Enhancing the Purity of Deterministically Placed Quantum Emitters in Monolayer WSe2
Source abstract
Abstract
We present a method utilizing an applied electrostatic potential for suppressing the broad defect bound excitonic emission in two-dimensional materials (2DMs) which otherwise inhibits the purity of strain induced single photon emitters (SPEs). Our heterostructure consists of a WSe2 monolayer on a polymer in which strain has been deterministically introduced via an atomic force microscope (AFM) tip. We show that by applying an electrostatic potential, the broad defect bound background is suppressed at cryogenic temperatures, resulting in a substantial improvement in single photon purity demonstrated by a 10-fold reduction of the correlation function g(2)(0) value from 0.73 to 0.07. In addition, we see a 2-fold increase in the intensity of the SPEs as well as the ability to activate/deactivate the emitters at certain wavelengths. Finally, we present an increase in the operating temperature of the SPE up to 110 K, a 50 K increase when compared with the results when no electrostatic potential is present.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Perovskite Materials and Applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
KBR Inc., Beavercreek, Ohio 45431, United States
Materials Science & Technology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375, United States
Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, United States
Sensors Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, United States
Funding
Air Force Research Laboratory · Air Force Office of Scientific Research
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.34710.1103/RevModPhys.87.347 ↗
2. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.22910.1038/nphoton.2009.229 ↗
3. 10.1021/nn500064s10.1021/nn500064s ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.18790110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.187901 ↗
5. 10.1038/ncomms1505310.1038/ncomms15053 ↗
6. 10.1038/ncomms1509310.1038/ncomms15093 ↗
7. 10.1364/OPTICA.5.00112810.1364/OPTICA.5.001128 ↗
8. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.18610.1038/nphoton.2016.186 ↗
9. 10.1063/5.005411610.1063/5.0054116 ↗
10. 10.1063/5.007209110.1063/5.0072091 ↗
11. 10.1515/nanoph-2019-014010.1515/nanoph-2019-0140 ↗
12. 10.1116/5.001131610.1116/5.0011316 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-019-12421-010.1038/s41467-019-12421-0 ↗
14. 10.1038/nnano.2015.6010.1038/nnano.2015.60 ↗
15. 10.1038/nnano.2015.6710.1038/nnano.2015.67 ↗
16. 10.1038/nnano.2015.7510.1038/nnano.2015.75 ↗
17. 10.1038/nnano.2015.7910.1038/nnano.2015.79 ↗
18. 10.1364/OPTICA.2.00034710.1364/OPTICA.2.000347 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0331210.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03312 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20160056010.1002/adma.201600560 ↗
21. 10.1038/nnano.2015.24210.1038/nnano.2015.242 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.509177910.1063/1.5091779 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-021-23709-510.1038/s41467-021-23709-5 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0873010.1021/acsnano.8b08730 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0422210.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04222 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0428210.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04282 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41467-021-27033-w10.1038/s41467-021-27033-w ↗
28. 10.1088/2053-1583/ab15fe10.1088/2053-1583/ab15fe ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.05740310.1103/PhysRevLett.121.057403 ↗
30. 10.1063/5.001543110.1063/5.0015431 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0136410.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01364 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.04530710.1103/PhysRevB.100.045307 ↗
33. 10.1038/nnano.2017.10610.1038/nnano.2017.106 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41467-019-10477-610.1038/s41467-019-10477-6 ↗
35. 10.1038/s41467-021-21158-810.1038/s41467-021-21158-8 ↗
36. 10.1002/qute.20190002210.1002/qute.201900022 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.489547110.1063/1.4895471 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.473778510.1063/1.4737785 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.199266610.1063/1.1992666 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0136910.1021/acsnano.8b01369 ↗