journal article·2023-06-13Open access

A Liquid Biopsy-Based Approach to Isolate and Characterize Adipose Tissue-Derived Extracellular Vesicles from Blood

Shalini Mishra, Ashish Kumar, Susy Kim, Yixin Su, Sangeeta Singh, Mitu Sharma, Sameh Almousa, Hilal A. Rather, Heetanshi Jain, Jingyun Lee, Cristina M. Furdui, Sarfaraz Ahmad, Carlos M. Ferrario, Henry A. Punzi, Chia-Chi Chuang, Martin Wabitsch, Stephen B. Kritchevsky, Thomas C. Register, Gagan Deep

ACS Nano· Volume 17· Issue 11

Abstract

Obesity is a major risk factor for multiple chronic diseases. Anthropometric and imaging approaches are primarily used to assess adiposity, and there is a dearth of techniques to determine the changes in adipose tissue (AT) at the molecular level. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as a novel and less invasive source of biomarkers for various pathologies. Furthermore, the possibility of enriching cell or tissue-specific EVs from the biofluids based on their unique surface markers has led to classifying these vesicles as “liquid biopsies”, offering valuable molecular information on hard-to-access tissues. Here, we isolated small EVs from AT (sEV AT ) of lean and diet-induced obese (DIO) mice, identified unique surface proteins on sEV AT by surface shaving followed by mass spectrometry, and developed a signature of five unique proteins. Using this signature, we pulled out sEV AT from the blood of mice and validated the specificity of isolated sEV AT by measuring the expression of adiponectin, 38 adipokines on an array, and several adipose tissue-related miRNAs. Furthermore, we provided evidence of sEV applicability in disease prediction by characterizing sEV AT from the blood of lean and DIO mice. Interestingly, sEV AT-DIO cargo showed a stronger pro-inflammatory effect on THP1 monocytes compared to sEV AT-Lean and a significant increase in obesity-associated miRNA expression. Equally important, sEV AT cargo revealed an obesity-associated aberrant amino acid metabolism that was subsequently validated in the corresponding AT. Lastly, we show a significant increase in inflammation-related molecules in sEV AT isolated from the blood of nondiabetic obese (>30 kg/m 2 ) individuals. Overall, the present study offers a less-invasive approach to characterize AT.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Extracellular vesicles in disease · Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity · Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States

Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States

Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Molecular Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States

Laboratory of Translational Hypertension, Department of General Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States

Punzi Medical Center, Punzi Institute of Medicine, Carrollton, Texas 75006, United States

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States

Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Center for Rare Endocrine Diseases, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm 89069, Germany

Department of Internal Medicine-Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States

Sticht Center for Healthy Aging and Alzheimer’s Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States

Department of Pathology, Section on Comparative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States

