Direct and Inverse Auger Processes in InAs Nanocrystals: Can the Decay Signature of a Trion Be Mistaken for Carrier Multiplication?
Source abstract
Abstract
A complete and detailed theoretical investigation of the main processes involved in the controversial detection and quantification of carrier multiplication (CM) is presented, providing a coherent and comprehensive picture of excited state relaxation in InAs nanocrystals (NCs). The observed rise and decay times of the 1S transient bleach are reproduced, in the framework of the Auger model, using an atomistic semiempirical pseudopotential method, achieving excellent agreement with experiment. The CM time constants for small core-only and core/shell nanocrystals are obtained as a function of the excitation energy, assuming an impact-ionization-like process. The resulting lifetimes at energies close to the observed CM onset are consistent with the upper limits deduced experimentally from PbSe and CdSe samples. Most interestingly, as the Auger recombination lifetimes calculated for charged excitons are found to be of a similar order of magnitude to those computed for biexcitons, both species are expected to exhibit the fast decay component in NC population dynamics so far attributed exclusively to the presence of biexcitons and therefore identified as the signature of CM occurrence in high-energy low-pump-fluence spectroscopic studies. However, the ratio between trions and biexcitons time constants is found to be larger than the typical experimental accuracy. It is therefore concluded that, in InAs NCs, it should be experimentally possible to discriminate between the two species and that the origin of the observed discrepancies in CM yields is unlikely to lay in the presence of charged excitons.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Microwaves and Photonics, School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Nozik A. J. · Physica E · 2002 · 14 · 11510.1016/S1386-9477(02)00374-0 ↗
2. Schaller R. D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 186601-110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.186601 ↗
3. Schaller R. D. · Nat. Phys. · 2005 · 1 · 18910.1038/nphys151 ↗
4. Ellingson R. · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 86510.1021/nl0502672 ↗
5. Schaller R. D. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 253102-110.1063/1.2142092 ↗
6. Klimov V. I. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 1682710.1021/jp0615959 ↗
7. Schaller R. D. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 42410.1021/nl052276g ↗
8. Murphy J. E. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 324110.1021/ja0574973 ↗
9. Beard M. C. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 250610.1021/nl071486l ↗
10. Pijpers J. J. H. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 414610.1021/jp066709v ↗
11. Schaller R. D. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 346910.1021/nl072046x ↗
12. Nair G. · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 081304-1−08130410.1103/PhysRevB.76.081304 ↗
13. Ben-Lulu M. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 120710.1021/nl080199u ↗
14. Pijpers J. J. H. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 478310.1021/jp800834h ↗
15. Nair G. · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 125325−110.1103/PhysRevB.78.125325 ↗
16. Trinh M. T. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 171310.1021/nl0807225 ↗
17. McGuire J. A. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2008 · 41 · 181010.1021/ar800112v ↗
18. Schaller R. D. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 2533210.1021/jp065282p ↗
19. Allan G. · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 195324-110.1103/PhysRevB.79.195324 ↗
20. Gooding A. K. · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 66910.1021/nn7003469 ↗
21. Schaller R. D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 097402-1−09740210.1103/PhysRevLett.96.097402 ↗
22. Efros A. L. · Sov. Phys. Semicond. · 1982 · 16 · 772
23. Madelung, O.; Schulz, M.; Heiss, HNumerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, New Series;Springer-Verlag:New York, 1982; Vol.17, Subvol. a, p299.
24. Klimov V. I. · Science · 2000 · 287 · 101110.1126/science.287.5455.1011 ↗
25. Wang L.-W. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 91 · 056404-1−056404
26. Lee S. · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 66 · 235307-1
27. Puangmali T. · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 245104-110.1103/PhysRevB.78.245104 ↗
28. Wang L.-W. · Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 51 · 1739810.1103/PhysRevB.51.17398 ↗
29. Delerue C. · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 68 · 115411-110.1103/PhysRevB.68.115411 ↗
30. Cartoixa X. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 236804-110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.236804 ↗
31. Htoon H. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 91 · 227401-110.1103/PhysRevLett.91.227401 ↗
32. Pandey A. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2007 · 127 · 111104-1
33. Califano, M.Unpublished work.
34. Puangmali T. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2009 · 21 · 144212-1
35. Banin U. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1998 · 109 · 230610.1063/1.476797 ↗
36. Banin U. · Nature · 1999 · 400 · 54210.1038/22979 ↗
37. Krapf D. · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 073301-1−07330110.1103/PhysRevB.69.073301 ↗
38. Guzelian A. A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 69 · 143210.1063/1.117605 ↗
39. As it was argued in the text that in core-only NCs the presence of hole trap states at the surface leads to a negligibly smallτh−1, henceτXX≈τe, the values ofτX+/τXXrelative to these structures are not included in the inset, andτX−/τXX= 3 for all core-only NCs (see Method section).
40. Puangmali, T.; Califano, M.; Harrison, P.Unpublished work.
41. Wei S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 72 · 201110.1063/1.121249 ↗
42. Cao Y. W. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2000 · 122 · 969210.1021/ja001386g ↗
43. Although both states are contributed to by several different angular momentum components, the transition from (VBM, VBM-1), having prevalent p symmetry, to the CBM (strongly s in character) has a small oscillator strength (is formally optically forbidden) compared to the transition from (VBM-2, VBM-3), with prevalent s symmetry, to the same state. Therefore the absorption of light occurs from the optically allowed transition (VBM-2, VBM-3) → CBM, whereas emission occurs from the “dark” band edge recombination (VBM, VBM-1) → CBM, weakly allowed due to the presence of some s component in the mixed (VBM, VBM-1) state. The slow radiative recombination observed in InAs/CdSe NCs has indeed been attributed(11)to the involvement of a low-lying, optically passive dark exciton state.
44. Jha P. P. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 101110.1021/nn9001177 ↗
45. Shabaev A. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 285610.1021/nl062059v ↗
46. Franceschetti A. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 219110.1021/nl0612401 ↗
47. Califano M. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 857010.1021/jp7104743 ↗
48. An J. M. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 128 · 164720-1
49. Delerue C. · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 125340-1
50. When the state |ei,hj⟩ undergoes DCM it can decay either into |e1,ek;hj,hm⟩ or |ei,ek;h1,hm⟩ but not into |el,ek;hn,hm⟩ ifl,k≠iandn,m≠j. The biexcitonic DOS that satisfy the Coulomb selection rule are effectively calculated asρXX= 2(ρX−+ρX+), that is, by taking the sum of the DOS relative to negative and positive trions. The factor 2 accounts for the degeneracy due to the missing fourth particle which is the fixedspectatorcarrier in both the DCM and AR processes.
51. Califano M. · Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 52510.1021/nl049869w ↗
52. Califano M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 84 · 240910.1063/1.1690104 ↗
53. Luo J.-W. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 317410.1021/nl801459h ↗
54. Califano, M.Model-Independent Determination of the Carrier Multiplication Time Constant in CdSe Nanocrystals.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., in press.
55. Rabani E. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 448810.1021/nl802443c ↗