journal article·2015-06-01

Rheological characterization of microfibrillated cellulose suspension using optical coherence tomography

SANNA HAAVISTO, JUHA SALMELA, ARI JÄSBERG, TAPIO SAARINEN, ANNI KARPPINEN, ANTTI KOPONEN

TAPPI Journal· Volume 14· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Fiber suspensions, such as microfibrillated cellulose, are a challenge for conventional rheometers to measure. This is because rheometers have small flow channel dimensions that can restrict flocculation. Often, questionable assumptions are also made about the fluid behavior in the gap. A pipe rheometer and ultrasound velocity profiling-pressure difference (UVP-PD) concept can be used, by which the real flow behavior is used for the rheological analysis of the bulk properties of the suspension. Unfortunately, the resolution of UVP is too low for studying near-wall phenomena, such as the lubrication layer, that are often very important for understanding the rheology and to upscale the results to industrial flows. To address this problem, we have widened the UVP-PD concept with optical coherence tomography measurements. This enables us to measure the bulk and wall-layer behavior simultaneously. Our results demonstrate the benefits of having direct, detailed measurement of the velocity profile inside the rheometer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Optical Coherence Tomography Applications · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Haavisto, S., Lille, M., Liukkonen, J., et al., “Laboratory-scale pipe rheometry: a study of a microfibrillated cellulose suspension,” PaperCon, TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2011.
2. Ouriev, B. and Windhab, E.J., Exp. Fluids 32(2): 204(2002).10.1007/s003480100345 ↗
3. Ouriev, B., Windhab, E.J., Braun, P., et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75(10): 3164(2004).10.1063/1.1790585 ↗
4. Dogan, N., McCarthy, M.J., and Powell, R.L., Meas. Sci. Technol.16(8): 1684(2005).10.1088/0957-0233/16/8/021 ↗
5. Wiklund, J. and Stading, M., Flow Meas. Instrum. 19(3-4): 171(2008).10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2007.11.002 ↗
6. Steger, R., “Optisch und Akustische Methoden in Der Rheometrie,” Dissertation, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany, 1994.
7. Müller, M., Brunn, P.O., and Wunderlich, T., Appl. Rheol. 7(5): 204(1997).10.2478/arh-1997-070505 ↗
8. Salmela, J., Haavisto, S., Koponen, A., et al., Fundam. Res. Symp., 15th, The Pulp and Paper Fundamental Research Society, Bury, Lancashire, UK, 2013, p. 405.
9. Jäsberg, A., “Flow behavior of fiber suspensions in straight pipes: new experimental techniques and multiphase modelling”, Ph.D. thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland, 2007.
10. Chow, A., Sinton, S., and Iwamiya, J., Phys. Fluids 6(8): 2561(1994).10.1063/1.868147 ↗
11. Takeda, Y., Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 10(4): 444(1995).10.1016/0894-1777(94)00124-Q ↗
12. Harvey, M. and Waigh, T.A., Phys. Rev. E: Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 83(3 Pt 1): 031502(2011).
13. Haavisto, S., Koponen, A., Salmela, J., Front. Chem. 2: 27(2014).10.3389/fchem.2014.00027 ↗
14. Haavisto, S., Salmela, J., Koponen, A., Exp. Fluids 56(5): 1(2015).10.1007/s00348-015-1962-2 ↗
15. Haavisto, S., Salmela, J., Jäsberg, A., et al., PaperCon, TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2013, p. 1119.
16. Lavoine, N., Desloges, I., Dufresne, A., et al., Carbohydr. Polym. 90(2): 735(2012).10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026 ↗
17. Lowys, M., Desbrières, J., and Rinaudo, M., Food Hydrocolloids 15(1): 25(2001).10.1016/S0268-005X(00)00046-1 ↗
18. Pääkkö, M., Ankerfors, M., Kosonen, H., et al., Biomacromolecules 8(6): 1934(2007).10.1021/bm061215p ↗
19. Agoda-Tandjawa, G., Durand, S., Berot, S., et al., Carbohydr. Polym. 80(3): 677(2010).10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.11.045 ↗
20. Iotti, M., Gregersen, O.W., Moe, S., et al., J. Polym. Environ. 19(1): 137(2011).10.1007/s10924-010-0248-2 ↗
21. Saarikoski, E., Saarinen, T., Salmela, J., et al., Cellulose 19(3): 647(2012).10.1007/s10570-012-9661-0 ↗
22. Karppinen, A., Saarinen, T., Salmela, J., et al., Cellulose 19(6): 1807(2012).10.1007/s10570-012-9766-5 ↗
23. Kasai, C., Namekawa, K., Koyano, A., et al., IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason. 32(3): 458(1985).10.1109/T-SU.1985.31615 ↗
24. Tatsumi, D., Ishioka, S., and Matsumoto, T., J. Soc. Rheol., Jpn. 32(1): 27(2002).10.1678/rheology.30.27 ↗
25. White, F.M., Fluid Mechanics, 3rd edn., McGraw-Hill Education, New York, 1994, pp. 310-315.
26. Spalding, D.B., J. Appl. Mech., 28(3): 455(1961).10.1115/1.3641728 ↗
27. Saarinen, T., Haavisto, S., Sorvari, A., et al., Cellulose 21(3): 1261(2014).10.1007/s10570-014-0187-5 ↗