Funding

National Institute on Aging

References (76)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.08.00410.1016/j.mcna.2017.08.004 ↗
2. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.30688510.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306885 ↗
3. 10.1371/journal.pone.010348310.1371/journal.pone.0103483 ↗
4. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm02610.1093/eurheartj/ehm026 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.09.00410.1016/j.numecd.2014.09.004 ↗
6. 10.1210/jc.2009-158410.1210/jc.2009-1584 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41366-018-0309-510.1038/s41366-018-0309-5 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.12.04810.1016/j.jacc.2007.12.048 ↗
9. 10.1124/pr.112.00598310.1124/pr.112.005983 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.07.01210.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.07.012 ↗
11. 10.18632/oncotarget.447910.18632/oncotarget.4479 ↗
12. 10.1002/mc.2212410.1002/mc.22124 ↗
13. 10.3402/jev.v1i0.1839610.3402/jev.v1i0.18396 ↗
14. 10.1002/cam4.188510.1002/cam4.1885 ↗
15. 10.3390/cancers1102015410.3390/cancers11020154 ↗
16. 10.18632/oncotarget.1424710.18632/oncotarget.14247 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.04.00110.1016/j.dadm.2016.04.001 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.06.00810.1016/j.jalz.2014.06.008 ↗
19. 10.1002/alz.1216610.1002/alz.12166 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41380-021-01255-210.1038/s41380-021-01255-2 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.10319210.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103192 ↗
22. 10.1002/alz.1305510.1002/alz.13055 ↗
23. 10.1093/braincomms/fcac26210.1093/braincomms/fcac262 ↗
24. 10.1002/oby.2170910.1002/oby.21709 ↗
25. 10.1080/20013078.2018.153575010.1080/20013078.2018.1535750 ↗
26. 10.1002/pro.330710.1002/pro.3307 ↗
27. 10.3390/ijms1806132110.3390/ijms18061321 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.09.09810.1016/j.bbrc.2009.09.098 ↗
29. 10.1371/journal.pone.000469910.1371/journal.pone.0004699 ↗
30. 10.1128/MCB.00894-1010.1128/MCB.00894-10 ↗
31. 10.1038/nature1011210.1038/nature10112 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00018-020-03699-110.1007/s00018-020-03699-1 ↗
33. 10.1371/journal.pone.008680010.1371/journal.pone.0086800 ↗
34. 10.18632/aging.20231910.18632/aging.202319 ↗
35. 10.1155/2020/689468410.1155/2020/6894684 ↗
36. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-32010.1186/1471-2164-11-320 ↗
37. 10.1155/2018/735190210.1155/2018/7351902 ↗
38. 10.1017/S000711450783805010.1017/S0007114507838050 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.12.00810.1016/j.cmet.2010.12.008 ↗
40. 10.1152/ajpcell.00379.202010.1152/ajpcell.00379.2020 ↗
41. 10.3389/fphys.2019.0160710.3389/fphys.2019.01607 ↗
42. 10.1053/gast.2002.3551410.1053/gast.2002.35514 ↗
43. 10.1161/01.RES.0000163635.62927.3410.1161/01.RES.0000163635.62927.34 ↗
44. Park Y. M. · Mo Med. · 2014 · 111 · 65
45. 10.1152/ajpcell.1993.265.1.C23410.1152/ajpcell.1993.265.1.C234 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.bcp.2003.12.03910.1016/j.bcp.2003.12.039 ↗
47. 10.1210/jc.2011-031010.1210/jc.2011-0310 ↗
48. 10.1371/journal.pone.006824910.1371/journal.pone.0068249 ↗
49. 10.1038/nrd258910.1038/nrd2589 ↗
50. 10.1172/jci.insight.14196210.1172/jci.insight.141962 ↗
51. 10.1210/en.2018-0026610.1210/en.2018-00266 ↗
52. 10.1080/2001409108422710.1080/20014091084227 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ab.2011.03.02610.1016/j.ab.2011.03.026 ↗
54. 10.1007/s00125-006-0418-x10.1007/s00125-006-0418-x ↗
55. 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.03.00210.1016/j.cmet.2012.03.002 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.10.01110.1016/j.cmet.2013.10.011 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.molmet.2021.10130010.1016/j.molmet.2021.101300 ↗
58. 10.2337/db17-152110.2337/db17-1521 ↗
59. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01852.x10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01852.x ↗
60. 10.1038/nm116610.1038/nm1166 ↗
61. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.06967.x10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.06967.x ↗
62. 10.1073/pnas.080017810510.1073/pnas.0800178105 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.mce.2016.08.03710.1016/j.mce.2016.08.037 ↗
64. 10.1007/s40200-019-00404-310.1007/s40200-019-00404-3 ↗
65. 10.1128/MCB.00192-0910.1128/MCB.00192-09 ↗
66. 10.1111/obr.1282810.1111/obr.12828 ↗
67. 10.1177/00221554020500070110.1177/002215540205000701 ↗
68. 10.1136/jmg.31.11.87510.1136/jmg.31.11.875 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.nutres.2019.03.01210.1016/j.nutres.2019.03.012 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2021.15888710.1016/j.bbalip.2021.158887 ↗
71. 10.2337/db19-117410.2337/db19-1174 ↗
72. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800280-3.00004-910.1016/B978-0-12-800280-3.00004-9 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.mce.2021.11125610.1016/j.mce.2021.111256 ↗
74. 10.1038/s41366-022-01199-910.1038/s41366-022-01199-9 ↗
75. 10.1038/s41386-022-01444-910.1038/s41386-022-01444-9 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.04.01510.1016/j.ymeth.2015.04.015 ↗