journal article·2020-12-22Open access

Confinement and Processing Can Alter the Morphology and Periodicity of Bottlebrush Block Copolymers in Thin Films

Daniel F. Sunday, Moshe Dolejsi, Alice B. Chang, Lee J. Richter, Ruipeng Li, R. Joseph Kline, Paul F. Nealey, Robert H. Grubbs

ACS Nano· Volume 14· Issue 12

Abstract

Bottlebrush block copolymers (BBCPs) are intriguing architectural variations on linear BCPs with highly tunable structure. Confinement can have a significant impact on polymer assembly, giving rise to changes in morphology, assembly kinetics, and properties like the glass transition. Given that confinement leads to significant changes in the persistence length of bottlebrush homopolymers, it is reasonable to expect that BBCPs will see significant changes in their structure and periodicity relative to the bulk morphology. Understanding how confinement influences assembly will be important for designing BBCPs for thin film applications including membranes, integrated photonic structures, and potentially BCP lithography. In order to study the effects of confinement on BBCP conformation and morphology, a blade coating was used to prepare films with continuous variation in film thickness. Unlike thin films of linear BCPs, islands/holes were not observed, and instead mixtures of parallel and perpendicular morphologies emerge after annealing. The lamellar periodicity (L0) of the morphologies is found to be thickness dependent, increasing L0 with decreasing film thickness for blade coated films. Films coated out of tetrahydrofuran (THF) resulted in a single well-defined lamellar periodicity, verified through atomic force microscopy (AFM) and grazing incidence small-angle X-ray scattering (GISAXS), which increases dramatically from the bulk value (30.6 nm) and continues to increase as the film thickness decreases. The largest observed L0 was 65.5 nm, and this closely approaches the estimated upper limit of 67 nm corresponding to a fully extended backbone in a bilayer arrangement. Films coated out of propylene glycol methyl ether acetate (PGMEA) resulted in a mixture of perpendicular lamellae and a smaller, likely cylindrical morphology. The lamellar portion of the film shows the same thickness dependence as the lamellae observed in the THF coated films. The scaling of the lamellar L0 with respect to film thickness follows predictions for confined semiflexible polymers with weak excluded volume interactions and can be related to models for confinement of DNA. Spin coated films shows the same reduction in periodicity, although at very different film thicknesses. This result suggests that the material has shallow free-energy barriers to transitioning between different L0 and morphologies, a property that could be taken advantage of for patterning diverse structures with a single material.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Block Copolymer Self-Assembly · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Science and Engineering Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States

Institute for Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, 5801 S Ellis Ave, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States

Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States

National Synchrotron Light Source II, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, United States

