Nematode Uptake Preference toward Different Nanoplastics through Avoidance Behavior Regulation
Source abstract
Abstract
Expounding bioaccumulation pathways of nanoplastics in organisms is a prerequisite for assessing their ecological risks in the context of global plastic pollution. Invertebrate uptake preference toward nanoplastics is a key initial step of nanoplastic food chain transport that controls their global biosafety, while the biological regulatory mechanism remains unclear. Here, we reveal a preferential uptake mechanism involving active avoidance of nanoplastics by Caenorhabditis elegans and demonstrate the relationship between the uptake preference and nanoplastic characteristics. Nanoplastics with 100 nm in size or positive surface charges induce stronger avoidance due to higher toxicity, causing lower accumulation in nematodes, compared to the 500 nm-sized or negatively charged nanoplastics, respectively. Further evidence showed that nematodes did not actively ingest any types of nanoplastics, while different nanoplastics induced defense responses in a toxicity-dependent manner and distinctly stimulated the avoidance behavior of nematodes (ranged from 15.8 to 68.7%). Transcriptomics and validations using mutants confirmed that the insulin/IGF signaling (IIS) pathway is essential for the selective avoidance of nanoplastics. Specifically, the activation of DAF-16 promoted the IIS pathway-mediated defense against nanoplastics and stimulated the avoidance behavior, increasing the survival chances of nematodes. Considering the genetical universality of this defense response among invertebrates, such an uptake preference toward certain nanoplastics could lead to cascaded risks in the ecosystem.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microplastics and Plastic Pollution · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Organic Pollution Process and Control, Department of Environmental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong China
Zhejiang Ecological Civilization Academy, Anji 313300, China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China · Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/sciadv.170078210.1126/sciadv.1700782 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41565-021-00888-210.1038/s41565-021-00888-2 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.aar773410.1126/science.aar7734 ↗
4. PlasticsEurope · 2021
5. 10.1126/science.aba365610.1126/science.aba3656 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467-018-03825-510.1038/s41467-018-03825-5 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-021-27454-710.1038/s41467-021-27454-7 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.abh094510.1126/science.abh0945 ↗
9. 10.1111/gcb.1541610.1111/gcb.15416 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.01.07010.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.01.070 ↗
11. 10.1098/rstb.2008.020510.1098/rstb.2008.0205 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.est.7b0356710.1021/acs.est.7b03567 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.10596110.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105961 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10311-022-01539-110.1007/s10311-022-01539-1 ↗
15. 10.1093/biosci/biz08610.1093/biosci/biz086 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41586-019-1418-610.1038/s41586-019-1418-6 ↗
17. 10.1073/pnas.090403610610.1073/pnas.0904036106 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-022-33334-510.1038/s41467-022-33334-5 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41565-020-0707-410.1038/s41565-020-0707-4 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.est.2c0805910.1021/acs.est.2c08059 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.est.1c0175310.1021/acs.est.1c01753 ↗
22. 10.1038/nature0421610.1038/nature04216 ↗
23. 10.1038/nature1064310.1038/nature10643 ↗
24. 10.3389/fmars.2021.80078210.3389/fmars.2021.800782 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41467-022-32532-510.1038/s41467-022-32532-5 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.est.1c0850310.1021/acs.est.1c08503 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.12026710.1016/j.envpol.2022.120267 ↗
28. 10.1021/es403170f10.1021/es403170f ↗
29. 10.1038/ncomms1422110.1038/ncomms14221 ↗
30. Avery, L.; You, Y. J. C. elegans Feeding. In WormBook 2012, 1–23, DOI: 10.1895/wormbook.1.150.110.1895/wormbook.1.150.1.10.1895/wormbook.1.150.1 ↗
31. Raizen, D.; Song, B. m.; Trojanowski, N.; You, Y. J., Methods for Measuring Pharyngeal Behaviors. In WormBook 2012, 1–13, 10.1895/wormbook.1.154.1DOI: 10.1895/wormbook.1.154.1.10.1895/wormbook.1.154.1 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0524510.1021/acsnano.3c05245 ↗
33. 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2020.12.00710.1016/bs.ctdb.2020.12.007 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.11322710.1016/j.envpol.2019.113227 ↗
35. 10.1242/jeb.0195510.1242/jeb.01955 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.05010.1016/j.cell.2012.02.050 ↗
37. 10.1038/ncomms321010.1038/ncomms3210 ↗
38. 10.1111/raq.1232910.1111/raq.12329 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41467-019-13636-x10.1038/s41467-019-13636-x ↗
40. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0221510.1021/acsnano.3c02215 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0972910.1021/acsnano.2c09729 ↗
42. 10.1017/S0140525X0001411410.1017/S0140525X00014114 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41467-023-39804-810.1038/s41467-023-39804-8 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.02410.1016/j.cell.2019.05.024 ↗
45. 10.1038/nature0178910.1038/nature01789 ↗
46. 10.1126/science.108014710.1126/science.1080147 ↗
47. 10.1038/4019410.1038/40194 ↗
48. 10.1038/8885010.1038/88850 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00594-210.1016/S0960-9822(01)00594-2 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.chom.2009.04.01210.1016/j.chom.2009.04.012 ↗
51. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00889-410.1016/S0092-8674(03)00889-4 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.10270610.1016/j.isci.2021.102706 ↗
53. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00435.x10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00435.x ↗
54. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac68f710.1088/1748-9326/ac68f7 ↗
55. 10.1126/science.abe029010.1126/science.abe0290 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.est.1c0659510.1021/acs.est.1c06595 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.est.8b0420010.1021/acs.est.8b04200 ↗
58. Shaham, S., Methods in Cell Biology. In WormBook 2006, 1–75, 10.1895/wormbook.1.49.1DOI: 10.1895/wormbook.1.49.1.10.1895/wormbook.1.49.1 ↗
59. Hart, A. C., Behavior. In WormBook 2006, 1–67, DOI: 10.1895/wormbook.1.87.110.1895/wormbook.1.87.1.10.1895/wormbook.1.87.1 ↗