journal article·2008-06-01Open access

Effect of Eucalyptus globulus wood density on papermaking potential

ANTONIO SANTOS, MARIA EMILIA AMARAL, ALVARO VAZ, OFELIA ANJOS, ROGERIO SIMOES

TAPPI Journal· Volume 7· Issue 5

Abstract

It is well documented that the characteristics of raw materials determine the papermaking potential of the pulp. The variability of the wood used by the pulp mills is extremely wide. We report on the behavior of three Eucalyptus globulus wood chip samples with basic densities of 0.467, 0.537, and 0.600 g/cm3, in kraft cooking and papermaking. The pulp yield range of 49%–58.7% was attributed to the different wood chemical composition, in particular to the lignin content and relative proportion of cellulose and hemicelluloses. The morphological characteristics of the pulp fibers were also markedly different. The average fiber length is 0.71, 0.80, and 0.85 mm, respectively for the E. globulus of low, intermediate, and high wood basic density. The pulp fibers from the lowest density wood exhibit very high wet fiber flexibility, while those from the highest density wood exhibit rigid behavior. Using this structural property as reference, the corresponding papers are stronger, but exhibit lower light scattering coefficients than those from the lowest density wood
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Kibblewhite, R.P., Bawden, A.D., and Hughes, M.C., Appita J. 44(5): 325(1991).
2. Santos, A., Anjos, O., and Simões, R., Appita J. 59(1): 58(2006).
3. Paavilainen, L., Paperi Puu 82(3): 156(2000).10.22546/62/2265 ↗
4. Paavilainen, L., PaperiPuu 71(4): 356(1989).10.2307/1926985 ↗
5. Downes, G., Evans, R., Wimmer, R., et al., Appita J. 56(3): 221(2003).
6. Evans, R., Kibblewhite, R.P., and Lausberg, M., Appita J. 52(2): 132(1999).
7. Valente, C.A., Mendes de Sousa, A.P., Furtado, F.P. et al., Appita J. 45(6): 403(1992).
8. Greaves, B.G. and Borralho, N.M.G., Appita J. 49(2): 90(1996).
9. Kibblewhite, R.P., Evans, R., and Riddell, M.J.C., 57th Appita Annual General Conference Proceedings, APPITA, Carlton, Victoria, Australia, 2003, p. 99.
10. Neto, C.P., Seca, A., Fradinho, D., et al., Industrial Crops and Products 5:189(1996).10.1016/0926-6690(96)89448-9 ↗
11. Blakeney, A.B., Harris, P.J., Henry, R.J., et al., Carbohydr. Res. 113(2): 291(1983).10.1016/0008-6215(83)88244-5 ↗
12. Steadman, R.K. and Luner, P., ESPRA Rep. No. 79, Chap. V, Syracuse, New York, USA, 1995.
13. Silvy, J., Romatier, G., and Chiodi, R., Revue A.T.I.P. 22(1): 31(1968).
14. Miranda, I., Tomé, M., and Pereira, H., Appita J. 56(2): 140(2003).
15. Seth, R.S., TAPPI J. 82 (3):147(1999).
16. French, J., Conn, A.B., Batchelor, W.J. et al., Appita J. 53(3): 200(2000).
17. Leopold, B. and Thorpe, J., Tappi 51(7): 304(1968).10.1038/jid.1968.133 ↗