Carbon Nanotube Coated Paper Sensor for Damage Diagnosis
Source abstract
Abstract
A carbon nanotube coated paper sensor has been developed for the detection of damages in structural components. Electrical resistance tomography is used to measure changes in electrical potential at various locations induced by applying a small electrical current to the sample. The spatial locations and magnitudes of multiple damages are predicted accurately with a sensitivity of 73 ppm in sensing area. The detection limit of the sensor is estimated to be 29 ppm in sensing area, which is at least 30 times better in sensitivity than previous results (0.1-0.65%) in the literature.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
ELORET Corportaion, ‡SGT, Inc., and §University Space Research Association (USRA), NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035, United States
Funding
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Loh K. J. · J. Nondestruc. Eval. · 2009 · 28 · 910.1007/s10921-009-0043-y ↗
2. Ross, R. W.; Hilton, Y. L.Damage Diagnosis in Semiconductive Materials Using Electrical Impedance Measurements. 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Schaumburg, IL, April 7–10, 2008; p1936.10.2514/6.2008-1936 ↗
3. Borcea L. · Inverse Probl. · 2002 · 18 · R9910.1088/0266-5611/18/6/201 ↗
4. Baltopolos A. · J. Compos. Mater. · 2013 · 47 · 328510.1177/0021998312464079 ↗
5. Hou T. C. · Nanotechnology · 2007 · 18 · 31550110.1088/0957-4484/18/31/315501 ↗
6. Loh K. J. · Smart Mater. Struc. · 2007 · 16 · 42910.1088/0964-1726/16/2/022 ↗
7. Vadlamani V. K. · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2012 · 21 · 07501110.1088/0964-1726/21/7/075011 ↗
8. Hu N. · Acta Mater. · 2008 · 56 · 292910.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.030 ↗
9. Gao L. · Carbon · 2011 · 49 · 338210.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.003 ↗
10. Thostenson E. T. · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 21571310.1088/0957-4484/19/21/215713 ↗
11. Saffi M. · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 39550210.1088/0957-4484/20/39/395502 ↗
12. Todoroki A. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2003 · 63 · 191110.1016/S0266-3538(03)00157-X ↗
13. Todoroki A. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2004 · 64 · 74910.1016/j.compscitech.2003.08.004 ↗
14. Han J. W. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 2209410.1021/jp3080223 ↗
15. Han J. W. · RSC Adv. · 2014 · 4 · 54910.1039/C3RA46347H ↗
16. Ammu S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 134 · 455310.1021/ja300420t ↗
17. Hu L. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2009 · 2149010.1073/pnas.0908858106 ↗
18. Han J. W. · Mater. Res. Bull. · 2014 · 50 · 24910.1016/j.materresbull.2013.10.048 ↗
19. Islam M. F. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 3 · 26910.1021/nl025924u ↗
20. Sun T. · Biosens. Bioelectronics · 2010 · 25 · 110910.1016/j.bios.2009.09.036 ↗
21. Loyola B. R. · IEEE Sensors J. · 2013 · 13 · 235710.1109/JSEN.2013.2253456 ↗
22. Polydorides N. · Meas. Sci. Technol. · 2002 · 13 · 187110.1088/0957-0233/13/12/310 ↗
23. Adler A. · Physiol. Meas · 2006 · 27 · S2510.1088/0967-3334/27/5/S03 ↗
24. Currie L. A. · Pure Appl. Chem. · 1995 · 67 · 169910.1351/pac199567101699 ↗