journal article·2022-07-26Open access

Demonstration of Anti-ambipolar Switch and Its Applications for Extremely Low Power Ternary Logic Circuits

Yongsu Lee, Sunmean Kim, Ho-In Lee, Seung-Mo Kim, So-Young Kim, Kiyung Kim, Heejin Kwon, Hae-Won Lee, Hyeon Jun Hwang, Seokhyeong Kang, Byoung Hun Lee

ACS Nano· Volume 16· Issue 7

Abstract

Anti-ambipolar switch (AAS) devices at a narrow bias region are necessary to solve the intrinsic leakage current problem of ternary logic circuits. In this study, an AAS device with a very high peak-to-valley ratio (∼106) and adjustable operating range characteristics was successfully demonstrated using a ZnO and dinaphtho[2,3-b:2',3'-f]thieno[3,2-b]thiophene heterojunction structure. The entire device integration was completed at a low thermal budget of less than 200 °C, which makes this AAS device compatible with monolithic 3D integration. A 1-trit ternary full adder designed with this AAS device exhibits excellent power-delay product performance (∼122 aJ) with extremely low power (∼0.15 μW, 7 times lower than the reference circuit) and lower device count than those of other ternary device candidates.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Semiconductor Technology Convergence, Department of Electrical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Cheongam-ro 77, Nam-gu, Pohang, Gyeongbuk 37673, Republic of Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/JPROC.1998.65876210.1109/JPROC.1998.658762 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41928-019-0343-x10.1038/s41928-019-0343-x ↗
3. 10.1038/s41928-017-0005-910.1038/s41928-017-0005-9 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41928-018-0117-x10.1038/s41928-018-0117-x ↗
5. 10.1038/s41586-019-1573-910.1038/s41586-019-1573-9 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41928-019-0316-010.1038/s41928-019-0316-0 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20170400210.1002/adma.201704002 ↗
8. 10.3390/challe601011710.3390/challe6010117 ↗
9. 10.1109/16.13732510.1109/16.137325 ↗
10. Rine D. C. · 1977
11. 10.1109/JETCAS.2016.252804110.1109/JETCAS.2016.2528041 ↗
12. 10.1109/TC.1981.167586010.1109/TC.1981.1675860 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41928-019-0288-010.1038/s41928-019-0288-0 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41928-019-0220-710.1038/s41928-019-0220-7 ↗
15. 10.1109/ISMVL49045.2020.00-1310.1109/ISMVL49045.2020.00-13 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep3935310.1038/srep39353 ↗
17. 10.1109/TNANO.2004.84206810.1109/TNANO.2004.842068 ↗
18. 10.1109/TNANO.2009.203684510.1109/TNANO.2009.2036845 ↗
19. 10.1109/ASPDAC.2018.829736910.1109/ASPDAC.2018.8297369 ↗
20. 10.1109/TVLSI.2012.219824810.1109/TVLSI.2012.2198248 ↗
21. 10.1109/LED.2018.287405510.1109/LED.2018.2874055 ↗
22. 10.1109/ISMVL.2019.0001310.1109/ISMVL.2019.00013 ↗
23. Lee Y. · Sci. Rep. · 2022
24. 10.1038/s41467-019-09998-x10.1038/s41467-019-09998-x ↗
25. 10.1002/aelm.20210024710.1002/aelm.202100247 ↗
26. 10.1109/ISMVL.2016.5110.1109/ISMVL.2016.51 ↗
27. 10.1109/IITC.2018.843041510.1109/IITC.2018.8430415 ↗
28. 10.1109/TED.2020.303351010.1109/TED.2020.3033510 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.497921310.1063/1.4979213 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.493166210.1063/1.4931662 ↗
31. 10.1109/TNANO.2005.84700810.1109/TNANO.2005.847008 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.489295010.1063/1.4892950 ↗
33. 10.1021/nl402949410.1021/nl4029494 ↗
34. 10.1021/nl202180b10.1021/nl202180b ↗
35. 10.1063/1.370158610.1063/1.3701586 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0479110.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04791 ↗
37. 10.1038/nnano.2017.20810.1038/nnano.2017.208 ↗
38. 10.1002/aelm.20180041610.1002/aelm.201800416 ↗
39. 10.1002/adfm.20190964510.1002/adfm.201909645 ↗
40. 10.1039/C7NR01822C10.1039/C7NR01822C ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.04.01610.1016/j.jcis.2022.04.016 ↗
42. 10.1109/TED.2019.295704810.1109/TED.2019.2957048 ↗
43. 10.1039/D0TC04554C10.1039/D0TC04554C ↗
44. 10.1109/TED.2020.298973010.1109/TED.2020.2989730 ↗
45. 10.1002/aelm.20170010610.1002/aelm.201700106 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14861610.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148616 ↗
47. Nakata, M.; Tsuji, H.; Sato, H.; Nakajima, Y.; Fujisaki, Y.; Takei, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Fujikake, H. Influence of Oxide Semiconductor Thickness on TFT Characteristics. 2012 19th International Workshop on Active-Matrix Flatpanel Displays and Devices (AM-FPD); 2012.
48. 10.3390/cryst903014410.3390/cryst9030144 ↗
49. 10.1002/0470013192.bsa10710.1002/0470013192.bsa107 ↗
50. Stanford University CNTFET Model, https://nano.stanford.edu/downloads/stanford-cnfet-model (accessed Feb 14, 2022).
51. Predictive Technology Model (PTM), http://ptm.asu.edu (accessed Feb 14, 2022).
52. Etiemble, D. Comparing Ternary and Binary Adders and Multipliers. 2019, arXiv:1908.07299, https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.07299 (accessed Feb 8, 2022).
53. 10.1109/LED.2013.229053210.1109/LED.2013.2290532 ↗