Funding

National Institute of Standards and Technology

References (81)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1146/annurev.pc.41.100190.00252110.1146/annurev.pc.41.100190.002521 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b0047210.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00472 ↗
3. 10.1021/ma60078a04710.1021/ma60078a047 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.116295010.1126/science.1162950 ↗
5. 10.1038/nature0177510.1038/nature01775 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.115762610.1126/science.1157626 ↗
7. 10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70106-110.1016/S1369-7021(10)70106-1 ↗
8. 10.1021/ma401762n10.1021/ma401762n ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20110064010.1002/adma.201100640 ↗
10. 10.1021/cm070792x10.1021/cm070792x ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0095010.1021/acs.macromol.5b00950 ↗
12. 10.1021/ja107309p10.1021/ja107309p ↗
13. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.06.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.06.003 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.02610.1016/j.addr.2012.09.026 ↗
15. 10.1038/4221810.1038/42218 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.275.5305.145810.1126/science.275.5305.1458 ↗
17. 10.1021/ma801778m10.1021/ma801778m ↗
18. 10.1126/science.122604610.1126/science.1226046 ↗
19. 10.1021/nn403616r10.1021/nn403616r ↗
20. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c0002010.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00020 ↗
21. 10.1021/ja072929q10.1021/ja072929q ↗
22. 10.1073/pnas.121305510910.1073/pnas.1213055109 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0003210.1021/acsnano.7b00032 ↗
24. 10.1126/science.aar530810.1126/science.aar5308 ↗
25. 10.1021/jp047929g10.1021/jp047929g ↗
26. 10.1021/ma010746x10.1021/ma010746x ↗
27. 10.1021/ma021519d10.1021/ma021519d ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.06830210.1103/PhysRevLett.113.068302 ↗
29. 10.1021/ma951138i10.1021/ma951138i ↗
30. 10.1063/1.48000610.1063/1.480006 ↗
31. 10.1021/nn304217y10.1021/nn304217y ↗
32. 10.1021/jacs.5b0288110.1021/jacs.5b02881 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0666410.1021/acsnano.7b06664 ↗
34. 10.1073/pnas.170138611410.1073/pnas.1701386114 ↗
35. 10.1021/jacs.6b0767010.1021/jacs.6b07670 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0141510.1021/acs.macromol.6b01415 ↗
37. 10.1021/ma061317810.1021/ma0613178 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0068210.1021/acs.macromol.5b00682 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0036410.1021/acs.macromol.7b00364 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0547310.1021/acsnano.5b05473 ↗
41. 10.1002/polb.2482410.1002/polb.24824 ↗
42. 10.1021/nn305867d10.1021/nn305867d ↗
43. 10.1021/nn402639g10.1021/nn402639g ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0137010.1021/acs.macromol.8b01370 ↗
45. 10.1021/ma802304y10.1021/ma802304y ↗
46. 10.1021/ma800932310.1021/ma8009323 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0084310.1021/acs.macromol.9b00843 ↗
48. 10.1021/mz500580f10.1021/mz500580f ↗
49. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0539010.1021/acsnano.6b05390 ↗
50. 10.1021/ma100150j10.1021/ma100150j ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0103010.1021/acs.macromol.9b01030 ↗
52. 10.1002/polb.2367510.1002/polb.23675 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0132510.1021/acs.macromol.8b01325 ↗
54. 10.1038/nature0457610.1038/nature04576 ↗
55. 10.1007/s10189017014710.1007/s101890170147 ↗
56. 10.1021/ma061235j10.1021/ma061235j ↗
57. 10.1002/marc.20040023510.1002/marc.200400235 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.217307210.1063/1.2173072 ↗
59. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b0001110.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00011 ↗
60. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0224210.1021/acs.macromol.8b02242 ↗
61. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0273910.1021/acs.macromol.7b02739 ↗
62. 10.1038/nature1908910.1038/nature19089 ↗
63. 10.1073/pnas.191636211710.1073/pnas.1916362117 ↗
64. 10.1039/b923598a10.1039/b923598a ↗
65. 10.1039/c0lc00680g10.1039/c0lc00680g ↗
66. de Gennes P.-G. · 1979
67. 10.1021/ma60077a04810.1021/ma60077a048 ↗
68. 10.1021/ma00242a01510.1021/ma00242a015 ↗
69. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.19610110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.196101 ↗
70. 10.1021/ma201277e10.1021/ma201277e ↗
71. 10.1021/mz300323a10.1021/mz300323a ↗
72. 10.1103/PhysRevE.97.02250210.1103/PhysRevE.97.022502 ↗
73. 10.1039/C7SM00967D10.1039/C7SM00967D ↗
74. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0219810.1021/acs.macromol.8b02198 ↗
75. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.16780110.1103/PhysRevLett.119.167801 ↗
76. 10.1021/nn502928910.1021/nn5029289 ↗
77. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0069110.1021/acs.macromol.7b00691 ↗
78. 10.1021/nl202052610.1021/nl2020526 ↗
79. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0088010.1021/acs.macromol.5b00880 ↗
80. 10.1088/0957-4484/27/43/43530310.1088/0957-4484/27/43/435303 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.nima.2010.12.04510.1016/j.nima.2010.12.045 ↗