An Assessment of Gasification-Based Biorefining at Kraft Pulp and Paper Mills in the United States, Part B: Results
Source abstract
Abstract
Commercialization of black liquor and biomass gasification technologies is anticipated in the 2010–2015 timeframe, and synthesis gas from gasifiers can be converted into liquid fuels using catalytic synthesis technol-ogies that are already commercially established today in the gas-to-liquids or coal-to-liquids industries. This set of two papers describes key results from a major assessment of the prospective energy, environmental, and financial performance of commercial gasification-based biorefineries integrated with kraft pulp and paper mills. Seven detailed biorefinery designs were developed for a reference mill in the southeastern United States, together with the associated mass/energy balances, air emissions estimates, and capital investment requirements. The biorefineries provide chemical recovery services and co-produce process steam for the mill, some electricity, and one of three liq-uid fuels: a Fischer-Tropsch synthetic crude oil (which could be refined to vehicle fuels at an existing petroleum refin-ery), dimethyl ether (a diesel engine fuel or propane substitute), or an ethanol-rich mixed-alcohol product. Compared with installing new Tomlinson power/recovery systems, biorefineries would require more capital investment and greater purchases of woody residues for energy use. However, because biorefineries would be more efficient, have lower air emissions, and produce a more diverse product slate, for nearly all cases examined, the internal rate of return (IRR) on the incremental capital investment lies between 14% and 18%, assuming a $50/bbl world oil price. The IRRs would more than double if plausible federal and state financial incentives were captured. Industry-wide adoption of such biorefining in the United States would provide significant energy and environmental benefits to the country.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Biodiesel Production and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (11)
Show source-provided references
1. Larson, E.D., Consonni, S., Katofsky, R.E., et al., TAPPI J., 7(11): 8-14(2008).10.32964/TJ7.11.8 ↗
2. Larson, E.D., Consonni, S., Katofsky, R.E., et al., A Cost-Benefit Assessment of Gasification-Based Biorefining in the Kraft Pulp and Paper Industry, final report (in four volumes), December 21, 2006 (Downloadable from www.princeton.edu/~energy).10.2172/912520 ↗
3. Larson, E.D., Consonni, S., and Katofsky, R.E., A Cost-Benefit Assessment of Biomass Gasification Power Generation in the Pulp and Paper
4. Aden, A., Spath, P., and Atherton, B., The Potential of Thermochemical Ethanol via Mixed Alcohols Production, Milestone Completion Report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden CO, October 31, 2005.
5. McAloon, A., Taylor, F., Yee, W. et al., Determining the cost of producing ethanol from corn starch and lignocellulosic feedstocks, NREL/TP-580-28893, National Renewable Energy Lab, October 2000.10.2172/766198 ↗
6. Aden, A., Ruth, M., Ibsen, K., et al., Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid hydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover, NREL/TP-510-32438, National Renewable Energy Lab, June 2002.10.2172/1218326 ↗
7. TSS Consultants, Gridley Ethanol Demonstration Project Utilizing Biomass Gasification Technology: Pilot Plant Gasifier and Syngas Conversion Testing, August 2002-June 2004, NREL/SR-510-37581, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden CO, February 2005.10.2172/15011723 ↗
8. Larson, E.D., Jin, H., and Celik, F.E., “Large-Scale Gasification-Based Co-Production of Fuels and Electricity from Switchgrass,” accepted for publication in Biofuels, Bioproducts, and Biorefining, December 2008.10.1002/bbb.137 ↗
9. Ekbom, T., Berglin, N., and Logdberg, S., Black Liquor Gasification with Motor Fuel Production – BLGMF-II: A Techno-Economic Feasibility Study on Catalytic Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis for Synthetic Diesel Production in Comparison with Methanol and DME as Transport Fuels, P21384-1, Nykomb Synergetics AB, Stockholm, December 2005.
10. Larson, E.D., Williams, R.H., and Jin, H., 8th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Trondheim, Norway, June 2006.
11. Larson, E.D., Williams, R.H., and Jin, H., “Fuels and electricity from biomass with CO2 capture and storage, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Elsevier, London, 2007.