journal article·2014-06-24

Synergetic Chemical Coupling Controls the Uniformity of Carbon Nanotube Microstructure Growth

Mostafa Bedewy, Brittan Farmer, A. John Hart

ACS Nano· Volume 8· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Control of the uniformity of vertically aligned carbon nanotube structures (CNT "forests"), in terms of both geometry and nanoscale morphology (density, diameter, and alignment), is crucial for applications. Many studies report complex and sometimes unexplained spatial variations of the height of macroscopic CNT forests, as well as variations among micropillars grown from lithographically patterned catalyst arrays. We present a model for chemically coupled CNT growth, which describes the origins of synergetic growth effects among CNT micropillars in proximity. Via this model, we propose that growth of CNTs is locally enhanced by active species that are catalytically produced at the substrate-bound nanoparticles. The local concentration of these active species modulates the growth rate of CNTs, in a spatially dependent manner driven by diffusion and local generation/consumption at the catalyst sites. Through experiments and numerical simulations, we study how the uniformity of CNT micropillars can be influenced by their size and spacing within arrays and predict the widely observed abrupt transition between tangled and vertical CNT growth by assigning a threshold concentration of active species. This mathematical framework enables predictive modeling of spatially dependent CNT growth, as well as design of catalyst patterns to achieve engineered uniformity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Nanotechnology research and applications · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanosynthesis Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2350 Hayward Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States

Mechanosynthesis Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Laboratory for Manufacturing and Productivity, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States

Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States

Funding

National Science Foundation · U.S. Department of Energy

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. De Volder M. F. L. · Science · 2013 · 339 · 53510.1126/science.1222453 ↗
2. Hutchens S. B. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2010 · 20 · 233810.1002/adfm.201000305 ↗
3. Maschmann M. R. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2012 · 22 · 468610.1002/adfm.201200676 ↗
4. Wei B. Q. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 117210.1063/1.1396632 ↗
5. Tawfick S. · Small · 2009 · 5 · 246710.1002/smll.200900741 ↗
6. Berber S. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 461310.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4613 ↗
7. Yuan G. · IEEE Trans. Comp. Packag. Technol. · 2013 · 3 · 1524
8. Hata K. · Science · 2004 · 306 · 136210.1126/science.1104962 ↗
9. Han J. H. · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 5310.1021/nn700200c ↗
10. Vinten P. · Carbon · 2011 · 49 · 497210.1016/j.carbon.2011.02.017 ↗
11. De Volder M. F. L. · Microelectron. Eng. · 2010 · 87 · 123310.1016/j.mee.2009.11.139 ↗
12. Jeong G. H. · Carbon · 2009 · 47 · 69610.1016/j.carbon.2008.11.003 ↗
13. Parker J. M. · Carbon · 2013 · 62 · 6110.1016/j.carbon.2013.05.053 ↗
14. Borgstrom M. T. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2007 · 2 · 54110.1038/nnano.2007.263 ↗
15. Bronikowski M. J. · Carbon · 2006 · 44 · 282210.1016/j.carbon.2006.03.022 ↗
16. Meshot E. R. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 247710.1021/nn900446a ↗
17. Plata D. L. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 43 · 8367
18. Plata D. L. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 718510.1021/nn101842g ↗
19. Kimura H. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 315010.1021/nn305513e ↗
20. Eres G. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 1668410.1021/jp051531i ↗
21. Nessim G. D. · Carbon · 2011 · 49 · 80410.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.018 ↗
22. Magrez A. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 342810.1021/nn200012z ↗
23. Stine B. E. · IEEE Trans. Semiconduct. Manufact. · 1998 · 11 · 12910.1109/66.661292 ↗
24. Abrokwah K. O. · IEEE Trans. Semiconduct. Manufact. · 2007 · 20 · 7710.1109/TSM.2007.896638 ↗
25. Latorre N. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 477310.1021/jp906893m ↗
26. Bedewy M. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 897410.1021/nn203144f ↗
27. Puretzky A. A. · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 2005 · 81 · 22310.1007/s00339-005-3256-7 ↗
28. Moseler M. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 758710.1021/nn102118y ↗
29. Wirth C. T. · Chem. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 463310.1021/cm301402g ↗
30. Hofmann S. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 60210.1021/nl0624824 ↗
31. Ding F. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2009 · 106 · 250610.1073/pnas.0811946106 ↗
32. Rao R. · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 21310.1038/nmat3231 ↗
33. Geohegan D. B. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 831110.1021/nn2030397 ↗
34. Bedewy M. · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 292810.1039/c3nr34067h ↗
35. Hirschfelder J. O. · 1964
36. Bedewy M. · Carbon · 2012 · 50 · 510610.1016/j.carbon.2012.06.051 ↗
37. Bedewy M. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 2057610.1021/jp904152v ↗
38. Park S. J. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 15 · 1151110.1039/c3cp51415c ↗
39. Moulton K. · J. Micromech. Microeng. · 2012 · 22 · 05500410.1088/0960-1317/22/5/055004 ↗
40. Zhong G. F. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 190710.1021/jp067776s ↗
41. Zhu L. B. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 544510.1021/jp060027q ↗
42. Wirth C. T. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 356010.1021/nn900613e ↗
43. Zhang G. Y. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2005 · 102 · 1614110.1073/pnas.0507064102 ↗
44. Magrez A. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2007 · 46 · 44110.1002/anie.200603764 ↗
45. Nasibulin A. G. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 417 · 17910.1016/j.cplett.2005.10.022 ↗
46. Liu K. · Carbon · 2007 · 45 · 237910.1016/j.carbon.2007.07.008 ↗