journal article·2020-07-28

Strong, Ultralight Nanofoams with Extreme Recovery and Dissipation by Manipulation of Internal Adhesive Contacts

Sei Jin Park, Jungho Shin, Daniel J. Magagnosc, Sanha Kim, Changhong Cao, Kevin T. Turner, Prashant K. Purohit, Daniel S. Gianola, A. John Hart

ACS Nano· Volume 14· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Advances in three-dimensional nanofabrication techniques have enabled the development of lightweight solids, such as hollow nanolattices, having record values of specific stiffness and strength, albeit at low production throughput. At the length scales of the structural elements of these solids—which are often tens of nanometers or smaller—forces required for elastic deformation can be comparable to adhesive forces, rendering the possibility to tailor bulk mechanical properties based on the relative balance of these forces. Herein, we study this interplay via the mechanics of ultralight ceramic-coated carbon nanotube (CNT) structures. We show that ceramic-CNT foams surpass other architected nanomaterials in density-normalized strength and that, when the structures are designed to minimize internal adhesive interactions between CNTs, more than 97% of the strain after compression beyond densification is recovered. Via experiments and modeling, we study the dependence of the recovery and dissipation on the coating thickness, demonstrate that internal adhesive contacts impede recovery, and identify design guidelines for ultralight materials to have maximum recovery. The combination of high recovery and dissipation in ceramic-CNT foams may be useful in structural damping and shock absorption, and the general principles could be broadly applied to both architected and stochastic nanofoams.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Advanced Materials and Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States

Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States

Materials Department, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States

Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche · Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory · Air Force Office of Scientific Research · National Science Foundation · MIT-Skoltech Next Generation Program · Toyota Research Institute · NSERC Postdoctoral Fellowship Program

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.043710.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.07.11410.1016/j.matlet.2011.07.114 ↗
3. 10.1002/anie.20120655410.1002/anie.201206554 ↗
4. 10.1038/srep0036310.1038/srep00363 ↗
5. 10.1002/wnan.121310.1002/wnan.1213 ↗
6. 10.1038/nmat300110.1038/nmat3001 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20170670510.1002/adma.201706705 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0392310.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03923 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.125229110.1126/science.1252291 ↗
10. 10.1038/nmat469410.1038/nmat4694 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.063160910010.1073/pnas.0631609100 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.111895710.1126/science.1118957 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20110356110.1002/adma.201103561 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.121164910.1126/science.1211649 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.125590810.1126/science.1255908 ↗
16. 10.1021/nn500284m10.1021/nn500284m ↗
17. 10.1073/pnas.131514711110.1073/pnas.1315147111 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20140085110.1002/adfm.201400851 ↗
19. 10.1039/C7RA02452E10.1039/C7RA02452E ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.01210.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.012 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.283.5401.51210.1126/science.283.5401.512 ↗
22. 10.1021/jp904152v10.1021/jp904152v ↗
23. 10.1021/nn402710j10.1021/nn402710j ↗
24. 10.1039/c3cp51415c10.1039/c3cp51415c ↗
25. Gibson L. · 1999
26. 10.1038/3928210.1038/39282 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.251110.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2511 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0927-0256(97)00047-510.1016/S0927-0256(97)00047-5 ↗
29. 10.1021/nn300376j10.1021/nn300376j ↗
30. 10.1073/pnas.131225311010.1073/pnas.1312253110 ↗
31. Israelachvili J. N. · 2011
32. 10.1002/adfm.20120085210.1002/adfm.201200852 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.06.02510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.06.025 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.20430110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.204301 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.05210.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.052 ↗
36. 10.1021/nn202262j10.1021/nn202262j ↗
37. 10.1038/nnano.2012.11810.1038/nnano.2012.118 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.05.00510.1016/j.nanoen.2014.05.005 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.10.03010.1016/j.carbon.2008.10.030 ↗
40. 10.1021/am400148t10.1021/am400148t ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0287810.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02878 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.00210.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.002 ↗