Synthesis and characterization of novel foams by pyrolysis of lignin
Source abstract
Abstract
We report the synthesis and characterization of lignin-based foams by pyrolyzing cold pressed lignin compacts at 300°C, 500°C, 700°C, and 900°C in an argon (Ar) atmosphere. Detailed thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), thermomechanical analysis (TMA), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and microstucture analysis was performed on these samples. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray tomography analysis showed that all the foams had cellular structure, and had a total porosity of 93.3%, 94.5%, 93.9%, and 93.4% after pyrolysis at 300°C, 500°C, 700°C, and 900°C, respectively. Comparatively, the fraction of open porosity of the total porosity increased from 89.7% at 300°C to 97.1% and 98.1% at 500°C and 700°C, respectively, and then decreased to 93.0 % at 900°C. The averaged ultimate compressive strength (UCS) of the foams fabricated at 300°C was ~0.77 MPa. It decreased to ~0.49 MPa at 500°C, after which it increased to ~0.95 MPa at 700°C and then retained similar strength at 900°C. Detailed FTIR analysis showed a decreased in intensity of peaks for all the samples fabricated at higher temperatures, which was further correlated with changes in lignin molecular structure. By analyzing TGA, TMA, FTIR, and microstructure, a novel mechanism for designing lignin-based cellular solids has been proposed in this work. The wettability study by sessile drop test showed that the foams are hydrophobic after pyrolyzing at 300°C and 500°C, after which the compacts became hydrophilic after pyrolyzing at 700°C and 900°C, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Polymer Foaming and Composites · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Duval, A. and Lawoko, M., React. Funct. Polym. 85: 78(2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.09.017.10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.09.017 ↗
2. Pandey, M.P. and Kim, C.S., Chem. Eng. Technol. 34: 29(2011).https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201000270.10.1002/ceat.201000270 ↗
3. Dai, J., Patti, A.F., and Saito, K., Tetrahedron Lett. 57: 4945(2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.09.084.10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.09.084 ↗
4. Cao, L., Yu, I.K.M, Liu, Y., et al., Bioresour. Technol., in press.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.065.10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.065 ↗
5. Alwadani, N. and Fatehi, P., Carbon Resour. Convers. 1: 126(2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2018.07.006.10.1016/j.crcon.2018.07.006 ↗
6. Azadi, P., Inderwildi, O.R., Farnood, R., et al., Renewable SustainableEnergy Rev. 21: 506(2013).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.022.10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.022 ↗
7. Yang, L., Seshan, K., and Li, Y., Catal. Today 298: 276(2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.11.030.10.1016/j.cattod.2016.11.030 ↗
8. Li, M.-F., Sun, S.-N., Xu, F., et al., Sep. Purif. Technol. 101: 18(2012).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.09.013.10.1016/j.seppur.2012.09.013 ↗
9. Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., et al., Fuel 86: 1781(2007).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013.10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013 ↗
10. Shrestha, B., le Brech, Y., Ghislain, T., et al., ACS Sustainable Chem.Eng. 5: 6940(2017).https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01130.10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01130 ↗
11. Sharma, R.K., Wooten, J.B., Baliga, V.L., et al., Fuel 83: 1469(2004).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2003.11.015.10.1016/j.fuel.2003.11.015 ↗
12. Jiang, X., Ellis, N., Shen, D., et al., Chem. Eng. Technol. 35:827(2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201000400.10.1002/ceat.201000400 ↗
13. Chen, X.Y. and Zhou Q.Q., Electrochim. Acta 71: 92(2012).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.166.10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.166 ↗
14. Inagaki, M., Qiu, J., and Guo, Q., Carbon 87: 128(2015).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.021.10.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.021 ↗
15. Yu, M., Zhong, C., Zhang, Y., et al., J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 134:293(2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.06.01910.1016/j.jaap.2018.06.019 ↗
16. Baran, D., Yardim, M.F., Atakül, H., et al., New Carbon Mater. 28:127(2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5805(13)60071-2.10.1016/S1872-5805(13)60071-2 ↗
17. Seo, J., Park, H., Shin, K., et al., Carbon 76: 357(2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.04.087.10.1016/j.carbon.2014.04.087 ↗
18. Chen, C., Kennel, E.B., Stiller, A.H., Carbon 44: 1535(2006).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.12.021.10.1016/j.carbon.2005.12.021 ↗
19. Chena, T., Lina, Q., Xionga, L., et al., J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 113:539(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.03.014.10.1016/j.jaap.2015.03.014 ↗
20. Jana, P., Fierro, V., and Celzard, A., Ind. Crops Prod. 89: 498(2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.06.001.10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.06.001 ↗
21. Lorjai, P., Wongkasemjit, S., and Chaisuwan, T., Mater. Sci. Eng., A527: 77(2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.07.032.10.1016/j.msea.2009.07.032 ↗
22. Farhan, S., Wang, R., Jiang, H., et al., Mater. Des. 101: 332(2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.008.10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.008 ↗
23. Qu, J.-Y., Han, Q., Gao, F., et al., New Carbon Mater. 32: 86(2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5805(17)60109-4.10.1016/S1872-5805(17)60109-4 ↗
24. Pham, T.N., Samikannu, A., Kukkola, J., et al., Scientific Reports 4: article number 6933(2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06933.10.1038/srep06933 ↗