, B.A., et al., J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 62(4): 1097(1979).
29. Freeman, H.J., Spiller, G.A., and Kim, Y.S., Cancer Res. 38(9): 2912(1978).
30. Kritchevsky, D., Weber, M.M., and Klurfeld, D.M., Cancer Res. 44(8): 3174(1984).
31. Anderson, R.L., Cancer Lett. 48(1): 1(1989).10.1016/0304-3835(89)90196-1 ↗
32. Mohiti-Asli, M., Shivazad, M., Zaghari, M., et al., Poult. Sci. 91(12):3097(2012).10.3382/ps.2012-02282 ↗
33. Harper, B.J, Clendaniel, A., Sinche, F., et al. Cellulose 23(3):1763(2016).10.1007/s10570-016-0947-5 ↗
34. Kovacs, T., Naish, V., O’Connor, B., et al., Nanotoxicology 4(3):255(2010).10.3109/17435391003628713 ↗
35. Vartiainen, J., Pöhler, T., Sirola, K., et al., Cellulose 18(3): 775(2011).10.1007/s10570-011-9501-7 ↗
36. Vikman, M., Vartiainen, J., Tsitko, I., et al., J. Polym. Environ. 23(2):206(2014).10.1007/s10924-014-0694-3 ↗
37. Kümmerer, K., Menz, J., Schubert, T., et al., Chemosphere 82(10):1387(2011).10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.069 ↗
38. Garner, K.L. and Keller, A.A., J. Nanopart. Res. 16(8): 2503(2014).10.1007/s11051-014-2503-2 ↗
39. Jensen, K.A., Crutzen, H., and Kijzeul, A., “NANoREG Guidance Document on Minimum Requirements,” NANoREG, 2014. Available [Online] http://www.prppg.ufpr.br:8080/worknano/sites/default/files/Documentos/20140505%20NANoREG%20Technical%20Guidance%20document%20for%20characterization%20in%20toxicological%20testing%20V1.0.pdf <8June2016>.
40. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, “Report of the OECD Expert Meeting on Physical Chemical Properties,” Environment Directorate, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2014. Available [Online] http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2014)15&doclanguage=en <8June2016>.10.1787/9789264225756-6-en ↗
41. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/TR 13014:2012 Nanotechnologies — Guidance on physico-chemical characterization of engineered nanoscale materials for toxicologic assessment, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2012.10.3403/30197607 ↗
42. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/TR 13329:2012 Nanomaterials — Preparation of Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2012.
43. Sacui, I.A., Nieuwendaal, R.C., Burnett, D.J., et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(9): 6127(2014).10.1021/am500359f ↗
44. Fox, D.M., Lee, J., Citro, C.J., et al., Polymer Degrad. and Stab. (98)2:590(2013).10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.11.016 ↗
45. Raemy, A. and Loeliger, J., Thermochim. Acta 85: 347(1985).10.1016/0040-6031(85)85597-0 ↗
46. National Fire Protection Association, NFPA 68: Standard on explosion protection by deflagration venting, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USA, 2013. Available [Online] http://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/document-informationpages?mode=code&code=68 <8June2016>.10.4135/9781452275956.n220 ↗
47. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, “Hazard communication guidance for combustible dusts,” U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2009. Available [Online] https://www.osha.gov/Publications/3371combustible-dust.html <8June2016>.
48. Wu, H.C., Chang, R.C., and Hsiao, H.C., J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. (22)1: 21(2009).10.1016/j.jlp.2008.10.002 ↗
49. European Commission, “Guidance on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the potential risks related to nanomaterials at work,” European Commission, Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion, Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
50. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, “Approaches to safe nanotechnology: managing the health and safety concerns associated with engineered nanomaterials,” DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2009-125, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2009. Available [Online] http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2009-125/pdfs/2009-125.pdf <8June2016>.10.26616/nioshpub2009125 ↗
51. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, “Current Intelligence Bulletin 63: Occupational exposure to titanium dioxide,” U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2011. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2011-160/pdfs/2011-160.pdf <8June2016>.10.26616/nioshpub2011160 ↗
52. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, “Current Intelligence Bulletin 65: Occupational exposure to carbon nanotubes and nanofibers,” U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2013. Available [Online] http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2013-145/pdfs/2013-145.pdf <8June2016>.10.1037/e371562004-001 ↗
53. British Standards Institute, “Part 2: Guide to safe handling and disposal of manufactured nanomaterials,” British Standards Institute, London, England, 2007. Available [Online] http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/pls/portallive/docs/1/34683696.pdf <8June2014>.
54. Stockmann-Juvala, H., Piia Taxell, P., and Santonen, T., “Formulating occupational exposure limits values (OELs) (inhalation & dermal),” SCAFFOLD SPD7, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, 2014. Available [Online] http://scaffold.eu-vri.eu/filehandler.ashx?file=13717 <8June2016>.10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.03.641 ↗
55. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, “Draft document on titanium dioxide posted by NIOSH for public comment,” NIOSH Update [press release], 23 November 2005. Available [Online] http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/updates/upd-11-23-05.html <8June2016>.10.1037/e371562004-001 ↗
56. Golanski, L., Guillot, A., and Tardif, F., “Are conventional protective devices such as fibrous filter media, cartridge for respirators, protective clothing and gloves also efficient for nanoaerosols,” 2008, Nanosafe, CEA, Grenoble, France. Available [Online] http://www.nanosafe.org/home/liblocal/docs/Dissemination%20report/DR1_s.pdf <8June2016>.
57. Vinches, L., Dolez, P., and Wilkinson, K.J., et al., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 429(1): (2013).10.1088/1742-6596/429/1/012056 ↗
58. Martinez, K.F. in Production and Applications of Cellulose Nanomaterials, TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, 2013, Chap 1.2.
59. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), “General Duty Clause”, 29 U.S.C. § 654, 5(a)1 (1970), U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC. Available [Online] https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title29/pdf/USCODE-2011-title29-chap15 sec654.pdf <8June2016>.
60. European Union Occupational Safety and Health (OSH), “The European Framework Directive on Safety and Health at Work”, Directive 89/391/EEC (1989), Brussels. Available [Online] http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:01989L0391-20081211 <8June2016>.