journal article·2022-02-22Open access

Polymer-Conjugated Carbon Nanotubes for Biomolecule Loading

Christopher T. Jackson, Jeffrey W. Wang, Eduardo González-Grandío, Natalie S. Goh, Jaewan Mun, Sejal Krishnan, Florian Ludwig Geyer, Harald Keller, Sophia Ebert, Kian Molawi, Nadine Kaiser, Markita P. Landry

ACS Nano· Volume 16· Issue 2

Abstract

Nanomaterials have emerged as an invaluable tool for the delivery of biomolecules such as DNA and RNA, with various applications in genetic engineering and post-transcriptional genetic manipulation. Alongside this development, there has been an increasing use of polymer-based techniques, such as polyethylenimine (PEI), to electrostatically load polynucleotide cargoes onto nanomaterial carriers. However, there remains a need to assess nanomaterial properties, conjugation conditions, and biocompatibility of these nanomaterial-polymer constructs, particularly for use in plant systems. In this work, we develop mechanisms to optimize DNA loading on single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) with a library of polymer-SWNT constructs and assess DNA loading ability, polydispersity, and both chemical and colloidal stability. Counterintuitively, we demonstrate that polymer hydrolysis from nanomaterial surfaces can occur depending on polymer properties and attachment chemistries, and we describe mitigation strategies against construct degradation. Given the growing interest in delivery applications in plant systems, we also assess the stress response of plants to polymer-based nanomaterials and provide recommendations for future design of nanomaterial-based polynucleotide delivery strategies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

BASF, Carl-Bosch-Strasse 38, 67056 Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany

Innovative Genomics Institute (IGI), Berkeley, California 94720, United States

California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, QB3, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

Chan-Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, California 94158, United States

Funding

Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research · Biological and Environmental Research · Innovative Genomics Institute · National Institute of Food and Agriculture · Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation · Burroughs Wellcome Fund · National Science Foundation · U.S. Department of Agriculture · Parkinson's Foundation · Chan Zuckerberg Biohub

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.03.00910.1016/j.tibtech.2018.03.009 ↗
2. 10.1186/1471-2229-10-29110.1186/1471-2229-10-291 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11240-017-1259-710.1007/s11240-017-1259-7 ↗
4. 10.1021/bm301275g10.1021/bm301275g ↗
5. 10.1002/jgm.69610.1002/jgm.696 ↗
6. 10.1002/bit.2044410.1002/bit.20444 ↗
7. 10.1073/pnas.98.3.120010.1073/pnas.98.3.1200 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11095-004-1874-y10.1007/s11095-004-1874-y ↗
9. 10.1007/s11095-007-9279-310.1007/s11095-007-9279-3 ↗
10. 10.1002/eji.20124241010.1002/eji.201242410 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.19258149910.1073/pnas.192581499 ↗
12. 10.1073/pnas.123363410010.1073/pnas.1233634100 ↗
13. 10.1002/smll.20090151310.1002/smll.200901513 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0446710.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04467 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41565-019-0382-510.1038/s41565-019-0382-5 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c0024710.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00247 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.pbi.2021.10205210.1016/j.pbi.2021.102052 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41596-019-0208-910.1038/s41596-019-0208-9 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20191055610.1002/adfm.201910556 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10904-012-9689-510.1007/s10904-012-9689-5 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41598-018-33674-710.1038/s41598-018-33674-7 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10973-016-5671-810.1007/s10973-016-5671-8 ↗
23. 10.1021/cm071758l10.1021/cm071758l ↗
24. 10.1021/cm103069z10.1021/cm103069z ↗
25. 10.1039/b712614j10.1039/b712614j ↗
26. 10.1021/jp035719i10.1021/jp035719i ↗
27. 10.1038/s41565-019-0375-410.1038/s41565-019-0375-4 ↗
28. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz049510.1126/sciadv.aaz0495 ↗
29. 10.1021/bm900842d10.1021/bm900842d ↗
30. 10.1039/D0AN00633E10.1039/D0AN00633E ↗
31. 10.1021/nl015680y10.1021/nl015680y ↗
32. 10.1002/anie.20200817510.1002/anie.202008175 ↗
33. 10.1021/jacs.9b0961710.1021/jacs.9b09617 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.02.00710.1016/j.tiv.2017.02.007 ↗
35. 10.1094/MPMI-21-8-101510.1094/MPMI-21-8-1015 ↗
36. 10.1105/tpc.2.2.9510.1105/tpc.2.2.95 ↗
37. 10.1101/gr.080275.10810.1101/gr.080275.108 ↗
38. González-Grandío, E.; Demirer, G. S.; Jackson, C. T.; Yang, D.; Landry, M. P. Carbon Nanotube Biocompatibility in Plants Is Determined by Their Surface Chemistry. bioRxiv , https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.29.454380 (accessed December 15, 2021).10.1101/2021.07.29.454380 ↗