journal article·2020-06-23Open access

Alkali Doping Leads to Charge-Transfer Salt Formation in a Two-Dimensional Metal–Organic Framework

Phil J. Blowey, Billal Sohail, Luke A. Rochford, Timothy Lafosse, David A. Duncan, Paul T. P. Ryan, Daniel Andrew Warr, Tien-Lin Lee, Giovanni Costantini, Reinhard J. Maurer, David Phillip Woodruff

ACS Nano· Volume 14· Issue 6

Abstract

Efficient charge transfer across metal-organic interfaces is a key physical process in modern organic electronics devices, and characterization of the energy level alignment at the interface is crucial to enable a rational device design. We show that the insertion of alkali atoms can significantly change the structure and electronic properties of a metal-organic interface. Coadsorption of tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) and potassium on a Ag(111) surface leads to the formation of a two-dimensional charge transfer salt, with properties quite different from those of the two-dimensional Ag adatom TCNQ metal-organic framework formed in the absence of K doping. We establish a highly accurate structural model by combination of quantitative X-ray standing wave measurements, scanning tunnelling microscopy, and density-functional theory (DFT) calculations. Full agreement between the experimental data and the computational prediction of the structure is only achieved by inclusion of a charge-transfer-scaled dispersion correction in the DFT, which correctly accounts for the effects of strong charge transfer on the atomic polarizability of potassium. The commensurate surface layer formed by TCNQ and K is dominated by strong charge transfer and ionic bonding and is accompanied by a structural and electronic decoupling from the underlying metal substrate. The consequence is a significant change in energy level alignment and work function compared to TCNQ on Ag(111). Possible implications of charge-transfer salt formation at metal-organic interfaces for organic thin-film devices are discussed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Organic and Molecular Conductors Research · Surface Chemistry and Catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.

Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.

Chemistry Department, University of Birmingham, University Road, Birmingham B15 2TT, U.K.

Diamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0DE, U.K.

Department of Materials, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · UK Research and Innovation · FP7 Ideas: European Research Council

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C5RA26320D10.1039/C5RA26320D ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.25680110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.256801 ↗
3. 10.1038/nchem.59110.1038/nchem.591 ↗
4. 10.1088/0953-8984/25/48/48400710.1088/0953-8984/25/48/484007 ↗
5. 10.1002/pssb.20114713610.1002/pssb.201147136 ↗
6. 10.1021/jp306780n10.1021/jp306780n ↗
7. 10.1039/C6NR06527A10.1039/C6NR06527A ↗
8. 10.1039/C8NR02237B10.1039/C8NR02237B ↗
9. 10.1039/c1jm12783g10.1039/c1jm12783g ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.23760110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.237601 ↗
11. 10.1002/adfm.20120136610.1002/adfm.201201366 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.5b0083910.1021/acsami.5b00839 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.orgel.2011.03.00810.1016/j.orgel.2011.03.008 ↗
14. 10.1021/nn403274s10.1021/nn403274s ↗
15. 10.1088/0034-4885/68/4/R0110.1088/0034-4885/68/4/R01 ↗
16. 10.1039/C7FD00093F10.1039/C7FD00093F ↗
17. 10.1021/nl072466m10.1021/nl072466m ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.01.01410.1016/j.ccr.2017.01.014 ↗
19. 10.1039/C1CC14497A10.1039/C1CC14497A ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.80510.1103/PhysRevB.31.805 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0714510.1021/acsnano.5b07145 ↗
22. Hermann, K. E.; Van Hove, M. A. LEEDpat4, version 4.2; Fritz Haber Institute: Berlin, 2015.
23. 10.1088/1367-2630/ab825f10.1088/1367-2630/ab825f ↗
24. 10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b0092510.1021/acs.jctc.6b00925 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.489000310.1063/1.4890003 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.07300510.1103/PhysRevLett.102.073005 ↗
28. 10.1007/BF0054909610.1007/BF00549096 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.271556310.1063/1.2715563 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0582810.1021/acsnano.7b05828 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.progsurf.2016.05.00110.1016/j.progsurf.2016.05.001 ↗
32. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-01014310.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-010143 ↗
33. 10.1016/0042-207X(85)90319-710.1016/0042-207X(85)90319-7 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.21640510.1103/PhysRevLett.97.216405 ↗
35. 10.1002/pssa.20122831010.1002/pssa.201228310 ↗
36. 10.1080/08940886.2018.148365310.1080/08940886.2018.1483653 ↗
37. 10.1088/0953-8984/10/35/00410.1088/0953-8984/10/35/004 ↗
38. 10.1006/adnd.2000.084910.1006/adnd.2000.0849 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.06.02210.1016/j.cpc.2009.06.022 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.14610310.1103/PhysRevLett.108.146103 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.23640210.1103/PhysRevLett.108.236402 ↗
43. 10.1088/0953-8984/26/21/21320210.1088/0953-8984/26/21/213202 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b0036110.1021/acs.jctc.6b00361 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
46. 10.2478/s11534-011-0096-210.2478/s11534-011-0096-2 ↗
47. 10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e ↗
48. Nocedal, Jorge.; Wright, S. J. Numerical Optimization, 2nd ed. Springer Science + Business Media: New York, 2006; pp 136–144.
49. 10.17172/NOMAD/2020.02.11-110.17172/NOMAD/2020.02.11-1 ↗