journal article·2019

Synthesis and characterization of novel foams by pyrolysis of lignin

Surojit Gupta, Maharshi Dey, Caleb Matzke, Grant Ellis, Sabah Javaid, Kathryn Hall, Yun Ji, Scott Payne

TAPPI Journal· Volume 18· Issue 01
Publisher page

Abstract

We report the synthesis and characterization of lignin-based foams by pyrolyzing cold pressed lignin compacts at 300°C, 500°C, 700°C, and 900°C in an argon (Ar) atmosphere. Detailed thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), thermomechanical analysis (TMA), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and microstucture analysis was performed on these samples. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray tomography analysis showed that all the foams had cellular structure, and had a total porosity of 93.3%, 94.5%, 93.9%, and 93.4% after pyrolysis at 300°C, 500°C, 700°C, and 900°C, respectively. Comparatively, the fraction of open porosity of the total porosity increased from 89.7% at 300°C to 97.1% and 98.1% at 500°C and 700°C, respectively, and then decreased to 93.0 % at 900°C. The averaged ultimate compressive strength (UCS) of the foams fabricated at 300°C was ~0.77 MPa. It decreased to ~0.49 MPa at 500°C, after which it increased to ~0.95 MPa at 700°C and then retained similar strength at 900°C. Detailed FTIR analysis showed a decreased in intensity of peaks for all the samples fabricated at higher temperatures, which was further correlated with changes in lignin molecular structure. By analyzing TGA, TMA, FTIR, and microstructure, a novel mechanism for designing lignin-based cellular solids has been proposed in this work. The wettability study by sessile drop test showed that the foams are hydrophobic after pyrolyzing at 300°C and 500°C, after which the compacts became hydrophilic after pyrolyzing at 700°C and 900°C, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Polymer Foaming and Composites · Polymer composites and self-healing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Duval, A. and Lawoko, M., React. Funct. Polym. 85: 78(2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.09.017.10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.09.017 ↗
2. Pandey, M.P. and Kim, C.S., Chem. Eng. Technol. 34: 29(2011).https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201000270.10.1002/ceat.201000270 ↗
3. Dai, J., Patti, A.F., and Saito, K., Tetrahedron Lett. 57: 4945(2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.09.084.10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.09.084 ↗
4. Cao, L., Yu, I.K.M, Liu, Y., et al., Bioresour. Technol., in press.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.065.10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.065 ↗
5. Alwadani, N. and Fatehi, P., Carbon Resour. Convers. 1: 126(2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2018.07.006.10.1016/j.crcon.2018.07.006 ↗
6. Azadi, P., Inderwildi, O.R., Farnood, R., et al., Renewable SustainableEnergy Rev. 21: 506(2013).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.022.10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.022 ↗
7. Yang, L., Seshan, K., and Li, Y., Catal. Today 298: 276(2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.11.030.10.1016/j.cattod.2016.11.030 ↗
8. Li, M.-F., Sun, S.-N., Xu, F., et al., Sep. Purif. Technol. 101: 18(2012).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.09.013.10.1016/j.seppur.2012.09.013 ↗
9. Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., et al., Fuel 86: 1781(2007).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013.10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013 ↗
10. Shrestha, B., le Brech, Y., Ghislain, T., et al., ACS Sustainable Chem.Eng. 5: 6940(2017).https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01130.10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01130 ↗
11. Sharma, R.K., Wooten, J.B., Baliga, V.L., et al., Fuel 83: 1469(2004).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2003.11.015.10.1016/j.fuel.2003.11.015 ↗
12. Jiang, X., Ellis, N., Shen, D., et al., Chem. Eng. Technol. 35:827(2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201000400.10.1002/ceat.201000400 ↗
13. Chen, X.Y. and Zhou Q.Q., Electrochim. Acta 71: 92(2012).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.166.10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.166 ↗
14. Inagaki, M., Qiu, J., and Guo, Q., Carbon 87: 128(2015).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.021.10.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.021 ↗
15. Yu, M., Zhong, C., Zhang, Y., et al., J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 134:293(2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.06.01910.1016/j.jaap.2018.06.019 ↗
16. Baran, D., Yardim, M.F., Atakül, H., et al., New Carbon Mater. 28:127(2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5805(13)60071-2.10.1016/S1872-5805(13)60071-2 ↗
17. Seo, J., Park, H., Shin, K., et al., Carbon 76: 357(2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.04.087.10.1016/j.carbon.2014.04.087 ↗
18. Chen, C., Kennel, E.B., Stiller, A.H., Carbon 44: 1535(2006).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.12.021.10.1016/j.carbon.2005.12.021 ↗
19. Chena, T., Lina, Q., Xionga, L., et al., J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 113:539(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.03.014.10.1016/j.jaap.2015.03.014 ↗
20. Jana, P., Fierro, V., and Celzard, A., Ind. Crops Prod. 89: 498(2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.06.001.10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.06.001 ↗
21. Lorjai, P., Wongkasemjit, S., and Chaisuwan, T., Mater. Sci. Eng., A527: 77(2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.07.032.10.1016/j.msea.2009.07.032 ↗
22. Farhan, S., Wang, R., Jiang, H., et al., Mater. Des. 101: 332(2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.008.10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.008 ↗
23. Qu, J.-Y., Han, Q., Gao, F., et al., New Carbon Mater. 32: 86(2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5805(17)60109-4.10.1016/S1872-5805(17)60109-4 ↗
24. Pham, T.N., Samikannu, A., Kukkola, J., et al., Scientific Reports 4: article number 6933(2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06933.10.1038/srep06933 ↗