Improvement of Spin Transfer Torque in Asymmetric Graphene Devices
Source abstract
Abstract
A graphene lateral spin valve structure with asymmetric contacts is presented for the first time, with enhancement of spin angular momentum absorption in its receiving magnet. The asymmetric device with tunneling barrier only at the injector magnet shows a comparable spin valve signal but lower electrical noises compared to the device with two tunneling barriers. We also report experimental measurements of spin transfer torque. Assisted by an external magnetic field of 2.5 mT, spin diffusion current-induced magnetization reversal occurs at a nonlocal charge current density of 33 mA/μm(2), smaller than that needed in devices with two tunneling barriers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Magnetic properties of thin films · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Birck Nanotechnology Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Hill E. W. · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 269410.1109/TMAG.2006.878852 ↗
2. Tombros N. · Nature · 2007 · 448 · 57110.1038/nature06037 ↗
3. Zomer P. J. · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 16141610.1103/PhysRevB.86.161416 ↗
4. 10.1109/IEDM.2012.647897810.1109/IEDM.2012.6478978 ↗
5. Behin-Aein B. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 5 · 26610.1038/nnano.2010.31 ↗
6. Slonczewski J. C. · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1996 · 159 · L110.1016/0304-8853(96)00062-5 ↗
7. Berger L. · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 935310.1103/PhysRevB.54.9353 ↗
8. Zhou B. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2010 · 22 · 445302
9. Zhou B. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2011 · 23 · 135304
10. Krompiewski S. · Nanotechnology · 2012 · 23 · 13520310.1088/0957-4484/23/13/135203 ↗
11. Lin C. C. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 517710.1021/nl402547m ↗
12. Schmidt G. · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · R479010.1103/PhysRevB.62.R4790 ↗
13. Rashba E. I. · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · R1626710.1103/PhysRevB.62.R16267 ↗
14. Fert A. · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 18442010.1103/PhysRevB.64.184420 ↗
15. Han W. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 16720210.1103/PhysRevLett.105.167202 ↗
16. Goto H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 21211010.1063/1.2937836 ↗
17. Maassen T. · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 11541010.1103/PhysRevB.83.115410 ↗
18. Jozsa C. · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 24140310.1103/PhysRevB.80.241403 ↗
19. Nowak E. R. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 74 · 60010.1063/1.123158 ↗
20. Takahashi S. · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 05240910.1103/PhysRevB.67.052409 ↗
21. Zhang J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 25660210.1103/PhysRevLett.93.256602 ↗
22. Yang T. · Nat. Phys. · 2008 · 4 · 85110.1038/nphys1095 ↗
23. Srinivasan S. · arXiv.org · 2013
24. Knoch J. · IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 11 · 51310.1109/TNANO.2011.2178611 ↗
25. Farmer D. B. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 38810.1021/nl803214a ↗
26. Hanbicki A. T. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 409210.1063/1.1580631 ↗
27. Chung N. L. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 03450310.1063/1.3466772 ↗
28. Sun J. Z. · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 57010.1103/PhysRevB.62.570 ↗
29. Zhang S. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 88 · 23660110.1103/PhysRevLett.88.236601 ↗
30. Ralph D. C. · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2008 · 320 · 119010.1016/j.jmmm.2007.12.019 ↗
31. Brataas A. · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 37210.1038/nmat3311 ↗
32. Myers E. B. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 19680110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.196801 ↗
33. Koch R. H. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 08830210.1103/PhysRevLett.92.088302 ↗